共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Wendy Povitsky Stickle Nadine M. Connell Denise M. Wilson Denise Gottfredson 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2008,4(2):137-163
Teen Court (TC) is a juvenile diversion program designed to prevent the formal processing of first-time juvenile offenders
within the juvenile justice system. TC instead utilizes informal processing and sanctions in order to prevent future offending.
Despite its widespread popularity throughout the United States of America, little rigorous research has been conducted on
the effectiveness of the TC model for reducing recidivism. Using an experimental design, this study examined the effectiveness
of TC in reducing recidivism and improving the attitudes and opinions of juvenile offenders in comparison with a control group
of youth who were formally processed. Self-reported delinquency was higher for those youth who participated in TC. TC youth
were also found to have significantly lower scores on a scale of belief in conventional rules than had youth who were processed
in the Department of Juveniles Services. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Wendy Povitsky Stickle is a doctoral candidate at the University of Maryland Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Her research interests include juvenile delinquency and delinquency prevention. Currently, Stickle is examining the effects of co-offending on trajectories of offending and is investigating the risk factors associated with weapon carrying in schools. Nadine M. Connell is an assistant professor at Rowan University in the Department of Law and Justice Studies. Her research interests include program and policy evaluation, the social dynamics of group behavior, and capital punishment. Connell has worked with the Capital Jury Project as well as several juvenile delinquency prevention initiatives. She is currently involved in an evaluation of the efficacy of school based programs on student bullying and adolescent ATOD use in the state of New Jersey. Denise M. Wilson is a Ph.D. graduate student at the University of Maryland Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Her research interests include juvenile delinquency, prevention and corrections. She is currently working on data analysis of a randomized experiment testing the effects of after-school programs on adolescent development. Denise C. Gottfredson is a professor at the University of Maryland Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology. Her research interests include delinquency and delinquency prevention, and particularly the effects of school environments on youth behavior. Gottfredson has conducted randomized experiments to test the effectiveness of the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court, the Strengthening Families Program, and is currently directing a randomized trial of the effects of after school programs on the development of problem behavior. 相似文献
Wendy Povitsky StickleEmail: |
Wendy Povitsky Stickle is a doctoral candidate at the University of Maryland Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Her research interests include juvenile delinquency and delinquency prevention. Currently, Stickle is examining the effects of co-offending on trajectories of offending and is investigating the risk factors associated with weapon carrying in schools. Nadine M. Connell is an assistant professor at Rowan University in the Department of Law and Justice Studies. Her research interests include program and policy evaluation, the social dynamics of group behavior, and capital punishment. Connell has worked with the Capital Jury Project as well as several juvenile delinquency prevention initiatives. She is currently involved in an evaluation of the efficacy of school based programs on student bullying and adolescent ATOD use in the state of New Jersey. Denise M. Wilson is a Ph.D. graduate student at the University of Maryland Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Her research interests include juvenile delinquency, prevention and corrections. She is currently working on data analysis of a randomized experiment testing the effects of after-school programs on adolescent development. Denise C. Gottfredson is a professor at the University of Maryland Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology. Her research interests include delinquency and delinquency prevention, and particularly the effects of school environments on youth behavior. Gottfredson has conducted randomized experiments to test the effectiveness of the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court, the Strengthening Families Program, and is currently directing a randomized trial of the effects of after school programs on the development of problem behavior. 相似文献
2.
Joseph Murray David P. Farrington Manuel P. Eisner 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2009,5(1):1-23
Systematic reviews summarize evidence about the effects of social interventions on crime, health, education, and social welfare.
Social scientists should also use systematic reviews to study risk factors, which are naturally occurring predictors of these
outcomes. To do this, the quality of risk factor research needs to be evaluated. This paper presents three new methodological
quality checklists to identify high-quality risk factor research. They are designed so that reviewers can separately summarize
the best evidence about correlates, risk factors, and causal risk factors. Studies need appropriate samples and measures to
draw valid conclusions about correlates. Studies need prospective longitudinal data to draw valid conclusions about risk factors.
And, in the absence of experimental evidence, controlled studies need to compare changes in risk factors over time with changes
in outcomes to draw valid conclusions about causal risk factors.
