共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 592 毫秒
1.
2.
张康之 《北京行政学院学报》2008,(1):26-31
胡锦涛在十七大报告中对社会主义民主的建设和发展作出了系统的论述,它是改革开放以来的中国"走自己的路"的结果.社会主义民主与西方民主不同,它是实质民主而不是形式民主,是构建社会主义和谐社会的保障和政治基础.西方民主是人类历史发展的一个特定阶段的产物,而社会主义民主是在人类向后工业社会转型过程中面对新的问题而发展出来的一种新的民主类型. 相似文献
3.
民主作为人类自由权利在政治领域的体现,作为一种普世价值,既没有资本主义民主、社会主义民主之分,其本身也没有阶级性可言。但是,就它的发展进程和实践来看,有史以来的民主都是有产者的民主。这就使它蒙上了一层阶级色彩。所谓资产阶级民主和无产阶级民主、资本主义民主和社会 相似文献
4.
5.
中国先有协商民主,后有选举民主,全国人大召开后,人民政协继续存在,人大选举民主与政协协商民主长期共存、相辅相成、协同发展,从而构成了独具中国特色、中国风格、中国气派的社会主义民主形式。人大选举民主与政协协商民主的协同发展,既能发挥各自优势,又能弥补各自不足。推进人大选举民主与政协协商民主协同发展,能够实现刚性民主与柔性民主的相得益彰,能够实现人民群众根本利益同部分群众特殊利益的完美结合,能够确保人民既有充分投票的权利又有广泛参与的权利,从而真正实现人民民主。 相似文献
6.
7.
加强宪政视野下农村民主管理制度概念的分析,具有重要的理论价值与实践意义。在对农村民主管理制度的实施运行进行经验性和规律性概括的基础上,我们发现农村民主管理制度是一个多层次、多向度、多维度的综合性概念,其具有基层民主自治理念性的属性,自由、民主、平等及权利等是其主要的理念要素,这几个理念要素之间是互相联系、互相影响,互相渗透的,自由与平等是权利理念的根据和基础,民主理念是权利理念的保证,权利理念是自由、民主、平等理念在农村基层民主自治理念领域中的具体化。 相似文献
8.
9.
大力构建党建科学化整体布局,是十七届四中全会的核心要义.党建科学化问题涉及到党的建设的价值与目标、组织与设计、政党内部管理、政党形象塑造与社会认同等多个方面.究其实质,就是党的建设理论和布局要符合不断发展变化的客观实际.要实现党的建设科学化,首要的是实现党内民主建设科学化,党内民主科学化的基础则是党内基层、民主科学化.所谓党内基层民主科学化,其核心就是规范基层党组织的权力,把属于党员的权利重新归还给党员.以党内基层民主建设为基础,以保障党员的知情权、参与权、选举权、监督权、表达权为重点,积极探索新时期党内基层民主建设的多种实现形式,成为了当前党内基层民主建设的指导方针和路径选择. 相似文献
10.
田玉才 《云南行政学院学报》2008,10(2):73-76
和谐是民主的必然趋势,民主是和谐的本质要求.人类社会之所以尚未实现和谐,是因为人类还远未实现民主、或充分圆满的民主之故,只有民主,才能使人类社会渐进和谐之境.和平发展与平衡发展是中国民主发展必然遵循的道路,也是社会和谐的必经之途.中国的民主应是多阶级融合融洽、和谐相处的民主. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
Timothy Mitchell 《Economy and Society》2013,42(3):399-432
Abstract States that depend upon oil revenues appear to be less democratic than other states. Yet oil presents a much larger problem for democracy: faced with the threats of oil depletion and catastrophic climate change, the democratic machineries that emerged to govern the age of carbon energy seem to be unable to address the processes that may end it. This article explores these multiple dimensions of carbon democracy, by examining the intersecting histories of coal, oil and democracy in the twentieth century. Following closely the methods by which fossil fuels were produced, distributed and converted into other forms of socio-technical organization, financial circulation and political power, the article traces ways in which the concentration and control of energy flows could open up democratic possibilities or close them down; how connections were engineered in the post-war period between the flow of oil and the flows of international finance, on which democratic stability was thought to depend; how these same circulations made possible the emergence of the economy and its unlimited growth as the main object of democratic politics; and how the relations among forms of energy, finance, economic knowledge, democracy and violence were transformed in the 1967–74 oil–dollar Middle East crises. 相似文献
15.
Arend Lijphart 《European Journal of Political Research》2002,41(1):107-113
Abstract. In spite of a large number of disagreements concerning methodological and classificatory questions between Klaus Armingeon and myself, our substantive conclusions are very similar. Armingeon concludes that all three aspects of his negotiation democracy (consociationalism, corporatism, and counter-majoritarian institutions) result in superior government performance in selected areas – a finding that I interpret as supportive of my similar claims for the executives-parties dimension of consensus democracy (which consists of consociationalism plus corporatism) as well as for the federal-unitary dimension (which is the same as Armingeon's counter-majoritarian institutions). We are therefore also in broad agreement on the advice we can give to democratic constitutional engineers. 相似文献
16.
FRANK BEALEY 《European Journal of Political Research》1993,23(2):203-223
Abstract. This article attempts to examine the supposed causal connection between capitalism and democracy as assumed by Schumpeter, among others. An intellectual link might be traceable to the Utilitarians; but no causal connection between corporate capitalism and democracy emerges. In general they are separate concepts. Any indirect association arises from their 'liberal' roots. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
乔贵平 《云南行政学院学报》2008,10(1):4-8
民主是社会主义的价值取向之一.本文按照社会主义历史发展的线索,把20世纪社会主义内部关于民主问题的分歧和争论归纳为三个核心问题,即无产阶级专政与民主的关系是什么?如何看待资本主义民主与社会主义民主的关系?民主与社会主义的关系是什么? 相似文献
20.