客观真实性应作为证明力的评价标准

证据的相关性应作为证明力评价的标准理论上和司法实践认识都比较一致,证据的客观真实性及合法性能否作为证明力的评价标准,无论在理论界还是司法实务界都未能达成一致,客观真实性作为证据证明力的评价标准有其理论基础和实践根据,证据证明力的性质决定合法性也能够成为其评价的标准。     

教育改造质量评价标准研究

建立完善我国监狱教育改造质量评价标准体系，严格按照质量标准实施、检测、验收教育改造工作，是不断提高教育改造质量的关键。以“罪犯服刑期间教育改造质量评价标准”和“回归社会后教育改造质量评价标准”组成的双百分考核标准是评价教育改造质量的一个有益尝试，是监狱工作实践和理论研究的结晶。     

诉讼监督工作的评价模式和标准研究

建立适应诉讼监督工作特点的科学评价模式和标准,把结果性评价与过程性评价、静态评价与动态评价、个案监督评价与综合监督评价以及内部评价与外部评价有机统一起来,综合构建体现诉讼监督数量、质量、效率与效果相统一的考核评价体系,合理设定各项诉讼监督工作在数量、质量、效率和效果上的评价权重,形成良好的诉讼监督工作激励机制,对检察整体面貌的改进、加强和创新社会管理具有现实意义.     

以科学发展观为指导,健全和完善干部考核评价的科学标准与机制

本文着重分析和论述了以科学发展观为指导,健全和完善干部考核评价的科学标准与机制等问题,以期对解决新形势下干部考核评价工作中出现的各种问题有所裨益。     

论学术评价机制的完善

现代管理主义的兴起对学术产生了冲击,使得学术职业的传统和特有的价值理念受到了前所未有的冲击,使学术不端行为的产生成为必然。现行学术评价机制的缺陷主要包括考核指标体系不合理,评价方式和程序的异化。不合理的评价机制对学术不端起了推波助澜的作用。因此要建立新的学术评价机制;建立多样化的评价体系,使评价标准理性化。同时要建立正当的学术评价程序,学术问题只能由学者解决,专家评议必须有规范的程序。     

廉政风险防范管理机制建设中的难点

难点之一：如何确保廉政风险识别的真实性、客观性。按照现代管理理论，量化考核标准是保证风险点作用效益最大化的重要前提。适时、准确地识别风险，是廉政风险管理机制建设的关键。所以，廉政风险评估的真实性、客观性就显得尤为重要。有些廉政风险很难确定，如，在思想道德风险的排查中，如何评价党员干部是否丧失信仰、思想堕落，这需要一些客观标准，需要建立相应的指标体系。     

“失真”与“异化”:检察业务考核体系存在问题及解决思路

正所谓绩效考核,从管理学角度理解是指一定的组织运用特定的标准和指标,对组织成员工作行为及工作业绩进行评估,并运用评估的结果对成员未来的工作行为和工作业绩产生正面引导的过程。检察业务考核,是将管理学的绩效考核理论运用到检察业务的管理之中,通过设置一系列考核指标及分值,遵循一定的考核流程,从检察业务工作的数量、质量、效率、效果等各方面实现对检察业务工作的综合评价。近年来,最高人民检察院积极探索建立科学化的     

浅谈高职教育实训考核评价体系的研究与实践

目前我国的高职教育注重的是职业技术和高等教育的双重教学,其教育的核心目标就是对学生综合能力的培养。实训评价体系是高职教育中的重要组成部分,对高技术人才的培养有着十分重要的意义。文章通过对评价体系的阐述,进而对高职教育实训考核评价的现状进行了具体的分析,进一步确定教育实训的目标,将行业岗位技能的标准作为参考依据,与实训中学生反馈回来的信息结合在一起,形成一个科学合理的实训考核评价体系。     

人生价值评价标准初探

人生价值评价标准相对于不同的评价角度和评价主体有不同的意义。理解人生价值评价标准的发展规律和特点对人生价值观的教育具有重要意义。     

论罪数评价

罪数评价,是指根据一定的评价标准和评价原则,将特定的行为事实认定为一罪或数罪的过程。进行正确的罪数评价是罪数理论研究要解决的首要问题。应以犯罪构成作为罪数评价的标准,在司法实践中重点把握＂加减·普通的犯罪构成＂在罪数评价中的具体适用,并严格遵循全面评价原则和禁止重复评价原则。     

我国内地与澳门公务员绩效考核制度的比较分析

绩效考核是政府公务员绩效管理的重要环节和手段。本文拟在对内地与澳门公务员绩效考核制度进行系统比较的基础上,从中总结澳门在公务员绩效考核制度方面值得借鉴之处,并对如何完善我国公务员绩效考核制度提出一些思考性意见。     

精神障碍者民事行为能力标准化评定相关问题

民事行为能力评定案例逐年增多,相关研究却相对匮乏,尤其目前国内尚未见精神障碍者民事行为能力标准化评定相关研究。本文首先简要介绍了民事行为能力的概念及其评定分级,然后重点介绍了国内外民事行为能力评定的考察项目,最后从心理测量学角度出发,从理论和实践两个方面论证了制定民事行为能力评定量表的可行性。     

Evaluating prediction of technology transfer success: An interim evaluation of the dutch sensor technology program

Technology Foundation STW, a grant organization in the Netherlands, selects research proposals from universities on the basis of their scientific quality and their utilization potential. The proposals are in the field of applied science. STW also assists the research groups in the four years after the grant by bringing together the researchers and the potential users in half-day meeti gs twice a year at the university concerned. STW seeks methods to relate the differences in the research outcomes (“evaluation after”) to the differences in assessment rankings (“evaluation before”). This study will focus on the evaluation of a sensor technology program managed by STW as a subset of the larger set of all research projects funded by STW. We go back to the most basic and simple definition of utilization of outcome, namely whether the research results were or were not used by parties outside the university. This simple basis gives surprisingly positive results. First, it does indeed seem that for STW as a whole, the assessment beforehand is a predictor of the chance that the results will be used later. But this does not seem to be true as far as the subset of sensor technology projects is concerned. These findings can help us obtain more insight into what our selection process does and into what determines the success rate in terms of utilization six years after the research has ended.     