Joseph Murray is a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute of Criminology and a Research Fellow at Darwin College, University of Cambridge. He is the principal investigator on an Economic and Social Research Council (U.K.) grant called “Effects of negative life events on delinquent development: a cross-national programme of research”. He was awarded the Manuel Lopez-Rey Graduate Prize in Criminology (University of Cambridge) in 2002, the Nigel Walker prize (University of Cambridge) for his Ph.D. in 2007, and the Distinguished Young Scholar Award (American Society of Criminology, Division of Corrections and Sentencing) in 2008. David P. Farrington , O.B.E., is Professor of Psychological Criminology at the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, and Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh. He has received the Sellin-Glueck Award of the American Society of Criminology, the Sutherland Award of the American Society of Criminology, the Joan McCord Award of the Academy of Experimental Criminology, the Beccaria Gold Medal of the Criminology Society of German-Speaking Countries, the Senior Prize of the British Psychological Society Division of Forensic Psychology, the U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Outstanding Contributions Award and the Hermann Mannheim Prize of the International Centre for Comparative Criminology. His major research interest is in developmental criminology, and he is Director of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, which is a prospective longitudinal survey of over 400 London males from age 8 years to age 48 years. He is also co-Investigator of the Pittsburgh Youth Study, which is a prospective longitudinal study of over 1,500 Pittsburgh males from age 7 years to age 30 years. Manuel Eisner is a Reader in Sociological Criminology at the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge. His research interests include historical trends in violent crime, developmental criminology and early prevention of crime and violence. He is director of the Zürich Project on the Social Development of Children, a longitudinal study of 1,200 children in the city of Zürich. 相似文献
Joseph MurrayEmail: |
Joseph Murray is a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute of Criminology and a Research Fellow at Darwin College, University of Cambridge. He is the principal investigator on an Economic and Social Research Council (U.K.) grant called “Effects of negative life events on delinquent development: a cross-national programme of research”. He was awarded the Manuel Lopez-Rey Graduate Prize in Criminology (University of Cambridge) in 2002, the Nigel Walker prize (University of Cambridge) for his Ph.D. in 2007, and the Distinguished Young Scholar Award (American Society of Criminology, Division of Corrections and Sentencing) in 2008. David P. Farrington , O.B.E., is Professor of Psychological Criminology at the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, and Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh. He has received the Sellin-Glueck Award of the American Society of Criminology, the Sutherland Award of the American Society of Criminology, the Joan McCord Award of the Academy of Experimental Criminology, the Beccaria Gold Medal of the Criminology Society of German-Speaking Countries, the Senior Prize of the British Psychological Society Division of Forensic Psychology, the U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Outstanding Contributions Award and the Hermann Mannheim Prize of the International Centre for Comparative Criminology. His major research interest is in developmental criminology, and he is Director of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, which is a prospective longitudinal survey of over 400 London males from age 8 years to age 48 years. He is also co-Investigator of the Pittsburgh Youth Study, which is a prospective longitudinal study of over 1,500 Pittsburgh males from age 7 years to age 30 years. Manuel Eisner is a Reader in Sociological Criminology at the Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge. His research interests include historical trends in violent crime, developmental criminology and early prevention of crime and violence. He is director of the Zürich Project on the Social Development of Children, a longitudinal study of 1,200 children in the city of Zürich. 相似文献
3.
The effects of closed-circuit television on crime: meta-analysis of an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
David P. Farrington Martin Gill Sam J. Waples Javier Argomaniz 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2007,3(1):21-38
This article reports results obtained in an English national quasi-experimental multi-site evaluation of 14 closed-circuit
television (CCTV) projects in residential areas, town and city centers, a city hospital, and car parks (parking lots). Both
police and victimization data were collected before and after the installation of CCTV in target, control and buffer areas,
and police Divisions. The results showed that CCTV was effective in reducing crimes in train station car parks but not in
city centers or residential areas, seemed to be effective in reducing vehicle crimes (but not other types of crimes), and
was most effective when the degree of coverage by CCTV was high and when CCTV was combined with other interventions such as
improved lighting. Implications for situational crime prevention theory are drawn. There was no evidence of displacement or
diffusion of benefits. It is concluded that CCTV needs to be implemented more effectively, based on an analysis of the crime
problem and its causes, and needs to be evaluated using a randomized experimental design.
David P. Farrington is Professor of Psychological Criminology at Cambridge University. His major research interests are in the development of offending and the effectiveness of interventions. He is co-chair of the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group and a former President of the American Society of Criminology, the British Society of Criminology, the European Association of Psychology and Law, and the Academy of Experimental Criminology. Martin Gill is Director of Perpetuity Research and Consultancy International, a ‘spin-out’ company from the University of Leicester, where he was formerly a Professor of Criminology. He led the Home Office national evaluation of closed-circuit television (CCTV) and is currently researching offenders’ perspectives on fraud, shop theft and robbery. Sam J. Waples is currently a research assistant at Birkbeck College, University of London. His main interest lies in the application of geographical information systems (GIS) and spatial analysis. He is responsible for mapping as well as spatial and statistical analysis of geographical datasets for a variety of projects. He was formerly a research assistant at the Department of Criminology, University of Leicester. Javier Argomaniz is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, where he is conducting research on European Union counter-terrorism policies. He was formerly a research assistant in the Department of Criminology, University of Leicester. 相似文献
Javier ArgomanizEmail: |
David P. Farrington is Professor of Psychological Criminology at Cambridge University. His major research interests are in the development of offending and the effectiveness of interventions. He is co-chair of the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group and a former President of the American Society of Criminology, the British Society of Criminology, the European Association of Psychology and Law, and the Academy of Experimental Criminology. Martin Gill is Director of Perpetuity Research and Consultancy International, a ‘spin-out’ company from the University of Leicester, where he was formerly a Professor of Criminology. He led the Home Office national evaluation of closed-circuit television (CCTV) and is currently researching offenders’ perspectives on fraud, shop theft and robbery. Sam J. Waples is currently a research assistant at Birkbeck College, University of London. His main interest lies in the application of geographical information systems (GIS) and spatial analysis. He is responsible for mapping as well as spatial and statistical analysis of geographical datasets for a variety of projects. He was formerly a research assistant at the Department of Criminology, University of Leicester. Javier Argomaniz is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Nottingham, where he is conducting research on European Union counter-terrorism policies. He was formerly a research assistant in the Department of Criminology, University of Leicester. 相似文献
4.
