非法雇工的工伤待遇

1.哪些工伤人员可以被列为非法用工单位伤亡人员?答:《非法用工单位伤亡人员一次性赔偿办法》规定,非法用工单位伤亡人员是指在无营业执照或者未经依法登记、备案的单位以及被依法吊销营业执照或者撤销登记、备案的单位受到事故伤害或者患职业病的职工,或者用人单位使用童工造成的伤残、死亡童工。2.非法用工单位伤亡人员的工伤待遇怎么落实?答:由非法用工单位按照《非法用工单位伤亡人员一次性赔偿办法》的规定向伤残职工或死亡职工的直系亲属、伤残童工或者死亡童工的直系亲属给予一次性赔偿。3.如何确定非法用工单位伤亡人员一次性赔偿的…     

工伤案件赔偿请求权竞合问题研究

工伤案件往往同时涉及工伤保险待遇和人身损害赔偿两种不同的请求权,在这两种请求权竞合时如何处理,我国现有法律显得很不完善.通过对工伤保险待遇和人身损害赔偿两种不同的请求权进行比较,分析我国现有法律规范关于工伤案件赔偿请求权竞合时如何处理的相关规定及其存在的问题,介绍国外处理工伤案件赔偿请求权竞合问题的四种不同模式,提出解决工伤案件赔偿请求权竞合问题的建议.     

工伤待遇和交通事故人身损害赔偿竞合时的处理

【裁判要旨】单位职工在执行单位任务过程中发生交通事故造成人身损害,经认定属于工伤,单位按照劳动和社会保障部门的工伤保险方面的规定支付职工受伤住院的医药费及一次性伤残补偿金后,职工能否因交通事故造成人身损害另行起诉,要求单位赔偿误工费、伙食补助费、护理费、伤残补助费等费用?本案的裁判旨在明确职工因交通事故发生工伤,工伤待遇和交通事故人身损害赔偿竞合时可以采取双重赔偿的处理办法。     

职工与用人单位在工伤保险方面的争议如何解决?

答:《工伤保险条例》第五十二条规定,职工与用人单位之间发生的工伤保险争议,属于劳动争议的范畴,应当根据劳动争议处理的有关规定解决。《工伤保险条例》确定的工伤补偿制度的模式是工伤社会保险加单位责任制,工伤职工的一些待遇是由其所在单位承担的,例如,工伤职工需要住院治疗,应由所在单位按照本单位因公出差伙食补助标     

从业人员因安全生产事故受伤可同时获得工伤与侵权赔偿

从业人员因安全生产事故依法获得工伤保险待遇后,仍可依据安全生产法第五十六条规定向生产经营单位主张侵权损害赔偿,从而保障受害人及其近亲属能够获得充分的救济。但该民事赔偿应当属于对工伤保险待遇项目和赔偿金额的补足,而非获得双重赔偿。     

船员工伤救济法律问题研究

由于船员工作的特殊性和风险性,现行法并不足以为船员工伤提供应有的救济。船员法应基于救济的及时性和充分性,明确船员工作的性质及船员工伤的认定标准、船员工伤保险赔偿请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权的关系、保赔保险赔款的归属、劳务派遣时船员工伤的救济权,确立可行的程序性权利,并从海事行政监管的角度来保障船员工伤救济权益。     

未参保单位职工职业伤害法律问题研究

我国现行《工伤保险条例》将参加工伤保险和未参加工伤保险的工伤问题进行统一规定,但未明确规定未参加工伤保险的单位职工职业伤害的事实如何确定,责任怎样承担。未参保单位职工职业伤害符合工伤事故构成要件,应属于工伤,工伤事故作为法律事实,应当由劳动争议仲裁机构或人民法院认定。基于工伤的社会风险属性,未参保单位职工职业伤害应当实行法定的工伤待遇,而不能要求民事侵权赔偿。现行《工伤保险条例》应当在主体、劳动争议仲裁与裁后民事诉讼的关系、加大保护力度、实现制度创新等方面进一步完善。     

