接触部位皮肤上DNA破获凶杀案件1例

1案件简介 某年12月18日某村发生一起杀人案件,死者姚某（女,83岁）被发现死在室内床上,姚某为独居老人,门锁完好,室内条件现场非常简陋,地面为泥土地面,凹凸不平,室内中央摆放一张床,尸体头东脚西仰面躺在床上,衣着完好。通过勘验,现场内翻动较大,技术分析为盗窃转化为抢劫杀人,现场勘验未采集到常规显性痕迹。     

子弹击发对弹壳接触DNA提取检验效率的影响

正在涉枪类等恐怖分子犯罪中,弹壳是最重要生物物证之一,这类生物检材的DNA提取和检验存在一定的难度。此外子弹击发的瞬间高温可能使得接触DNA破坏以及子弹击发过程的剧烈震动使得弹壳上粘附的细胞脱落,也导致弹壳接触DNA的有效提取难度加大,成为困扰广大检验人员的难点。本文拟通     

DNA IQ磁珠法结合Maxwell~（TM） 16自动仪提取接触DNA

目的研究DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪对接触DNA提取的应用价值。方法 151份案件接触DNA检材95℃裂解后,采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪提取DNA,然后进行DNA定量和STR分型检测,统计各种类型的接触DNA含量I、PC CT值和STR分型成功率。结果 151份案件接触DNA检材中,除果核平均DNA获得量为9.51ng以外,其它接触检材的平均DNA获得量均大于10ng,烟蒂检验成功率最高为93%,果核检验成功率较低,为60%。所有DNA样品的IPC CT值均在27左右,纯度高。结论大部分接触DNA检材采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪可提取到足以进行STR分型的DNA。     

Chelex法和两种磁珠法提取接触DNA效果的比较

目的比较Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对接触DNA的提取效果。方法将稀释为10ng、100ng的标准品DNA,分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法处理;对30例烟蒂和30例牙刷分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法和EQ国产磁珠法提取DNA,然后进行PCR定量和STR检测。结果Chelex法对DNA的提取无损失,DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对DNA的提取均有不同程度的损失;烟蒂、牙刷等检材采用Chelex法提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值显著高于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法,但STR检验成功率却低于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法。2种磁珠法提取的DNA量、IPC CT值和STR检验成功率无显著性差异。结论污染轻、杂质少的接触DNA检材,用Chelex法提取最为方便快捷;IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法更适合污染接触DNA检材的提取及自动化操作。     

67例皮肤接触样本的采集及DNA提取方法的比较分析

<正>DNA分型检验已广泛应用于法医学实践检案,尤其皮肤脱落细胞DNA分型检验,对侦查破案有重要意义[1]。而对于此类检材,选择检材预处理及DNA提取方法至关重要。本文针对常见的皮肤接     

人体接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响

目的比较3种常见的接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响。方法收集烟蒂、牙刷、纱线手套各10份;分别采用95℃、70℃直接裂解和TNE、SDS、PK预消化方式进行前处理,再用磁珠法提取纯化DNA,并进行DNA定量,统计提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值;同时用Sinofiler复合扩增系统进行STR分型检测。结果 3种方法前处理后用磁珠提取的DNA纯度均较高I,PC CT值在26.63～27.19之间。用预消化法获得的DNA量高于裂解法,而95℃裂解与70℃裂解方法提取的DNA量无显著性差异。STR扩增检测结果亦表明,采用预消化法处理的样品STR分型成功率高于裂解法9,5℃与70℃裂解方法处理的样品STR分型成功率无显著性差异。结论人体接触检材采用预消化磁珠法提取DNA,有助于提高STR检验成功率。     

接触DNA检验成功率的影响因素探讨

人在接触物体后,会在物体表面留下少量的接触DNA,对它的检验是目前法医DNA检验的热点和难点。在不同情况下,接触DNA的STR检验成功率差异较大。影响接触DNA检验成功率的主要因素有个体差异、载体属性、接触时间、遗留时间、检验时能否突出重点部位、检验策略的选取和结果分析等,本文详细综述了接触DNA检验成功率的影响因素。     

弹壳接触DNA的法医学研究进展

弹壳是涉枪类犯罪案件的重要物证,弹壳上接触DNA的成功分析有助于排查嫌疑人和重建枪击案犯罪现场.随着DNA提取方法的改进和扩增试剂盒灵敏度的提高,有望通过检验弹壳接触DNA获得更具价值的信息.实际案件中,弹壳接触DNA的检测常面临微量、降解、混合以及射击残留物干扰等问题,为DNA信息的检验与鉴定带来挑战.本文围绕弹壳接...     

