检察官誓词的哲学思考

我是中华人民共和国检察官,我宣誓:忠于国家、忠于人民、忠于宪法和法律,忠实履行法律监督职责,恪守检察职业道德,维护公平正义,维护法制统一。——检察官誓词     

检察官“文明”的职业内涵及践行

文明是检察官应当遵循的职业道德准则,也是检察官应当展示的良好执法形象。检察官文明的职业内涵包括检察理念文明、检察行为文明、检察作风文明、检察语言文明等内容。践行＂文明＂,检察官要增强法律监督能力,遵守礼仪规范,培养高尚的道德操守,树立良好社会形象,营造健康、有序、和谐的工作环境,维护检察形象等。     

检察官职业道德的地位、功能与意义

检察官职业道德是中国特色社会主义检察制度的重要内容,是检察官职业群体的精神支柱．检察官职业道德建设在检察机关队伍建设中具有基础性、根本性和保障性。加强检察官职业道德建设对于检察官切实履行好法律监督职责,维护公平正义,树立检察职业形象,增强执法公信力等具有重大的意义。     

法治进程中检察官专业化之必要性

中国检察制度是社会主义法治进程中的一项重要制度,是检察官专业化的基础。检察官担负着法律监督职责,履行法律监督职能,推进检察官专业化,既是检察官履行职责的要求,也是提高检察官素质和依法治国的要求。     

检察制度本源刍探

一、检察的概念及性质对于检察的概念和性质 ,人们大体上总是因法律文化传统、社会类型的差异或感情的好恶 ,而形成不同的理解。按照法律文化传统的区别划分 ,大陆法系国家把检察看作国家维护公益的制度及其行为。具体来说 ,作为大陆法系的典型国家的法国 ,认为检察官是共和国的利益的代表官员 ,① 检察即是检察官代表国家利益行使职权的行为。英美法系国家与大陆法系国家不同。以英国为例 ,由于英国在中世纪长期推行黑暗野蛮的控审合一的刑事诉讼审判制度 ,为改变追诉和审判统归于领主或国王的状况 ,使被控者受审得到公平的保证 ,② 从亨利…     

职业准入制度：检察官专业化实现之路径

由于检察官准入制度存在不足，特别是目前检察官的专业素质总体不高，影响了检察机关的法律监督职能的充分发挥。根据检察工作规律和检察官职业特点，借鉴德国、日本等国家的检察官准入制度，构建一个符合我国国情的有中国特色的检察官职业准入制度，提高检察队伍的专业素质，保证法律监督职能的正确履行。     

检察官专业化问题研究

检察官专业化建设是司法改革的重要内容。检察实践中，由于检察官专业化建设方面存在诸多问题制约了检察权的依法独立公正行使。必须通过严格检察官的职业准入和职业标准、加强检察官职业培训、实行检察人员分类管理、健全检察官绩效考核评价体系、深化检察改革等措施，加强检察官专业化建设，提高检察官履行检察职责的专业能力，充分发挥检察官在建设社会主义法治国家中的作用。     

“79”检察体制的困境与再生

本文主要论述"79"检察体制存在的问题,根本原因所在以及解决问题的思路。提出首先应调整分工,重塑公检两机关的关系。其次应改革检察官管理体制,提高检察官素质,明确检察官的独立的法律地位。第三应建立中央和省两极检察体制,合理划分中央和地方的检察权,取消垂直领导。第四方面问题就是要打破职业法律官僚对公诉权的垄断,建立开放、流动的检察官管理体制。     

试论检察官职业道德长效机制的建设

检察官职业道德,是检察官在长期的检察实践活动中形成的比较稳定的道德观念、行为、规范和品质的总和,是一定社会对检察官职业行为提出的基本道德要求,是检察官思想觉悟、道德品质和精神面貌的集中体现。检察官职业道德的形成,既是检察官捍卫公平正义、维护法律统一这一核心职责的内在要求,     

《2004-2008年全国检察人才队伍建设规划》关键词

检察人才分类管理改革检察人才分类管理改革,是指按照检察机关的职能需要和各类人员的岗位特点,将检察人员分为检察官、检察事务官(检察官助理)和检察行政人员。依据工作职能、职责权限,合理设置和划分各类人员职位和职务层次,对检察人员实行规范化管理。检察官,是指依法行使国家检察权的检察人员,是履行国家法律监督职能的主体。要重点培养一批精通本部门业务、熟悉相关专业知识、能独立承担重大专项任务的高素质检察官队伍。检察事务官(检察官助理),是指在检察活动中从事辅助性、事务性、技术性工作的检察人员,要努力建设一支思想政治素质…     

Free movement of law students and lawyers in the EU: a comparison of English,German and Greek legislation

This article focuses on the linked themes of mobility within the European Union for law students and for lawyers. It highlights obstacles to cross-border legal education and legal practice across three Member States: England and Wales, Germany, and Greece. The European legal framework is outlined. The implications of recent case law of the European Court of Justice, on the conditions of access to higher education and financial support, are considered. Three main areas of concern are identified: admission arrangements; student finance; and the professional recognition of qualifications. The article compares the approach of the three Member States in each of these areas and explores conflicts between their domestic law provisions and European Union law. The article concludes by identifying ways in which ‘Europeanisation’ of legal education and the legal profession could be encouraged by facilitating law student mobility and by modernising the law curriculum.     