对工伤救济程序的反思

工业社会日新月异的发展,伴随着工伤事故频繁发生,由此也导致由职业伤害所引发的工伤行政确认、工伤待遇给付、工伤损害赔偿案件逐年增加。笔者所在中级法院2007至2009年共审结一、二审行政案件296件,其中工伤行政确认案件52件,占17.6%,跃居行政诉讼收案数量第三位。现行工伤救济程序的设计与之不相适应,阻碍了权利人及时获得赔偿,程序中行民分治的格局时常引发裁判冲突,使司法权威、诉讼效益和程序正义面临严峻考验。一、提出问题:程序设计僵化与兼容性缺乏繁琐复杂的程序设计已成为受害人及时获得赔偿的枷锁。工伤保险条例规定,工伤赔付程序要经历劳动关系认定、工伤行政确认、劳动能力鉴定、工伤待遇行政给付或工伤赔偿四个程序。据报道:全国最长的工伤     

工伤包括哪些内容

来信我是某国有企业的一名司机 ,不久前 ,因运输原材料发生车祸 ,我左腿粉碎性骨折致残。请问 ,我在工作中发生伤残事故属于工伤吗 ?工伤包括哪些内容 ?江西　李某复信可以肯定地告诉你 ,你在工作中发生伤残事故 ,属于工伤 ,依法享受工伤保险待遇。根据我国《企业职工工伤保险试行办法》第 8条规定 ,职工由于下列情形之一负伤、致残、死亡 ,应当认定为工伤 :( 1 )从事本单位日常生产、工作或者单位负责人临时指定的工作的 ,在紧急情况下 ,虽未经本单位负责人指定但从事直接关系本单位重大利益的工作的 ;( 2 )经本单位负责人安排或者同意 ,从…     

工伤认定行政案件存在的若干问题

由于目前对工伤认定问题仅有国务院颁布的《工伤保险条例》作为依据,而其规定较为原则、抽象,缺乏一定的操作性,不能适应日益复杂的工伤认定司法审查的需要,对劳动保障行政部门处理工伤事故和法院审理工伤案件造成了混乱和不协调,也一定程度上阻却了伤亡职工的权利救济。为最大限     

单位犯罪主体之质疑

《刑法》虽然规定了单位可以成为犯罪主体,但是,单位成为犯罪主体存在着一系列的理论与实际问题,可能导致宪政上的困境。单位成为犯罪主体并不能有效地达到预防犯罪的刑罚目的,应该取消单位作为犯罪主体的规定。     

Advance directives as an instrument in an ageing Europe

Advance directives are written or oral statements that are intended to govern healthcare decision-making for their authors, for both positive and negative decisions, should they lose decisional capacity in the future. In a Europe which is facing an ageing population, advance directives play an increasing role to (help) formulate the wishes from elderly patient once they start losing the capacity to decide independently. Advance directives should not only be used as a formulation of the patients' previously made decision, but can also be used as guidelines to better understand the previous expressed wishes of the patient. If the advance directive is formulated in too vague form, the healthcare proxy and/or the healthcare trustee can help the physician interpret the directive. This broader approach towards advance directives is reflected in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as on the European legislative level.     

Becoming an Informant

Though widely acknowledged as vital to law enforcement, social scientists have largely ignored the practice of confidential informing. The extant literature on the topic is primarily comprised of experientially based practical guides to informant management and a handful of field studies drawing information from informants in the study of other undercover practices. This study features data obtained from in‐depth interviews with eighty‐four former informants drawn from five southern states identified through a purposive‐snowball sampling strategy. Informant accounts suggest that the practice of confidential informing is an institutionalized component of a general narcotics enforcement pattern characterized by duplicity and social control irony. Confidential informant work is observed as a moral career entailing deviant identity maintenance through neutralizations and insider perspective. Narratives confirmed a motivational typology accounting for role assumption and informant–agent dynamics and orient discussion around practice and research implications.     

Interaction and basic rights in an international perspective: an introduction

The effective enjoyment of basic rights largely depends on communicative processes and other forms of social interaction. Traditional conceptions of basic rights do not explicitly address this relevance of social interaction, though. Legal conceptions of basic rights rather focus on the right to a particular discretionary, but isolated and individual behaviour. This article points out the different established dimensions of basic rights protection and points out the relevance of social interaction for the enjoyment of basic rights as well as the legal consequences in different jurisdictions.

     

Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm--unusual complication of an electric shock.

Here we report about a 35-year-old electrical engineer who was found dead in his study. Postmortem examination revealed that death resulted because of subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage caused by the rupture of an intracranial aneurysm. Right hand and left cheek revealed electrical marks with metallizations on skin, an electric shock was diagnosed to have preceded death. The close temporal correlation suggests that a sudden rise in blood pressure was caused by the electric current and was thus responsible for the rupture of the aneurysm.