后现代语境中的生态消费

在后现代语境下,生态消费的基础在于理论前提的多元化,核心在于主体与客体范围的扩展,表征在于发生逻辑的立体交织,而条件则在于影响方式的辐射化与收敛化的抗争。     

经济法的法价值范畴研究

本文全面而深刻地论证了经济法的法律价值 ,认为经济法的法权价值在于对权力的规制 ,资源价值在于追求发展公平 ,而社会价值则在于维护经济安全     

国企产权制度改革的法学思路

国企产权制度改革的出路不在于通过改制"国退民进",也不在于国有资产私有化。惟一的出路在于以平等独立的物权理念,建立统一、独立的财产利用制度,并通过立法对国有企业经营权作出明确而具体的规定。     

关于思想的理解

人与动物的最根本的区别在于人有理性,人与人之间区别也不仅仅在于他们之间外表上的差异,而在于思想上的不同维度。本文分为两个部分,从哲学和语言两个角度对思想进行了简要的分析。     

宪法学理论体系的反思与重构

宪法学的基本矛盾是公民权利与国家权力的关系。其道德基础在于人权保障 ,社会基础在于国家与社会的二元化 ,逻辑起点在于人民主权。完整的宪法学理论体系应以解决这个基本矛盾为主线 ,包括宪法基础、公民权利、国家权力和宪政运行四个方面的内容。     

论刑事诉讼法修改对检察理念之诉求

哈佛校训称,一个人的成长不在于经验和知识,更重要的在于他是否有先进的理念和思维方式。同样,一个理念的恒久不在于当下,而在于其是否保持不断充实和革新的劲头和冲力。检察理念即是如此。伴随着新刑事诉讼法的修改和实施,检察理念的内容一直在充实和革新,特别是在公正理念、监督理念和理性理念方面,新刑事诉讼法对检察理念有了更高诉求。     

让监事会不再是纸老虎

我国公司内部的监督不力，不在于监督机关设置的错误，而在于我们没严格依照专门监管机构的理念去界定其具体制度     

浅析中国食品监管的得失与破局

就制度而言,我国目前食品安全监管体制基本符合国情,解决食品安全问题,其重中之重不在于创新制度,而在于改革人事。     

许霆案:司法独立下裁判的法律效果与社会效果

许霆案的意义在于法治社会法官在裁判中如何做到裁判既要达到比较满意的法律效果又要达到比较满意的社会效果。司法独立与公开审判是法治国家最重要的品质体现。司法独立的重要意义在于获得裁判的法律效果,而裁判的规范性讲的便是法律效果;公开审判的重要的意义在于正义不应当只是被实行的,也应当是被看见要实行的。判决理由的公开在于实现判裁的安定性和可预见性,而裁判的安定性和可预见性讲得便是社会效果。     

刑事缺席审判制度的价值分析

我国加入<联合国反腐败公约>以后,建立刑事缺席审判制度既具有很强的现实意义,又具有深厚的价值底蕴.其哲学基础在于矛盾的特殊性,法理学根据在于矫正正义,诉讼法学根基为有罪必诉、有诉必审,刑法学价值在于一般预防,经济学价值则为诉讼效率.     

The Podmore case

On January 10, 1929, in Southampton, England, two men examining the interior of a long-padlocked garage that had been previously used as a storeroom by a local agent of the Wolf's Head Oil Company found the decomposing body of its missing agent, Vivian Messiter. The assistance of Scotland Yard was obtained. Sir Bernard Spilsbury's autopsy revealed that Messiter had died from several severe blunt force craniocerebral injuries, the murder weapon apparently being a blood-encrusted hammer found nearby. Suspicion immediately centered on William Podmore, alias William Thomas, who had been employed by Messiter for 3 days in late October 1928, immediately prior to Messiter's being declared missing. Podmore, who was wanted for fraud and robbery elsewhere in England, was questioned and told a self-serving story. Meanwhile, it had been suspected that he had reported to Messiter sales of oil to fictitious customers, collecting commissions on same, and this was eventually reinforced by the finding of traces of writing in a receipt book. Two fellow prisoners of Podmore stated that he had confessed in their presence. Almost 14 months after the murder, Podmore was charged with it. He was later convicted, and was hanged after some public outcry against the verdict.     

The political-criminal nexus in the united states

Summary The 1967 Task Force Report on Organized Crime (TFR) found that “...all available data indicate that organized crime flourishes only where it has corrupted public officials.” 48 From that standpoint, neutralizing local law enforcement would appear to be central to criminal operations. That conclusion would depend on (a) how one defines “organized crime” and (b) the assumption that organized crime described by the Task Force covers all cases and species of it including what is referred to as “non-traditional” organized crime. A conclusion that seems unchallengeable in the Report is the observation that it was impossible to determine “the extent of the corruption of public officials in the United States.” The lack of information on this question was aggravated by the fact that many of those who provided information to the Task Force were themselves public officials.     

