| 我国群体诉讼的立法与司法实践 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 章武生,杨严炎.我国群体诉讼的立法与司法实践[J].法学研究,2007(2):112-120. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 章武生 杨严炎 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学法学院;复旦大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国大多数群体纠纷被法院分案受理,既有制度本身的问题,又与司法实践中存在着影响法院积极适用代表人诉讼的诸多因素和司法政策有关。由于群体纠纷本身就需要根据案件的具体情况,采取多元化的方式处理,所以,法院通过其他一些诉讼形式解决群体纠纷是无可非议的。但是,在多元化群体纠纷解决机制中,代表人诉讼制度是必不可少的,其独特的价值和功能是不可能被现在各地法院所尝试的其他替代性诉讼方式所完全取代的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 群体纠纷 群体诉讼 代表人诉讼 |
The Legislation and Judicial Practice of China's Group Action |
| |
| Zhang Wusheng.The Legislation and Judicial Practice of China's Group Action[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2007(2):112-120. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Wusheng |
| |
| Abstract: | In China,most of group disputes are separated by the courts to make trial on them, the reasons of which not only concern the system itself, but also concern the existence of many factors and judicial policies in judicial practice influencing courts to adopt representative action positively. In fact,it is irreproachable for the court to resolve group disputes through some other litigation procedures, because group disputes themselves ask foe pluralistic ways to be adopted according to concrete situation of each case. But among the pluralistic resolution mechanisms, the representative action system is indispensable, whose unique value and function are impossible to be replaced by the other litigation ways tried by the regional courts completely. |
| |
| Keywords: | group dispute group action representative action |
|
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
|