In recent years a great deal of attention has turned to the need for policy-relevant research in criminology. Methodologically,
attention has been trained on the use of randomized experimental designs and cumulative systematic reviews of evidence to
accomplish this goal. Our work here reviews and demonstrates the utility of the Bayesian analytic framework, in the context
of crime prevention and justice treatment studies, as a means of furthering the goals of research synthesis and creation of
policy-relevant scientific statements. Evidence from various fields is used as a foundation for the discussion, and an empirical
example illustrates how this approach might be useful in practical criminological research. It is concluded that Bayesian
analysis offers a useful complement to existing approaches and warrants further inclusion in the ongoing discussion about
how best to assess program effectiveness, synthesize evidence, and report findings from crime and justice evaluations in a
way that is relevant to policy makers and practitioners.
Christopher J. Sullivan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, USA. He completed his doctorate at Rutgers University in 2005. His research interests include developmental criminology, juvenile delinquency and prevention policy, and research methodology and analytic methods. Recent publications have appeared in Criminology, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justiceand the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Dr. Thomas Mieczkowski is a Professor and Chair of Criminology at the University of South Florida, USA. His research interests have included drug smuggling, theories of syndicated crime organizations, drug distribution organizations and methods, drug epidemiology, and the validation of various drug detection technologies. Dr. Mieczkowski has published over 100 scholarly articles, book chapters, and three books. He received his Ph.D. from Detroit’s Wayne State University in 1985. 相似文献
Christopher J. SullivanEmail: |
Christopher J. Sullivan is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, USA. He completed his doctorate at Rutgers University in 2005. His research interests include developmental criminology, juvenile delinquency and prevention policy, and research methodology and analytic methods. Recent publications have appeared in Criminology, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justiceand the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. Dr. Thomas Mieczkowski is a Professor and Chair of Criminology at the University of South Florida, USA. His research interests have included drug smuggling, theories of syndicated crime organizations, drug distribution organizations and methods, drug epidemiology, and the validation of various drug detection technologies. Dr. Mieczkowski has published over 100 scholarly articles, book chapters, and three books. He received his Ph.D. from Detroit’s Wayne State University in 1985. 相似文献
5.
Testing for Analysts’ Bias in Crime Prevention Experiments: Can We Accept Eisner’s One-tailed Test? 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Eisner (Journal of Experimental Criminology, this issue, 2009) suggests that developer-led evaluations often make programs
look better than independent evaluations do because the former suffer systematic biases in favor of prevention success. Yet,
his proposed remedies suffer their own systematic bias, constituting a ‘one-tailed’ test of bias in only one direction. In
this response we suggest that a more objective assessment of ‘analysts’ effects’ requires a ‘two-tailed’ test of bias, in
which reviewers would measure indications of bias both for and against success in evaluations reported by both developers and independent evaluators. After exploring the full complexity of the distinction
between developers and evaluators, we report on one case in which independent evaluations were more favorable than those of
developers. We then suggest possible indicators of analysts’ biases against finding success that may characterize the work
of developers who “bend over backwards” to find harm in their programs, and of independent evaluators who may seek to “get
a scalp” of a developer or a program.
Lawrence W. Sherman is the Wolfson Professor of Criminology at Cambridge University, UK, and Director of its Jerry Lee Centre of Experimental Criminology at the Institute of Criminology. He is also Professor of Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania, USA. The founding President of the Academy of Experimental Criminology, he is the author of the forthcoming book Experimental Criminology and has designed or directed over 30 randomized field experiments. Heather Strang is Director of the Centre for Restorative Justice in the Regulatory Institutions Network (Regnet), Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, at the Australian National University. She is also a Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania and Senior Research Fellow in the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge University. Elected a Fellow of the Academy of Experimental of Criminology in recognition of her book Repair of Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice, she has led twelve randomized trials of restorative justice conferencing. She is currently directing an Australian Research Council study of both offenders and victims in the ten-year aftermath of four RCTs of restorative justice in Canberra. 相似文献
Lawrence W. ShermanEmail: |
Lawrence W. Sherman is the Wolfson Professor of Criminology at Cambridge University, UK, and Director of its Jerry Lee Centre of Experimental Criminology at the Institute of Criminology. He is also Professor of Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania, USA. The founding President of the Academy of Experimental Criminology, he is the author of the forthcoming book Experimental Criminology and has designed or directed over 30 randomized field experiments. Heather Strang is Director of the Centre for Restorative Justice in the Regulatory Institutions Network (Regnet), Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, at the Australian National University. She is also a Lecturer in Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania and Senior Research Fellow in the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge University. Elected a Fellow of the Academy of Experimental of Criminology in recognition of her book Repair of Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice, she has led twelve randomized trials of restorative justice conferencing. She is currently directing an Australian Research Council study of both offenders and victims in the ten-year aftermath of four RCTs of restorative justice in Canberra. 相似文献
6.
There has been relatively little change over recent decades in the methods used in research on self-reported delinquency.
Face-to-face interviews and self-administered interviews in the classroom are still the predominant alternatives envisaged.