触摸痕中接触DNA检验概述

接触DNA是指人体与客体相接触后遗留在客体表面的细胞内含有的遗传物质。接触DNA的检验鉴定作为一项较新的技术,在日常工作实践中已被广泛应用。基于接触DNA检验的相关研究在国内外均受到重视,本文借助相关文献,对皮肤触摸痕中接触DNA的形成原理、发现与提取、检验中的影响因素以及对检验结果正确地解读和利用等问题进行阐述,以期为相关研究和应用提供参考和借鉴。     

触摸痕中接触DNA检验概述

接触DNA是指人体与客体相接触后遗留在客体表面的细胞内含有的遗传物质。接触DNA的检验鉴定作为一项较新的技术,在日常工作实践中已被广泛应用。基于接触DNA检验的相关研究在国内外均受到重视,本文借助相关文献,对皮肤触摸痕中接触DNA的形成原理、发现与提取、检验中的影响因素以及对检验结果正确地解读和利用等问题进行阐述,以期为相关研究和应用提供参考和借鉴。     

从法医相关性昆虫体内提取人类DNA的研究进展

本文从嗜血性昆虫、嗜尸性昆虫、嗜骨性昆虫及实验技术等多角度阐述了从法医相关性昆虫嗉囔中提取人类DNA的可行性及国际研究和应用进展。     

纳米磁珠提取法在骨骼DNA提取中的应用

目的对纳米磁珠法提取纯化骨骼DNA的效果进行比较评价,为方法选择提供应用参考。方法取泥土掩埋、水中浸泡1~10年不等的25根长骨,经水洗、刮净,液氮冷冻研磨器将骨骼研磨成粉末状,分别应用纳米磁珠提取法和King Fisher仪器自动化提取法提取DNA,IdentifilerPlus试剂盒进行扩增,ABI 3100遗传分析仪进行STR分型检测;对两种方法提取的DNA定量和经扩增、分型检测的结果进行比较。结果骨骼样本采用纳米磁珠法提取到的样本DNA(1.237 5ng/μL±0.319 2ng/μL),较之King Fisher法的浓度(0.506 2ng/μL±0.280 5ng/μL)更高,两种方法间差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);而纳米磁珠法的分型成功率亦更高,两种方法间差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论用纳米磁珠提取纯化骨骼DNA,能得到高质量DNA模板,有利于提高分型检验的成功率,可在实际检案中选择使用。     

Recovery of human DNA profiles from poached deer remains: A feasibility study

Poaching is a crime that occurs worldwide and can be extremely difficult to investigate and prosecute due to the nature of the evidence available. If a species is protected by international legislation such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora then simply possessing any part of that species is illegal. Previous studies have focused on the identification of endangered species in cases of potential poaching. Difficulties arise if the poached animal is not endangered. Species such as deer have hunting seasons whereby they can legally be hunted however poaching is the illegal take of deer, irrespective of season. Therefore, identification of deer alone has little probative value as samples could have originated from legal hunting activities in season. After a deer is hunted it is usual to remove the innards, head and lower limbs. The limbs are removed through manual force and represent a potential source of human touch DNA.We investigate the potential to recover and profile human autosomal DNA from poached deer remains. Samples from the legs of ten culled deer were obtained (40 in total) using minitapes. DNA from samples was extracted, quantified and amplified to determine if it would be possible to recover human STR profiles.Low quantification data led to the use of an extended PCR cycling protocol of 34 cycles. Samples from seven deer amplified, however some samples were excluded from further analysis due to ‘drop in’ alleles or the low level of successfully amplified loci. Samples from five deer could be further analysed and gave match probabilities ranging from 6.37 × 10^{− 3} to 9.53 × 10^{− 11}.This study demonstrates the potential of recovering human touch DNA from poached animal remains. There is the potential for this test to be used in relation to other species of poached remains or other types of wildlife crimes. This is the first time, to our knowledge, that human STR profiling has been successfully applied to touch DNA in regards to simulated wildlife crime.     

混合斑的研究进展

混合斑组成复杂,长期以来是法医物证研究的难题之一。混合斑主要分为两类:一是性侵害案件中大量女性阴道上皮细胞混合少量精子;二是普通来源的生物检材之间的混合,如血-血、唾液-血液混合等。近些年来,对混合斑的研究日渐深入,技术层面或理论分析都更加客观和多元化。针对第一类混合斑,出现了荧光/磁性激活、显微操纵、声波差异分离法等分离精子的新技术;第二类混合斑是研究的难点,近年来大规模平行测序、液滴微流控技术、乳液PCR(e PCR)、全基因组扩增等技术的出现,提高了次要成分的检出机率。此外,遗传标记也有相应的发展,传统遗传标记常染色体STR、Y-STR、SNP等检测位点越来越丰富,新兴遗传标记DIP、DIP-STR、SNPSTR、mt DNA-SNP、微单倍型等在混合斑研究中发挥的作用初步显露出来。文章最后涉及混合斑分析理论和计算软件的最新发展。     

陈旧性骨骼DNA提取技术的研究

对陈旧性骨骼建立一个高回收率并能除去 PCR 反应抑制物的提取 DNA 的方法。采用 CTAB 法提取 DNA。结果显示,该方法不但能有效去除 PCR 抑制物,而且对水泡、火烧、土埋以及10年左右的骨骼所提取的 DNA 均能成功地进行荧光标记 STR 多基因座扩增检验。实验表明,该方法稳定,重复性好,适合陈旧骨骼标本的 DNA 提取。     

Efficiency of DNA IQ System in recovering semen DNA from cotton swabs

With the aim to asses the efficiency of the DNA IQ System in the recovery of DNA from semen samples, cotton swabs were prepared from 1/5 serial dilutions of semen. Each swab was fractionated in four equivalent quarters and the DNA was further extracted following the differential lysis protocol. The recovered DNA was quantified by means of real time PCR and the average DNA yield was used to compare results. Direct extractions of equivalent aliquots of each semen dilution were used as reference samples. Even though a high percentage of the starting material was lost during the process of transfer to/recover from the solid support, our experimental results demonstrated that the DNA IQ system was able to detect around 10³ sperm cells in the starting material, enabling to obtain a complete DNA profile with AmpFl STR IdentiFiler PCR Amplification Kit (Applied Biosystems).     