Accuracy of the static-99 in predicting recidivism in Switzerland

The Static-99 is a widely used actuarial risk assessment instrument. Various international validation studies have found satisfactory to good predictive validity for the Static-99, with the area under the curve (AUC) between 59% and 95%. This study is the first evaluation of the predictive accuracy of the Static-99 among sex offenders in Switzerland. The Static-99 scores of 69 violent/sex offenders in Switzerland were assessed using data from their psychiatric assessments. Recidivism was operationalized as reconviction assessed from penal records. The Static-99 risk levels were predictive for recidivism (AUC = .758) among our population. The results are discussed on the basis of the literature.     

我国公务员考核存在的主要问题与对策分析

公务员考核是正确评价公务员德才表现和工作实绩，促进勤政廉洁，提高工作效能，建设高素质公务员队伍的重要环节。经过多年的努力与探索，我国公务员考核工作取得了很大的成绩，特别是2006年《中华人民共和国公务员法》的实施和2007年1月《公务员考核规定（试行）》的颁布，把公务员考核工作推向了一个新的高度。但也应该看到。在公务员考核过程中仍然存在一些亟待解决的问题，制约了公务员考核工作的进一步开展。本文就当前我国公务员考核中存在的主要问题进行了梳理，分析了产生这些问题的原因，提出了解决问题的若干对策性建议。     

The significance of the legal term "corpse" in forensic medicine

The definition of the term "corpse" is relevant for medicine in general and most particularly so for forensic medicine, as it has direct consequences on practical work: legally, postmortems and autopsies may only be performed on corpses. With this in mind, the legal term "corpse" was examined on the basis of German State Law regulations and provisions. Approximately half the burial acts include a definition of "corpse", but even here there are certain variations. The definitions for "corpse" can be divided into four categories: 1) according to the lack of vital signs or sure signs of death 2) according to the degree of decomposition and/or cohesion of body parts 3) on the basis of severed body parts, and 4) terminological differentiation of stillbirths and neonatal fatalities from miscarriages. Laws vary greatly in their definition of the term "corpse". Therefore, the decision whether or not human remains or parts thereof qualify as a "corpse" should be left to medical discretion.     

256例儿童和少年道路交通事故伤残评定回顾性研究

目的 探讨儿童和少年道路交通事故活体损伤的流行病学、损伤及伤残评定特点。方法 对256例儿童和少年道路交通事故伤残评定资料进行回顾性研究。结果 男性多于女性,多见于6～18岁儿童,交通事故每天10～12时和16～18时最多,车辆类型以小汽车和货车多见,肇事方式多见于机动车与行人相撞,伤者的交通方式以步行多见,损伤部位以头部和四肢多见,损伤类型以骨折、挫伤、创多见,但内脏损伤相对较轻,下肢骨折远多于上肢。损伤程度多评定为轻伤,伤残程度以Ⅸ、Ⅹ级轻度伤残为主(33.2％)。结论 儿童和少年道路交通事故伤残评定应适当放宽标准,伤残评定标准应增加儿童和少年的有关条款。     

Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders

The use of actuarial risk/need assessment tools is an increasingly important part of the correctional landscape. Actuarial tools ideally will provide a valid, dynamic assessment of an offender's overall risk/need level, and will identify their most prevalent criminogenic needs. What results is typically a number or score that can be used to assign an offender to a risk level that is associated with an assumed likelihood of recidivism. Testing the predictive validity of actuarial risk/need assessment tools is of paramount concern, particularly when they are utilized with new (and under-researched) populations. The current study assessed the predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised using a sample of Native American and White offenders in a northern midwestern state. Results showed the instrument to have modest predictive validity utilizing the entire sample of offenders, with varying results for subsequent subgroups.     

The methodological basis for the expert assessment of unfavourable outcomes of the treatment

Procedures of forensic medical examination are considered with special reference to the cases of unfavourable outcomes of the treatment and methodological basis of their expert assessment. The step-by-step analysis of the doctor's actions is proposed for their objective evaluation. The objective opinion of the expert commission should be based on the medical criteria for the doctor's actions.     

Judges’ Perceptions of Screening,Assessment, Prevention,and Treatment for Substance Use, Mental Health,and HIV among Juveniles on Community Supervision: Results of a National Survey

Juvenile Justice‐Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ‐TRIALS) National Survey was funded in part to describe the current status of screening, assessment, prevention and treatment for substance use, mental health, and HIV for youth on community supervision within the US juvenile justice system. Surveys were administered to community supervision agencies and their primary behavioral healthcare providers, as well as the juvenile or family court judge with the largest caseload of youth on community supervision. This article presents the findings from the judges’ survey. Survey results indicated juvenile and family court judges were open to innovations for improving the court's performance, rated their relationships with collaborators highly, and appreciated the impact of screening, assessment, prevention, and treatment on judicial practices.