New methods have been brought into the picture by recent computer technology, the Internet, and an increasing availability
of computer equipment and Internet access in schools. In the autumn of 2004, a controlled experiment was conducted with 1,203
students in Lausanne (Switzerland), where “paper-and-pencil” questionnaires were compared with computer-assisted interviews
through the Internet. The experiment included a test of two different definitions of the (same) reference period. After the
introductory question (“Did you ever...”), students were asked how many times they had done it (or experienced it), if ever,
“over the last 12 months” or “since the October 2003 vacation”. Few significant differences were found between the results
obtained by the two methods and for the two definitions of the reference period, in the answers concerning victimisation,
self-reported delinquency, drug use, failure to respond (missing data). Students were found to be more motivated to respond
through the Internet, take less time for filling out the questionnaire, and were apparently more confident of privacy, while
the school principals were less reluctant to allow classes to be interviewed through the Internet. The Internet method also
involves considerable cost reductions, which is a critical advantage if self-reported delinquency surveys are to become a
routinely applied method of evaluation, particularly so in countries with limited resources. On balance, the Internet may
be instrumental in making research on self-reported delinquency far more feasible in situations where limited resources so
far have prevented its implementation.
Sonia Lucia obtained a Master’s degree in criminology at the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Lausanne. Since 2003, she has been working on a project of juvenile delinquency in Switzerland and has been involved in an international project on juvenile delinquency [International Self-reported Delinquency-2 (ISRD2) study]. She is also working on a PhD thesis on bullying. Leslie Herrmann is trained in psychology and obtained a Master’s degree in criminology at the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Lausanne. Since 2004, she has been working on a project of juvenile delinquency in Switzerland. She is also working on a PhD thesis on the relationship between school and delinquency. Martin Killias is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Lausanne. Trained in law and sociology, he has published material in various areas of criminal law and criminology. His special interest is comparative research, such as the International Crime Victimization Survey, European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics and International Self-Reported Juvenile Delinquency Project. 相似文献
Sonia LuciaEmail: |
Sonia Lucia obtained a Master’s degree in criminology at the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Lausanne. Since 2003, she has been working on a project of juvenile delinquency in Switzerland and has been involved in an international project on juvenile delinquency [International Self-reported Delinquency-2 (ISRD2) study]. She is also working on a PhD thesis on bullying. Leslie Herrmann is trained in psychology and obtained a Master’s degree in criminology at the Institute of Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Lausanne. Since 2004, she has been working on a project of juvenile delinquency in Switzerland. She is also working on a PhD thesis on the relationship between school and delinquency. Martin Killias is Professor of Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Lausanne. Trained in law and sociology, he has published material in various areas of criminal law and criminology. His special interest is comparative research, such as the International Crime Victimization Survey, European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics and International Self-Reported Juvenile Delinquency Project. 相似文献
7.
Highly publicized incidents of serious school violence have resulted in the enactment of numerous rules and regulations, many
of which are overly restrictive in nature. These restrictive policies are based on an unsubstantiated belief that school violence
has become a national epidemic. Further, while offered under the guise of safety and security, these policies have resulted
in the limitations of students’ rights. The purpose of this paper is to explore those limitations. Utilizing Sykes’ typology,
“pains of imprisonment”, we discuss the deprivations that exist within the school institution. Recommendations for seeking
a balance between the rights of students and the needs of school administrators to maintain a safe school environment are
also offered.
Lisa Hutchinson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Correctional and Juvenile Justice Studies at Eastern Kentucky University. Prior to joining the faculty at EKU she taught at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Dr. Wallace received her Ph.D. in Urban Studies from the University of New Orleans in 2002 and her master’s degree in criminal justice and undergraduate degree in social and rehabilitative services from the University of Southern Mississippi. Her current research interests include program and training evaluation, school crime and violence, juvenile delinquency and the evaluation of differential oppression theory. Wesley E. Pullman LCSW, runs his own private practice in rural Virginia providing counseling and intensive in home family services to troubled youth and their families. He earned his undergraduate degree from Washington & Lee University and his Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University. He has practiced professionally in the areas of child welfare, juvenile justice, family therapy, and refugee resettlement. Dr. Pullman is the author of African American Men in Crisis: Proactive Strategies for Urban Youth and served on the faculties of numerous colleges and universities in Virginia, Maryland, Alaska and abroad. 相似文献
Lisa HutchinsonEmail: |
Lisa Hutchinson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Correctional and Juvenile Justice Studies at Eastern Kentucky University. Prior to joining the faculty at EKU she taught at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Dr. Wallace received her Ph.D. in Urban Studies from the University of New Orleans in 2002 and her master’s degree in criminal justice and undergraduate degree in social and rehabilitative services from the University of Southern Mississippi. Her current research interests include program and training evaluation, school crime and violence, juvenile delinquency and the evaluation of differential oppression theory. Wesley E. Pullman LCSW, runs his own private practice in rural Virginia providing counseling and intensive in home family services to troubled youth and their families. He earned his undergraduate degree from Washington & Lee University and his Ph.D. from Virginia Commonwealth University. He has practiced professionally in the areas of child welfare, juvenile justice, family therapy, and refugee resettlement. Dr. Pullman is the author of African American Men in Crisis: Proactive Strategies for Urban Youth and served on the faculties of numerous colleges and universities in Virginia, Maryland, Alaska and abroad. 相似文献
8.