Optimisation of cellular DNA recovery from tape-lifts

Adhesive tape-lifts are a commonly used technique for the recovery of DNA from forensic exhibits. Examination of large forensic exhibits or tape-lifts from old “cold” cases can make the direct submission of the tapes for extraction difficult. By applying a swab loaded with an organic solvent to the tape-lift, any DNA bound to the tape can be transferred and concentrated on to the swab head. Whilst removing any DNA, the tape's glue adhesive is also transferred. This requires a modified extraction technique that can dissolve the adhesive whilst maintaining the integrity of any DNA. Of several solvents tested, xylene was shown to be the solvent of choice, efficiently removing the adhesive and any bound DNA. A modified chelex extraction method, again incorporating xylene, provided optimal conditions for dissolving the adhesive and releasing the DNA for lysis.     

手部脱落细胞DNA转移及二次转移的实验研究

目的研究脱落细胞遗留者洗手时间及所接触客体类型对手部脱落细胞转移的影响,同时考察手部脱落细胞DNA是否能够发生二次转移。方法 9名志愿者在洗手后30min、2h、6h分别握持木柄螺丝刀、橡胶柄螺丝刀、胶木插头1min和佩戴粗纱手套15min,对上述物品进行DNA提取检测,同时进行手部脱落细胞的二次转移实验。结果从志愿者接触过的物品中能够获得的STR基因座数量随着接触者洗手后时间的延长而增加;在洗手后30min和2h的触摸实验中,4种客体检出的基因座数量存在统计学差异,从手套中检出的基因座数量多于从木柄和橡胶柄螺丝刀中检出的数量;从脱落细胞遗留状态较差者握持过的螺丝刀中,检出了与该物品没有直接接触的脱落细胞遗留状态较好者部分STR基因座。结论接触者最后一次洗手时间是影响脱落细胞DNA转移的一个重要因素,在接触性DNA的提取检测和结果解释过程中,对有可能发生的二次转移现象应予以高度注意。     

Optimization of DNA recovery from toothbrushes

In human identification, the victim's toothbrush is an invaluable personal item as the deposited cellular material contains DNA from which a reference profile can be produced. The profile obtained then allows direct comparison to be made with the profile from the unidentified body. This study was undertaken to determine the minimum number of bristle bundles that would generate a complete DNA profile. The minimum period of usage for a toothbrush to retain enough cells for genotyping was also investigated. We also tested two commonly used DNA extraction methods: QIAamp^® DNA Mini Kit and Chelex^® 100 to explore the efficiency of these protocols in recovering DNA from toothbrushes. In this experiment, volunteers brushed their teeth for 1, 7, 14, or 30 days. DNA was extracted from 5 and 10 bundles of bristles cut from the collected toothbrushes. The amount of DNA recovered was quantified by quantitative real-time PCR, and DNA genotyping was performed for each sample. Data revealed that QIAamp^® DNA Mini Kit performed better at yielding DNA in terms of purity, quantity, and quality than Chelex^® 100. It was also found that, with a suitable method of recovery, DNA samples from five bundles of bristles from all of the toothbrushes generated complete profiles. Based on the experimental results, a general guideline concerning the appropriate extraction method and the quantity of the starting material for the analysis of DNA from toothbrushes could be suggested.     

车辆内接触DNA检测方法的分析比较

目的探讨汽车内接触DNA的分离方法及遗传标记分型效率。方法收集单人长期驾驶的11辆小型轿车,采用粘取法和擦拭法富集方向盘、变速杆和手刹三个部位的脱落细胞,采用磁珠法和硅胶膜法提取基因组DNA,采用GoldenEye^TM 20A和PowerPlex■Fusion进行扩增,并对检验结果进行比较分析。结果方向盘在基因座分型正确率、等位基因drop-in和drop-out基因座比率、单基因座正确率以及单基因座等位基因drop-in和drop-out率六个方面均表现最好,其次为变速杆,最差为手刹;擦拭法和粘取法之间DNA提取在获得的DNA总量和STR检测正确成功率方面无统计学差异;PPFusion与20A的总体基因座分型比较正确率无差异,但单基因座正确率优于20A,drop-out发生率低于20A,drop-in发生率高于20A。结论汽车内脱落细胞的检测可优先采集方向盘部位,根据载体质地选择擦拭法或粘取法采集脱落细胞,选用硅胶膜法或磁珠法提取DNA,PPFusion和20A两个试剂盒均可,分析结果时需特别注意drop-in和drop-out。