| 证据法学基本问题之反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋英辉,吴宏耀,雷小政.证据法学基本问题之反思[J].法学研究,2005(6):52-67. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋英辉 吴宏耀 雷小政 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学诉讼法研究中心 教授(宋英辉)，中国政法大学诉讼法研究中心 副教授(吴宏耀)，中国政法大学诉讼法学专业 硕士研究生(雷小政) |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部2002年度法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目重点研究课题《我国证据制度的理论与实践问题》的阶段性成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 证据法学理论基础的根本问题在于形成体现现代证明活动自身特殊性的具体认知理论。裁判事实与事实真相之间的关系具有或然性,应寻求适当法律程序与规则,以保障关于案件事实的认识在最大程度上符合或者接近客观存在的事实。应当走出以点带面的偏狭思维,转向一种动态的证据概念,并在证据的真实性上强调当下社会认知条件所能达到的真实或属实。基于狭义证明理论,裁判并非都以查明事实真相为必要条件和最终目的,但并不能因此而否定法官的照顾义务和消极的实质真实义务。证据法学的研究方法应是一个多元化的、开放性的、与时偕行的体系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 认识论 事实 证据 诉讼证明 研究方法 |
Rethinking of Fundamental Issues of Evidence Law |
| |
| Song Yinghui,Wu Hongyao and Lei Xiaozheng.Rethinking of Fundamental Issues of Evidence Law[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2005(6):52-67. |
| |
| Authors: | Song Yinghui Wu Hongyao and Lei Xiaozheng |
| |
| Abstract: | In the theories of legal science of evidence, its key of the foundation is to form a cognitive theory conformable to the specialty of modern proving activities. Due to the uncertainty about the identity between judicial facts and the reality of cases, appropriate legal procedures and rules should be followed to guarantee the largest possibility of the identity. The conception of evidence should transfer from the traditionally narrow understanding to a dynamic understanding. The conformity of evidence to realities is restricted by current cognitive conditions. The logical conclusion of the traditionally narrow theory of proof is that judges have obligations to find the reality of the case and the taking care obligation, although not all the judgments take the finding of reality as its necessary precondition and ultimate aim. The research method of the legal science of evidence should be a multiple, open and up-to-date system. |
| |
| Keywords: | epistemology reality evidence proof in litigations research methods |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