Jodi Lane Susan Turner Terry Fain Amber Sehgal 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2007,3(3):201-219
In the late 1990s Ventura County, California, USA, implemented the South Oxnard Challenge Project (SOCP), designed to provide
intensive, multi-agency services to youth on probation. SOCP built their program guided by Clear’s “corrections of place”
model, which argued that community corrections could decrease offender risk by focusing on restorative principles rather than
on coercion. SOCP was designed as a randomized experiment, comparing youths in the experimental group with those on routine
probation. Researchers interviewed youths in both the experimental and control groups 1 year after random assignment. This
article reports on self-reported crime and drug use, finding few significant differences across groups. Specifically, we find
that SOCP youths were significantly more likely to indicate that they had committed a violent crime generally, although a
majority of both groups indicated they had done so. We found that those in SOCP who robbed people also did so significantly
more often than did the comparison group. In the control group, youths reported committing homicide significantly more often,
but this was a rare event. Among those youths who reported taking part in gang or posse fights, those in the control group
did so significantly more often. Finally, youths in the control group were significantly more likely to have used ecstasy
on more days during the previous month than were those in the SOCP.
Jodi Lane is Associate Professor in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of Florida (UF), USA. She was a criminal justice policy analyst for the RAND Corporation before joining the faculty at UF and was the onsite project coordinator for the South Oxnard Challenge Project (SOCP) evaluation. She earned her Ph.D. at the University of California, Irvine, USA. Her research interests include fear of crime, juvenile justice, corrections, crime policy, and program evaluation. She currently is part of the evaluation team for the Florida Faith and Community-Based Delinquency Treatment Initiative (FCBDTI). Susan Turner is a Professor of Criminology, Law and Society and Associate Director of the Center for Evidence-Based Corrections at the University of California, Irvine (UCI). Before joining UCI in 2005, Dr. Turner was a senior behavioral scientist at the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica, Calif., USA for over 20 years. She has led a variety of research projects, including studies on racial disparity, field experiments on private sector alternatives for serious juvenile offenders, work release, day fines and a 14-site evaluation of intensive supervision probation. Dr. Turner’s areas of expertise include the design and implementation of randomized field experiments and research collaborations with state and local justice agencies. Dr. Turner has conducted a number of evaluations of drug courts, including a nationwide implementation study. Her article, “A Decade of Drug Treatment Court Research” (2002) appeared in Substance Use and Misuse, summarizing over 10 years of drug court research conducted while she was at the RAND Corporation. Dr. Turner is a member of the American Society of Criminology, the American Probation and Parole Association, and is a Fellow of the Academy of Experimental Criminology. Terry Fain is a senior project manager in the Behavioral Sciences Department at the RAND Corporation. He has extensive research experience in criminal justice and substance abuse. He is expert in computer statistical techniques, as well as in managing large datasets. He has conducted analyses for many RAND projects and is author or co-author of numerous publications, both from RAND and in peer-reviewed journals. His research interests include alternatives to incarceration, substance abuse and treatment, racial disparities in prison admissions, and research collaborations with state and local justice agencies. Amber Sehgal has more than 10 years of experience defining evaluation parameters; identifying available data and sources of information; developing data tracking systems; overseeing data collection; supervising field staff; acting as a liaison between RAND and clients; and assisting in data analysis and report writing. Recent Public Safety and Justice projects include evaluation programs under the Challenge I Grant (Ventura County), Challenge II Grant (Orange County), Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (Ventura County and Los Angeles County) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Ventura County). A current RAND Health project studies the impact of city parks on physical health. 相似文献
Amber SehgalEmail: |
Jodi Lane is Associate Professor in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of Florida (UF), USA. She was a criminal justice policy analyst for the RAND Corporation before joining the faculty at UF and was the onsite project coordinator for the South Oxnard Challenge Project (SOCP) evaluation. She earned her Ph.D. at the University of California, Irvine, USA. Her research interests include fear of crime, juvenile justice, corrections, crime policy, and program evaluation. She currently is part of the evaluation team for the Florida Faith and Community-Based Delinquency Treatment Initiative (FCBDTI). Susan Turner is a Professor of Criminology, Law and Society and Associate Director of the Center for Evidence-Based Corrections at the University of California, Irvine (UCI). Before joining UCI in 2005, Dr. Turner was a senior behavioral scientist at the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica, Calif., USA for over 20 years. She has led a variety of research projects, including studies on racial disparity, field experiments on private sector alternatives for serious juvenile offenders, work release, day fines and a 14-site evaluation of intensive supervision probation. Dr. Turner’s areas of expertise include the design and implementation of randomized field experiments and research collaborations with state and local justice agencies. Dr. Turner has conducted a number of evaluations of drug courts, including a nationwide implementation study. Her article, “A Decade of Drug Treatment Court Research” (2002) appeared in Substance Use and Misuse, summarizing over 10 years of drug court research conducted while she was at the RAND Corporation. Dr. Turner is a member of the American Society of Criminology, the American Probation and Parole Association, and is a Fellow of the Academy of Experimental Criminology. Terry Fain is a senior project manager in the Behavioral Sciences Department at the RAND Corporation. He has extensive research experience in criminal justice and substance abuse. He is expert in computer statistical techniques, as well as in managing large datasets. He has conducted analyses for many RAND projects and is author or co-author of numerous publications, both from RAND and in peer-reviewed journals. His research interests include alternatives to incarceration, substance abuse and treatment, racial disparities in prison admissions, and research collaborations with state and local justice agencies. Amber Sehgal has more than 10 years of experience defining evaluation parameters; identifying available data and sources of information; developing data tracking systems; overseeing data collection; supervising field staff; acting as a liaison between RAND and clients; and assisting in data analysis and report writing. Recent Public Safety and Justice projects include evaluation programs under the Challenge I Grant (Ventura County), Challenge II Grant (Orange County), Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (Ventura County and Los Angeles County) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Ventura County). A current RAND Health project studies the impact of city parks on physical health. 相似文献
9.
