| 犯罪对象概念的反思与重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 许发民,康诚.犯罪对象概念的反思与重构[J].法学研究,2007(5):121-128. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 许发民 康诚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉大学法学院;2. 江西省人民检察院;1. 武汉大学法学院;2. 江西省人民检察院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑法学者之所以在不同场合赋予犯罪对象不同含义,是因为我国刑法理论中的传统犯罪对象概念存在一定的缺陷。有必要重构犯罪对象概念,将“犯罪行为直接作用的具体人和物”与“犯罪客体的直接物质承担者”两种含义适当分离,在理论上区分为直接犯罪对象与间接犯罪对象,二者作为犯罪实行行为指向的事物,有时可发生部分重合,但功能上并不相同,不可相互替代。
|
| 关 键 词： | 直接犯罪对象 间接犯罪对象 犯罪客体 |
Target of Crime:Rethinking and Reconstruction |
| |
| Xu Famin and Kang Cheng.Target of Crime:Rethinking and Reconstruction[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2007(5):121-128. |
| |
| Authors: | Xu Famin and Kang Cheng |
| |
| Abstract: | The concept of the target of crime is endowed with different implications in different circumstances. Such phenomenon results from the inherent defects existing in this concept of our criminal law theories. It is necessary to reconstruct this concept, separate two implications of "the concrete person and object affected directly by criminal acts" and "the direct material undertaker of the object of crime", and differentiate the direct target of crime and indirect one. Although the two concepts may coincide partly in some cases, they have different functions and cannot be replaced by each other. |
| |
| Keywords: | the direct target of crime the indirect target of crime the object of crime |
|
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
|
