| 论合宪性解释方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王书成.论合宪性解释方法[J].法学研究,2012(5):50-68. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王书成 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 香港城市大学法律学院中国法与比较法研究中心 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金青年项目“我国宪法总纲条款的规范属性与实施机制研究”(12CFX016)资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 虽然合宪性解释方法在概念上会存在些许差别,但其所遵循的合宪性推定逻辑是相通的,即都体现了司法权对立法权的谦抑。合宪性解释方法中所含括的单纯解释规则,如果不与冲突规则在学理上加以区分,则很容易对合宪性解释产生认识上的偏差。目前合宪性解释方法所模本的欧陆经验,从源流上来说,最早其实可溯及至早期美国合宪性推定的理论与实践,并与回避宪法方法一脉相承。通过合宪性推定可以发现,合宪性解释方法可以从宪法方法与法律方法两个层面展开。把握其内在理路及权力逻辑,方可使其具有本土可能性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 合宪性解释 合宪性推定 宪法方法 法律方法 |
Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine Revisited: A Derivation from the Presumption of Constitutionality |
| |
| Wang Shucheng.Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine Revisited: A Derivation from the Presumption of Constitutionality[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2012(5):50-68. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Shucheng |
| |
| Abstract: | Comparatively speaking, different jurisdictions may use different terms to express the Constitutional Avoidance Doctrine. To some extent, the doctrine follows the principle of presumption of constitutionality in the process of constitutional interpretation or statutory interpretation, which somewhat denotes the deference of judicial power to legislative power. However, as to the substance of the doctrine, we should distinguish between the interpretation rule which refers that relevant constitutional provisions are able to have direct effect on the statutory interpretation, and the conflicts rule which refers that the court should refuse to rule on a constitutional issue if the case can be resolved on a non-constitutional basis. Currently in Chinese academic circles, scholars emphasize too much on theinterpretation rule, even arguing that Chinese courts are able to activate the constitutional application through this doctrine in the process of adjudication on general cases. This argument has distorted the essence of the doctrine to some extent, and needs to be clarified from theoretical lens. Originally speaking, the constitutional avoidance doctrine even in the context of European countries is from the practice of the United States. It is necessary to distinguish the doctrine at two distinctive levels. One is the application of the doctrine in the process of constitutional interpretation by the constitutional review organs; the other is the application of the doctrine in the process of statutory interpretation by general courts. After that, there exists the possibility of transplanting and applying the doctrine in China either by the courts or by the future activated constitutional review organ. |
| |
| Keywords: | constitutional avoidance doctrine presumption of constitutionality constitutional methodology statutory methodology |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
|