Computer simulation models have changed the ways in which researchers are able to observe and study social phenomena such
as crime. The ability of researchers to replicate the work of others is fundamental to a cumulative science, yet this rarely
occurs in computer simulations. In this paper, we argue that, for computer simulations to be seen as a legitimate methodology
in social science, and for new knowledge to be generated, serious consideration needs to be given to how simulations could
or should be replicated. We develop the concept of systematic replication, a method for developing simulation experiments that move towards a generalisable inference that is directed, explicit, and incorporates complexity incrementally. Finally, we outline how the discrete parts of this process might be carried out in practice, using a simple simulation model.
Michael Townsley is a lecturer in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University. Before this he was a Senior Research Fellow at the University College London (UCL) Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London. He trained as a statistician, and his research has focused on crime analysis, problem-orientated policing and quantitative methods in a criminal justice setting, all with a view to preventing crime. His current research projects include the spatial and temporal modelling of crime and the analysis of large novel data sets. Daniel Birks is a Research Fellow at the UCL Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science. He has worked on a number of crime prevention research projects in conjunction with the Home Office and several police forces in the UK. His research interests include the development of innovative crime analysis and decision support techniques and tools, prospective models of crime, the application of simulation techniques within criminology, the study of offender predation patterns, and the use of data mining in crime analysis. 相似文献
Daniel J. BirksEmail: |
Michael Townsley is a lecturer in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University. Before this he was a Senior Research Fellow at the University College London (UCL) Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, University College London. He trained as a statistician, and his research has focused on crime analysis, problem-orientated policing and quantitative methods in a criminal justice setting, all with a view to preventing crime. His current research projects include the spatial and temporal modelling of crime and the analysis of large novel data sets. Daniel Birks is a Research Fellow at the UCL Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science. He has worked on a number of crime prevention research projects in conjunction with the Home Office and several police forces in the UK. His research interests include the development of innovative crime analysis and decision support techniques and tools, prospective models of crime, the application of simulation techniques within criminology, the study of offender predation patterns, and the use of data mining in crime analysis. 相似文献
10.
Early age‐of‐onset delinquency and substance use confer a major risk for continued criminality, alcohol and drug abuse, and other serious difficulties throughout the life course. Our objective is to examine the developmental roots of preteen delinquency and substance use. By using nationally representative longitudinal data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (N= 13,221), we examine the influence of early childhood developmental and family risks on latent pathways of antisocial tendencies from 3 to 7 years of age, and the influence of those pathways on property crime and substance use by 11 years of age. We identified a normative, nonantisocial pathway; a pathway marked by oppositional behavior and fighting; a pathway marked by impulsivity and inattention; and a rare pathway characterized by a wide range of antisocial tendencies. Children with developmental and family risks that emerged by 3 years of age—specifically difficult infant temperament, low cognitive ability, weak parental closeness, and disadvantaged family background—face increased odds of antisocial tendencies. Minimal overlap is found between the risk factors for early antisocial tendencies and those for preteen delinquency. Children on an antisocial pathway are more likely to engage in preteen delinquency and substance use by 11 years of age even after accounting for early life risk factors. 相似文献
11.
While it is generally argued that threats of legal sanctions are more effective with offenders involved in economic crimes
than with delinquents committing more conventional crimes, such an affirmation rests on weak empirical evidence. Also, most
studies supporting this proposition were conducted with non-experimental designs, thus, undermining the interval validity
of the results. On the other hand, studies base their predictions on individual factors and do not incorporate contextual
factors. To overcome those limitations, a randomized field experiment was implemented in four insurance companies to incorporate
contextual factors into the dynamics of deterrence. This study assessed the effect of a written threat (a deterrent letter
reminding insured persons of the punishment for insurance fraud) on claim padding behaviours of insured persons filing claims
for residential theft. A deterrent-letter project was implemented in four insurance companies, with claims randomly assigned
to the experimental or the control group. Cases belonging to the control group were managed as usual, while individuals in
the experimental group received the written threat. The experimental design made sure that the deterrent stimulus was exactly
delivered to the insured persons when they had the opportunity to exaggerate the value of their claims. Findings demonstrate
that claimants in the experimental group were less likely to pad their claims than were those in the control group. The letter
was effective, regardless of the means of delivery. In conclusion, the administration of a written threat at the moment of
criminal opportunity appears to be an effective strategy for preventing economic crimes.
