| 法律原则在法律推理中的地位和作用——一个比较的研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 葛洪义.法律原则在法律推理中的地位和作用——一个比较的研究[J].法学研究,2002(6):3-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 葛洪义 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北政法学院 教授 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国关于法律原则的讨论一般集中在立法过于笼统与立法所规定的法律基本原则这两个方面。这种意义上的法律原则与德沃金所说的法律原则存在重要区别。德沃金关于法律原则的讨论其目的是强调法律的确定性 ,而我们关于法律原则的讨论却在强化法律的模糊性。法律原则的讨论主要涉及法律推理过程中原则与规则之间的关系。基于法治的原因 ,法律推理必须坚持将法律规则作为法律推理的大前提 ;在法律规则含义不明确、模糊或者相互矛盾时 ,可以使用法律原则 ,但是 ,必须经过一定的法律原则的认定程序。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律原则 法律推理 法律规则 |
Position and Role of Legal Principles in Legal Reasoning |
| |
| Ge Hongyi.Position and Role of Legal Principles in Legal Reasoning[J].Chinese Journal of Law,2002(6):3-14. |
| |
| Authors: | Ge Hongyi |
| |
| Abstract: | The discussion on legal principles in China is generally centered around two aspects, i. e. the over-generalization of legislation and the basic legal principles provided for in legislation. There are substantial differences between legal principles in this sense and those discussed by Dworkin. Whereas Dworkin''s discussion is aimed at emphasizing the certainty of law, the discussion in China emphasizes the fuzziness of law. The discussion on legal principles mainly involves the relationship between principles and rules in the process of legal reasoning. For the purpose of the rule of law, legal reasoning must take legal rules as its major premise. Legal principles can be used in legal reasoning when there is uncertainty, ambiguity and self-contradiction in legal rules. However, such principles must go through a process of determination before they can be used in legal reasoning. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《法学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《法学研究》下载全文 |
|
