对挪用特定款物罪侦查权之分析

挪用特定款物罪的侦查权按《刑诉法》规定归属于公安机关,从立法角度和司法实践上看,其明显有不科学之处,检察机关应当成为该罪的侦查主体。一、挪用特定款物罪的特点依据《刑法》第二百七十三条规定,挪用特定款物罪是指违反财经管理制度,挪用国家救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、扶贫、移民、救济款物,情节严重,致使国家和人民群众利益遭受重大损失的行为。挪用特定款物的构成要件如下:1、侵犯的客体是专款专用的财经制度;2、犯罪的客观要件表现为将自己经管的上述救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、扶贫、移民、救济款物,不经合法批准,擅自调拨、使用于其…     

殊途同归:论挪用性质的犯罪的立法完善

挪用性质的犯罪在我国刑法中包括挪用公款罪、挪用资金罪、挪用特定款物罪,而其内容及现行相关司法解释均不能恰当解决立法界限模糊、罪刑关系失衡等问题,本文主张三罪合而为一．方能解决上述问题.     

谈挪用特定款物罪的有关规定

挪用特定款物罪是由原刑法第126条修改而来,修改后的刑法将其归入侵犯财产罪中.刑法将挪用特定款物的行为规定为犯罪,对于保护公共财产,保证这些特定款物的正确合理使用,防止有关人员挪用挥霍这些款物,完善其刑事责任,都具有重要的现实意义.     

挪用特定款物罪应归类于贪污贿赂犯罪

挪用救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、扶贫、移民、救济款物犯罪,在刑法中涉及两个罪名,一是侵犯财产罪中的“挪用特定款物罪”(第273条),一是贪污贿赂犯罪中的挪用公款罪(第384条第2款)。刑法将同一种行为     

挪用型犯罪相关问题研究

挪用型犯罪因其自身所具有的不同于其他财产犯罪的特征,因而能够独立成为财产犯罪中的一大类型.挪用资金罪、挪用特地款物罪、挪用公款罪是挪用型犯罪的典型形态,本文以其为研究对象,从其犯罪对象、行为、主体等具体方面,对三者之间的共性及区别作出界分,以期对在市场经济越发发达这一背景下的司法实践有所帮助.     

关才挪用特定款物罪立法完善的思考

本文对挪用特定款物罪立法的不足进行了分析,认为应对该罪的归类、构成要件及刑事责任的立法 进行完善。     

关于挪用特定款物罪立法完善的思考

本文对挪用特定款物罪立法的不足进行了分析,认为应对该罪的归类、构成要件及刑事责任的立法进行重新完善.     

挪用公款罪若干问题研究

挪用公款罪作为常见、多发犯罪,在司法实践中存在诸多的争议问题.本文依据立法及司法解释,结合实践中存在的问题,对挪用公款罪的主体、挪用对象物、挪用的数额计算、共同犯罪及一罪数罪问题进行了探讨,并提出了具体的司法适用意见.     

建议修改《刑法》第126条

我国刑法第126条规定的挪用救灾、救济款物罪,从文字表达的意思看,对违反财经管理制度将救灾、抢险、防汛、优抚、救济款物挪用的,既可理解为归国家或集体单位使用,也可理解为归个人使用。也就是说,擅自挪用上述五种特定款物,无论是归公使用还是归个人使用,情节严重,致使国家和人民群众利益遭受重大损害的,都构成挪用救灾、救济款物罪。但从目前来看,根据全国人大常委会通过的《关于惩治贪污罪贿赂罪的补充规定》(以下简称《补充规定》)     

论我国惩治腐败犯罪刑事立法的完善--以《联合国反腐败公约》为参照

我国惩治腐败犯罪的刑事立法与《联合国反腐败公约》基本相适应,但也存在着若干罪名欠缺、贿赂犯罪构成要件过窄、贪污、挪用犯罪对象范围过窄等缺陷。为履行国际公约义务,与《联合国反腐败公约》的相关内容接轨,我国惩治腐败犯罪的刑事立法应增设对外国公职人员、国际公共组织官员行贿罪,外国公职人员、国际公共组织官员受贿罪,增设影响力交易罪,扩大贿赂犯罪的构成要件,扩大贪污、挪用罪的犯罪对象。     

探索中国特色的反腐败之路

官员腐败是一种特别令民众痛恨的社会现象。其本质与盗窃、抢劫等犯罪并无差异，而且是借助官员手中权力实施的，因此对社会危害更大。一个人偷偷地把他人的钱财拿走了，据为已有，那是盗窃；一个官员利用职权把大家的钱财拿走了，据为己有，那就是贪污。一个人以暴力相威胁，让他人把钱财交给自己，那是抢劫；一个官员以职权隐含的暴力相威胁，     

