| 票据犯罪若干问题研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘华.票据犯罪若干问题研究[J].法学研究,2000(6):76-92. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海市社会科学院法学研究所!副研究员 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 票据犯罪主体因罪而异 ,有的票据犯罪一般个人主体、一般单位主体不能实施 ,只有特殊个人主体、特殊单位主体才能实施。有的票据犯罪主体必须具有票据当事人身份 ,非票据当事人不能成为该项犯罪主体。票据犯罪罪过形式是故意和过失 ,模糊罪过和混合罪过的观点并不适用刑法所要求的票据犯罪。银行结算凭证虽然不是票据 ,但是应该归属票据犯罪对象范畴。我国刑法应当承认票据无形伪造。
|
| 关 键 词： | 票据 票据犯罪 银行结算凭证 伪造票据 |
A Study of Questions of Instrument Crime |
| |
| Liu Hua.A Study of Questions of Instrument Crime[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2000(6):76-92. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Hua |
| |
| Abstract: | The subjects of crimes involving negotiable instrument are different in various cases. Some crime of this kind cannot be committed by an ordinary individual or ordinary unit as the subject, and only can be committed by a specific individual and specific unit. Some subject of the crime must have the status of a party to a negotiable instrument, it is impossible for a non-party to become the subject of the crime. The types of crimes concerning negotiable instrument consist of both intentional and negligentcrimes. Views on buggy offense and mixed offense are not applicable to such crimes as stipulated in the Criminal Law.There are nine behavior patterns in crimes involving negotiable instruments. but illegal filling in the content of the instruments. Banking settlement voucher cannot be rendered as instruments. Howver it shauld be classified as objects of instrument crime. Intangeable forsification of instruments should be accepted in the Chinese criminal law. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
|
