| 我国无独立请求权第三人制度的改革与完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 章武生.我国无独立请求权第三人制度的改革与完善[J].法学研究,2006(3):53-62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 章武生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学法学院 教授 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国无独立请求权第三人制度具体改革方案的设计以及相关配套措施的推进,应是引进大陆法系的从参加制度时,保障从参加人的诉讼权利,同时赋予从参加人一次性纠纷解决的选择权;而引进美国的第三方被告制度时,则需要为第三人提供更有力的保护措施。此外,还应增设交互诉讼制度,重新界定第三人的范围,将可以作为本诉共同被告的人从第三人中分离出去。
|
| 关 键 词： | 无独立请求权第三人 从参加人 第三方被告 交互诉讼 |
The Reform and Improvement of the Rule of Third Party Without Independent Claims |
| |
| Zhang Wusheng.The Reform and Improvement of the Rule of Third Party Without Independent Claims[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2006(3):53-62. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Wusheng |
| |
| Affiliation: | Zhang Wusheng |
| |
| Abstract: | The design of concrete reformational plans and the advancement of correlate measures of the system of third party without independent claims in China should take for reference the assisting partici- pation system in Continental Legal countries and the third party defendant system in America. When we introduce the assisting participation system, litigation rights of the assisting party should be protected, especially entrusting them the option to resolve disputes at one time. When we introduce the American third party defendant system, the third party should be provided more powerful protective measures. In addition, we should add the cross claim litigation, and re-demarcate the scope of the third party so that the person who can be regarded as common defendant could be separated from the third party. |
| |
| Keywords: | third party without independent claims the assisting party the third party defendant cross claim litigation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
|