Water always finds its way: Identifying new forms of money laundering

Money laundering regulations have become stricter over time and involve more and more actors. This means that the accountability of laundering regulation will become more important; theoretically, money laundering should have decreased with the implementation of new regulations. However, as this paper shows, it is difficult to estimate even the sign of the trend in the proceeds of crime and of laundering over time with particular reference to the drug trade. There seems to be a substitution from hard to softer drugs, and no substantial decline in the proceeds of crime and likewise no substantial decline in money laundering. Criminals seem to switch from the more controlled banking sector into still less controlled parts of financial markets, and from financial markets to other sectors. These new sectors include electronic payments, trade and real estate. The paper shows how one can empirically approach the latter two by using economic information of unusual prices and other characteristics in order to identify the amount of laundering in these sectors. Combining economic information with criminological data facilitates the development of a new tool for identifying money laundering in some important sectors.     

Money launderers and tax havens: Two sides of the same coin?

This paper investigates whether tax havens have an incentive to maintain low regulatory standards in order to attract black money activities. Using a new dataset on money laundering regulation, the results of this study show that tax haven and money laundering services coincide within the same country. This effect is especially observable for regulative instruments which increase the probability of detecting money laundering; whereas in the case of punitive regulation for money laundering the complementary relationship is weaker, perhaps due to a “false friends” effect. If we classify tax havens according to their per capita GDP, poorer tax havens in particular tend to supply both services, because the gains from their tax haven status are low compared to those of wealthier and well-established tax havens. From a policy perspective the results add new insights to the debate on the welfare effects of tax havens since the results suggest that poorer tax havens might be reluctant to provide the necessary regulatory environment in order to constrain money laundering. This externality is beyond the familiar tax revenue effects caused by tax havens.     

"贿赂"范围的比较研究与新探

在外国刑法理论与刑事立法上,"贿赂"的范围一般不仅仅限于财物,而基本上对贿赂进行扩大性理解和适用。就我国而言,如果将"贿赂"作不加任何限制的宽泛性理解则不符我国刑法理念;"财物"不仅应包括财产性利益,也应包括一部分非财产性利益;对"贿赂"的具体判定应以受贿人为依据;同时,对刑法第385条和第387条所言的"财物",必须根据具体情况予以区别对待。     

行政权滥用的预测与防范

行政主体面对在执法中潜在的隐患和未来的不利因素时,因缺乏较好的认知意识和防范机制,在面对权力欲、金钱欲和物质欲望的刺激时容易丧失免疫力,导致以权谋私、权钱交易等为求利益而滥用行政权的问题产生。行政权滥用严重干扰了经济与社会的健康发展,阻碍了国家法治目标的实现。行政权滥用具有事先预防的可能性,本文以政府自身建设为基点,通过对执法程序中可能存在行政权滥用的环节进行事前预测和分析,提出了科学有效的事前防范与控制机制,以此作为实现依法行政的制度保障。     

货币发展形态的法律分析──兼论电子货币对法律制度的影响

以计算机技术为标志的新技术革命正深刻影响着人类生活的各个方面，改变了人们的生活方式，也使货币的形态与银行的业务运作发生了革命性的变化。正如纸币取代黄金，票据取代纸币一样，电子货币正取代纸币和票据而成为未来货币。本文从分析货币的法律概念入手，以此为基础，在回顾货币演变与发展过程中的不同形态并进行法律分析后，对现在日常生活中使用的各种“电子货币”及类似术语进行了辨析，指出只有数字现金型“电子货币”符合货币的法律概念，是新的货币形态，因而是真正的电子货币。文章还就电子货币对现存法律制度的影响从货币法律关系与交易法律关系两个方面进行了论述。     

Organized crime,money laundering and legal economy: theory and simulations

This paper proposes a dynamic model to simulate the relationships between the profits of organized crime, money laundering and legal investments. We develop a macro framework in which organized crime can increase its possibilities to invest in the legal sector by resorting to effective but costly money laundering schemes. The model explores the conditions under which the effectiveness of money laundering causes a positive trend in the legal assets owned by the criminal organizations. We use the model to simulate the total amount of legal wealth generated by organized crime through drug trafficking in different world regions, with particular attention to Europe.     

对我国货币市场基金进行法律规范的理论分析

由于我国货币市场基金刚刚起步,因此对于我国货币市场基金进行法律规范是十分必要的,通过对货币市场基金法律规范的理论进行分析,期望未来尽早建立与货币市场基金本身特点相适应的完善的法律规范.     

我国反洗钱措施的完善势在必行

面对日益严峻的国际国内洗钱活动,迅速制定抗制洗钱犯罪的对策,完善反洗钱的种种措施已属我国势在必然的举措。