关于建立我国司法考试及训练制度的构想

大多数有良好法治秩序的国家都是通过国家司法考试培养和选拔所需职业法律家的。我国《法官法》、《检察官法》修正案虽然已将国家司法考试写入立法 ,但司法考试的具体内容还缺乏法律的明确规定。国家司法考试应包括法官、检察官、律师三种职业资格 ;报考者应有坚定的信念、大学教育背景和良好品行 ;考试程式及内容设计应能全面检测报考者的文化素养、法律专业知识和从业能力。     

Forensic Engineering Critique of Mold Expert Opinions

Selecting a technical professional can be difficult. Using the court's guidelines can serve as a useful template for gauging qualifications. Since 1993 (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals 1993), the standard for admitting expert testimony has become increasingly more rigorous, as it has become better defined by subsequent case law and amended state statutes. This may contribute to increased dependence on expert reports to clarify issues, and serve as aids to negotiated settlements. Two examples are discussed where experts did not meet the criteria in this template.     

从国际实践看国家需要具备的条件

国家需要具备的条件用于区分国家与其他政治实体。从国际实践看,人民、与别的国家进行交往的能力或者进行国际交往的能力、有效的政府、遵守国际法方面的要求、国家的作用、民主和尊重人权方面的要求等国际法学者提出的国家需要具备的条件或者国家资格的标准不是国家需要具备的条件。国家需要具备的条件是定居的居民、领土、政府和独立。     

Teaching medical ethics and law

The teaching of medical ethics is not yet characterised by recognised, standard requirements for formal qualifications, training and experience; this is not surprising as the field is still relatively young and maturing. Under the broad issue of the requirements for teaching medical ethics are numerous more specific questions, one of which concerns whether medical ethics can be taught in isolation from considerations of the law, and vice versa. Ethics and law are cognate, though distinguishable, disciplines. In a practical, professional enterprise such as medicine, they cannot and should not be taught as separate subjects. One way of introducing students to the links and tensions between medical ethics and law is to consider the history of law via its natural and positive traditions. This encourages understanding of how medical practice is placed within the contexts of ethics and law in the pluralist societies in which most students will practise. Four examples of topics from medical ethics teaching are described to support this claim. Australasian medical ethics teachers have paid less attention to the role of law in their curricula than their United Kingdom counterparts. Questions like the one addressed here will help inform future deliberations concerning minimal requirements for teaching medical ethics.     

论我国资格刑的立法缺失、补足和完善

资格刑并不是一个法定的附加刑,而是刑法理论上对剥夺犯罪人一定资格刑罚的统称和概括。随着社会的发展,资格刑在刑法体系中将发挥越来越重要的作用。但目前,我国刑法关于资格刑的规定还有许多不合理之处,也存在着一定的立法缺失。因此,需要立法完善和补足。     

警察专业发展:内涵、路径与保障

警察职业是一种专业,警察是履行执法职责的专业人员,其执法水平的提高有赖于他们的专业发展。警察系统不仅应建立包括职前高等学历教育、入职训练、在职提高一体化的、贯穿整个职业生涯的警察专业发展制度,而且,还应制定相应的专业标准和职业资格制度,促进和保障警察专业持续发展,专业地位不断提高。     

我国法官的重组与分流研究

法官职业化和精英化是法治对现代司法体制的必然要求。我国现有法官人数过多,素质不高,不能满足这一条件。因此,应在重新界定我国四级法院性质和功能的基础上,按照现代审级制度的要求确定各级法院的法官员额和任职资格,并对现任法官进行重组与分流,以优化法院人员结构,构建法官少、辅助人员多的新型法院。     

刍议人民监督员制度的完善

人民监督员的任务是监督监督者的司法活动,工作的性质是“民督宫”,由此决定了人民监督员应具备较高道德、业务素质,并能够代表社会各阶层的利益。他们应当来自于企事业单位和社会团体。国家机关工作人员、人大代表皆不宜兼任人民监督员职务。现试行的人民监督员制度,对人民监督员的选聘条件规定过于粗糙,选聘程序在实际操作中缺乏透明度,监督员的责任也未明确,难以保障监督的实效,故该制度应在许多方面予以完善。     

Law and Coercion: Some Clarification

The relationship between law and coercion has been, and still is, a central topic in legal philosophy. Despite this, discussion about it is immersed in confusion. Some philosophers have noticed this, but hardly any work has been done to attempt to solve or even identify the confusions. This paper aims to fill this gap. Here I propose distinctions and qualifications that help us clarify the relationship between law and coercion and avoid confusion. Building on the clarificatory work, I then argue that despite there being several distinct philosophical discussions about the relationship between law and coercion, one of them should be prioritised.