Etienne Blais graduated in 2005 at the University of Montreal, where he obtained a Ph.D. in criminology. He is an assistant professor at the School of Criminology and a researcher at the International Centre for Comparative Criminology, both located at the University of Montreal. He is also a researcher at the National Institute of Public Health of Quebec. His research interests include road safety, crime and injury prevention, insurance fraud and research methods in criminology. Jean-Luc Bacher graduated in Law at Fribourg University, Switzerland, is Professor of Criminology at the école de criminologie, University of Montreal and researcher at the Centre international de criminologie comparée (CICC) in Montreal. His research interests include white-collar crime, economic crimes, sentencing and deterrence. He is currently working as a magistrate at the Tribunal pénal féderal of Bellinzona, Switzerland, and his recent research has been focused on the Canadian apparatus against money laundering. 相似文献
Jean-Luc BacherEmail: |
Etienne Blais graduated in 2005 at the University of Montreal, where he obtained a Ph.D. in criminology. He is an assistant professor at the School of Criminology and a researcher at the International Centre for Comparative Criminology, both located at the University of Montreal. He is also a researcher at the National Institute of Public Health of Quebec. His research interests include road safety, crime and injury prevention, insurance fraud and research methods in criminology. Jean-Luc Bacher graduated in Law at Fribourg University, Switzerland, is Professor of Criminology at the école de criminologie, University of Montreal and researcher at the Centre international de criminologie comparée (CICC) in Montreal. His research interests include white-collar crime, economic crimes, sentencing and deterrence. He is currently working as a magistrate at the Tribunal pénal féderal of Bellinzona, Switzerland, and his recent research has been focused on the Canadian apparatus against money laundering. 相似文献
12.
New Evidence on the Monetary Value of Saving a High Risk Youth 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
There is growing interest in crime prevention through early youth interventions; yet, the standard United States response
to the crime problem, particularly among juveniles, has been to increase the use and resource allocation allotted toward punishment
and incapacitation and away from prevention and treatment. At the same time, longitudinal studies of delinquency and crime
have repeatedly documented a strong link between past and future behavior and have identified a small subset of offenders
who commit a large share of criminal offenses. These findings suggest that if these offenders can be identified early and
correctly and provided with prevention and treatment resources early in the life course, their criminal activity may be curtailed.
While researchers have studied these offenders in great detail, little attention has been paid to the costs they exert on
society. This paper provides estimates of the cost of crime imposed on society by high risk youth. Our approach follows and
builds upon the early framework and basic methodology developed by Cohen (J Quant Criminol 14: 5–33, 1998), by using new estimates of the costs of individual crimes, ones that are more comprehensive and that significantly increased
the monetary cost per crime. We also use new estimates on the underlying offending rate for high risk juvenile offenders.
We estimate the present value of saving a 14-year-old high risk juvenile from a life of crime to range from $2.6 to $5.3 million.
Similarly, saving a high risk youth at birth would save society between $2.6 and $4.4 million.
相似文献
Mark A. CohenEmail: |
13.
The research presented within this paper was conducted as part of a 2-year project (Project MARC) to develop and render operational
a mechanism to assess the risk of theft of electronic products. Clarke and Newman (Secured goods by design - a plan for security
coding of electronic products. London: Department of Trade and Industry, 2002) proposed the use of two checklists—one to measure
vulnerability, the other to measure security—as a means of categorising products according to their vulnerability to theft.
Consultation with key stakeholders yielded the common view that such a mechanism was worth pursuing, but that it must reflect
the language of those who would use it. An extensive consultation with stakeholders from ten European member states ensued.
Participants were asked to rate a range of electronic products in terms of vulnerability and security, and to explain their
ratings. Their responses were used to develop two checklists that incorporate a variety of factors, weighted according to
the frequency with which they were expressed. The crime vulnerability checklist developed within this paper is judged fit-for-purpose
as a provisional measurement but we urge caution in relation to the security checklist.
Dr. Rachel Armitage is a Senior Research Fellow at the Applied Criminology Centre, University of Huddersfield. Professor Ken Pease is Visiting Professor at the University of Loughborough. 相似文献
Ken PeaseEmail: |
Dr. Rachel Armitage is a Senior Research Fellow at the Applied Criminology Centre, University of Huddersfield. Professor Ken Pease is Visiting Professor at the University of Loughborough. 相似文献
14.
15.
Richard Berk 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2008,4(3):289-308
Computational criminology applies computer simulations to study topics of interest for criminologists. Just as for all computer
modelling in science, the validity of the simulations ultimately depends on whether they are able to reproduce empirical phenomena
with sufficient accuracy. The only way in which this can be determined is by comparing model output to real observations.
This paper provides an overview of how such model evaluations can be undertaken.
Richard Berk is a professor in the Departments of Statistics and Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania. Professor Berk is an elected fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Statistical Association and the Academy of Experimental Criminology, and has been a member the Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics of the National Research Council and the Social Science Research Council’s Board of Directors. He has received the Paul F. Lazarsfeld Award given by the Methodology Section of the American Sociological Association. Professor Berk’s current work focuses on statistical learning procedures and other forms of inductive data analysis. 相似文献
Richard BerkEmail: |
Richard Berk is a professor in the Departments of Statistics and Criminology at the University of Pennsylvania. Professor Berk is an elected fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Statistical Association and the Academy of Experimental Criminology, and has been a member the Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics of the National Research Council and the Social Science Research Council’s Board of Directors. He has received the Paul F. Lazarsfeld Award given by the Methodology Section of the American Sociological Association. Professor Berk’s current work focuses on statistical learning procedures and other forms of inductive data analysis. 相似文献
16.
