Trying not to lose: The electoral consequences of unilateral reform efforts and the social pact formation process |
| |
| Authors: | ERIC GRAIG CASTATER KYUNG JOON HAN |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Davis & Elkins College, Elkins, WV, USA;2. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The existing social pact literature claims that governing parties offer social pact proposals because they anticipate they will receive an electoral benefit from social pact agreements. Yet the available data on social pacts inform us that in a substantial minority of cases social pact proposals fail to become social pact agreements. In an effort to better determine the political calculations made by governments before they propose a social pact, this article examines the effect of implementing reform legislation unilaterally, social pact proposals, social pact proposal failures and social pact agreements on the vote share of government parties in 15 Western European countries between 1981 and 2006. It is found that social pact proposals do not have any electoral consequences for governing parties, unilateral legislation and social pact proposal failures reduce the vote share of governing parties, and social pact agreements provide an electoral benefit to parties in minority governments only. These findings suggest that governing parties propose social pacts in a good faith effort to complete a social pact agreement; and that such an agreement is not a way for these parties to gain votes, but to avoid the electoral punishment associated with enacting unpopular reforms unilaterally. |
| |
| Keywords: | social pacts labour unions corporatism voting Western Europe |
|
|
