| 对能动司法理念的反思及方法论定位 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李辉.对能动司法理念的反思及方法论定位[J].浙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2011,1(3):36-41. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京理工大学,法学院,北京,100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金一般项目《司法能动与中国特色司法发展道路的探索》 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 司法能动主义是法治建设发展到一定阶段后司法理念的基本延伸，而不是对司法理念的背叛和超越。这和我国目前所倡导具有明显口号性、社会应急性、政治任务性和意识形态性的能动司法主张及经验明显不同。如何规范地理解、运用能动司法，一是不适宜从理念高度探讨能动司法，应坚持司法的法治理念；二是应设法通过法律方法和技术，节制、规范能动司法活动，促使能动司法不违背法治理念。
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法能动主义 能动司法 司法理念 法律方法 |
Reflection on Active Judiciary and Its Position in Methodology |
| |
| LI Hui.Reflection on Active Judiciary and Its Position in Methodology[J].Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University,2011,1(3):36-41. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Hui |
| |
| Affiliation: | LI Hui ( School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology, BeiJing 100081, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Judicial activism has expand the judicial ideas in certain phrase of rule of law, which has not betrayed or transcend the judicial ideas. The active judiciary in China is just political slogan，reaction to social emergency, political mission and ideology，which is very different from judicial activism. Then we should understand and apply active judiciary normally through the following methods. First, its not proper for us to treat it as basic idea, and we should insist on rule of law in judiciary; second, with legal methods and technology, we can refrain the active judiciary in legal norms, making sure that active judiciary does not betray the idea of rule of law. |
| |
| Keywords: | Judicial activism active judiciary judicial ideas legal method |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》下载全文 |
|