Julia Wardhaugh 《Asian Journal of Criminology》2007,2(1):57-69
This paper is a reflection on the difficulties of conducting criminological research in rural India. It tells the story of
two periods of ethnographic fieldwork (1999 and 2002) conducted in one North Indian village (pseudonym: Nagaria). This article
is written in the ‘tales from the field’ narrative tradition, relying primarily on my own fieldwork experience and later reflections,
and intentionally making little reference to the methodological literature. Much of the paper - particularly the fieldwork
extracts - is written in the ‘ethnographic present’. A dramaturgical approach is adopted (Goffman 1959), with a focus on the ways in which social interaction may be understood as performance. Theatrical terminology is used to
underscore the ways in which field relationships may be stage managed. Contrary to conventional notions of the power of the
researcher, in this tale from the field it becomes clear that the superior acting skills of gatekeepers and key informants
led to the upstaging of this ethnographer.
Julia Wardhaugh is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology and Criminal Justice at University of Wales Bangor, United Kingdom. Her research interests include rural and urban crime and deviance in South Asia, and the criminalization of street homelessness in urban and rural Britain. 相似文献
Julia WardhaughEmail: |
Julia Wardhaugh is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology and Criminal Justice at University of Wales Bangor, United Kingdom. Her research interests include rural and urban crime and deviance in South Asia, and the criminalization of street homelessness in urban and rural Britain. 相似文献
17.
Statistical inference and meta-analysis 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Richard Berk 《Journal of Experimental Criminology》2007,3(3):247-270
Statistical inference is a common feature of meta-analysis. Statistical inference depends on a formal model that accurately
characterizes certain key features of how the studies to be summarized were generated. The implications of this requirement
are discussed and questions are raised about the credibility of confidence intervals and hypothesis tests routinely reported.
Richard Berk is a professor in the Departments of Criminology and Statistics at the University of Pennsylvania. He is an elected fellow of the American Statistical Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Academy of Experimental Criminology. His research interests include statistical learning procedures and applied statistics more generally. He has published extensively in program evaluation, criminal justice, environmental research, and applied statistics. Professor Berk’s most recent book is Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique (Sage Publications, 2003). 相似文献
Richard BerkEmail: |
Richard Berk is a professor in the Departments of Criminology and Statistics at the University of Pennsylvania. He is an elected fellow of the American Statistical Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Academy of Experimental Criminology. His research interests include statistical learning procedures and applied statistics more generally. He has published extensively in program evaluation, criminal justice, environmental research, and applied statistics. Professor Berk’s most recent book is Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique (Sage Publications, 2003). 相似文献
18.
Walter DeKeseredy Joseph F. Donnermeyer Martin D. Schwartz Kenneth D. Tunnell Mandy Hall 《Critical Criminology》2007,15(4):295-311
After decades of neglect, a growing number of scholars have turned their attention to issues of crime and criminal justice
in the rural context. Despite this improvement, rural crime research is underdeveloped theoretically, and is little informed
by critical criminological perspectives. In this article, we introduce the broad tenets of a multi-level theory that links
social and economic change to the reinforcement of rural patriarchy and male peer support, and in turn, how they are linked
to separation/divorce sexual assault. We begin by addressing a series of misconceptions about what is rural, rural homogeneity
and commonly held presumptions about the relationship of rurality, collective efficacy (and related concepts) and crime. We
conclude by recommending more focused research, both qualitative and quantitative, to uncover specific link between the rural
transformation and violence against women.
This paper was presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Los Angeles, California. Some
of the research reported here was supported by National Institute of Justice Grant 2002-WG-BX-0004 and financial assistance
provided by the College of Arts and Sciences and the Office of the Vice President for Research at Ohio University. Arguments
and findings included in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the US Department
of Justice or Ohio University. Please send all correspondence to Walter S. DeKeseredy, e-mail: walter.dekeseredy@uoit.ca.
All of the names of the women who participated in DeKeseredy and colleagues’ rural Ohio study and who are quoted have been
changed to maintain confidentiality.
相似文献
Walter DeKeseredy (Corresponding author)Email: |
Joseph F. DonnermeyerEmail: |
Martin D. SchwartzEmail: |
Kenneth D. TunnellEmail: |
Mandy HallEmail: |
19.
20.
Annemieke Benschop Lana D. Harrison Dirk J. Korf Patricia G. Erickson 《European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research》2006,12(1):61-78
Despite their common multi-ethnic populations, the meaning and application of the term ethnicity varies between the United States, Canada and the Netherlands. This paper attempts the construction of a racial/ethnic measure that enables meaningful cross-national comparisons. As part of the Drugs, Alcohol and Violence International (DAVI) project, the link between different measures of ethnicity and alcohol use, drug use, violence, and delinquency was studied within samples of 14- to 17-year-old juvenile detainees and dropouts in Philadelphia, Toronto and Amsterdam. Results showed a relationship between origin (the most discriminating of ethnicity measures) and alcohol and drug use, but not violence-related behaviour. Differences in substance use and violence were more attributable to differences between countries and samples than between ‘western’ and ‘non-western’ youth.Annemieke Benschop (MSc) is a researcher at the Bonger Institute of Criminology at the University of Amsterdam. Lana D. Harrison (MA, PhD) is Associate Director of the Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies and a Professor at the University of Delaware (Newark, DE). Dirk J. Korf (MA, PhD) is an Associate Professor and Research Director at the Bonger Institute of Criminology at the University of Amsterdam, and an Associate Professor in Criminology at Utrecht University. Patricia Erickson (MA, PhD) is a Senior Scientist with the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto (Canada) and a cross-appointed Professor in Sociology and Criminology at the University of Toronto. 相似文献