The Organisation of Hate

In this paper, it is argued that we need to understand the role of ‘hate’ in the organisation of bodies and spaces before we ask the question of the limits of ‘hate crime’ as a legal category. Rather than assuming hate is a psychological disposition - that it comes from within a psyche and then moves out to others - the paper suggests that hate works to align individual and collective bodies through the very intensity of its attachments. Such alignments are unstable precisely given the fact that hate does not reside in a subject, object or body; the instability of hate is what makes it so powerful in generating the effects that it does. Furthermore, although hate does not reside positively in a subject, body or sign, this does not mean that hate does have effects that are structural and mediated. This paper shows that hate becomes attached or ‘stuck’ to particular bodies, often through violence, force and harm. The paper dramatizes its arguments by a reflection on racism as hate crime, looking at the circulation of figures of hate in discourses of nationhood, from both extreme right wing and mainstream political parties. It also considers the part of what hate is doing can precisely be understood in terms of the affect it has on the bodies of those designated as the hated, an affective life that is crucial to the injustice of hate crime. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The Limits of the Harm Principle

The harm principle, understood as the normative requirement that conduct should be criminalized only if it is harmful, has difficulty in dealing with those core cases of criminal wrongdoing that can occur without causing any direct harm. Advocates of the harm principle typically find it implausible to hold that these core cases should not be crimes and so usually seek out some indirect harm that can justify criminalizing the seemingly harmless conduct. But this strategy justifies criminalization of a wide range of conduct on the basis of the fear, worry, and anxiety it generates among those who are not the direct victims of the conduct, and thereby undermines the limiting role of the harm principle by permitting the very move it was meant to prevent: the criminalization of harmless conduct on the ground of others’ feelings about it. The best way to avoid this dilemma is to recognize that people have rights, operating independently of the harm principle, to be treated in certain ways just because they are persons. The existence of such rights provides a ground for both criminalizing conduct and limiting the scope of criminalization because these rights point both to conduct that people must be permitted to engage in (regardless of its harmful effects) and conduct that might well be criminalized (though it is not harmful). A complete account of criminal law will therefore require the harm principle to work together with an independent account of rights.     

《反垄断法》与社会主义市场经济

一、反垄断法是现代市场经济的守护神 反垄断法是高级的市场经济之法,<中华人民共和国反垄断法>的出台,标志着社会主义市场经济及其法治在我国进入了一个新的发展阶段.它让每一个关心国家发展、民族复兴大业的人长长地舒了一口气.     

The Totemic Authority of the Court

This article examines the place of the court within civil religion. It is argued that every civil religion is rooted in a magical anchor that in contemporary democratic civil religions is provided by the court. While in most institutions of civil religion totemic authority is represented, in court it is present. Therefore, court proceedings are occurrences of magic: they are performances (rituals and ceremonies) during which the sacred Thing is present. In court, the law itself and the clerical community to which it was entrusted assume the characteristics of the sacred Thing. The law appears under two facets: on the one hand, it is a norm and a word while, on the other hand, it is a Thing devoid of meaning and reason. Formalism is a magical mode of thinking that treats law as a timeless and meaningless Thing. In the course of the argument, the distinctions between ceremony and ritual, between social structure and communitas, and between religion and magic are reformulated, and the concepts of zone of familiarity and clerical community are laid out in a nutshell. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The right to be forgotten: The Israeli version

The right to be forgotten and erase, originally introduced in the well-known case of Google Spain, has caused considerable legal debates on both theoretical and procedural issues. The Israeli Supreme Court has also just recently considered the issue when it was asked to enforce the right to be forgotten of an Israeli advocate, Jonathan Miller, and delist harmful information which appeared in a Google search, and was in truth related to a different adv. Jonathan Miller. The plaintiff relied on the Israeli Prohibition of Defamation Law. Liability was denied on the basis that the information was indeed true, and thus- justified. We suggest in this article that the court should have imposed liability in negligence, an open ended general tort that mainly applies when particular torts fail to supply a reasonable and just solution in new factual situations due to change in social, economic and technological circumstances.     

The effect of heating on Y-chromosome detection

The effect of heating on Y-chromosome detection was investigated. Heat-treated blood was divided into four groups according to the hemolysis pattern obtained by the coil planet centrifuge system. A significant difference between the Y-positive nuclei of males and females was observed up to group III of the hemolysis pattern, and it was possible to determine the sex of the blood donor in spite of karyolysis and degeneration of blood components. However, sex determination of blood in group IV, indicating complete hemolysis, was impossible because of overlapping between male and female Y-chromosome counts. Practical application of this sex determination method was successful even with severly burned cadavers. However, it was suggested that putrefaction together with heat damage made the identification nearly impossible.     

反垄断法对产业政策的拾遗补缺作用

中国<反垄断法>第7条规定:"国有经济占控制地位的关系国民经济命脉和国家安全的行业以及实行专营的行业,国家对其经营者的合法经营活动予以保护,并对经营者的经营行为及其商品和服务的价格依法实施监管和调控,维护消费者利益,促进技术进步.""前款规定行业的经营者应当依法经营,诚实守信,严格自律,接受社会公众的监督,不得利用其控制地位或者专营地位损害消费者利益."第7条所说的行业,也就是我们通常所说的管制行业,如通讯、铁路、石油,等等.对这些行业的管制又代表了我国对这些行业的产业政策.从这一角度上,行业管制与产业政策只是一个问题的不同称谓而已,侧重点不同,但实质一样.因此,<反垄断法>第7条提供了处理产业政策与反垄断法关系的原则.     

新民主主义宪政立法的有益尝试——1946年《哈尔滨市施政纲领》考察

1946年《哈尔滨市施政纲领》是中国共产党在新民主主义革命阶段为建立国家政权积累经验,在中心大城市实行民主政治、建设管理政权的初次尝试,是对毛泽东提出的新民主主义理论的最早实践。该纲领中提出的“建立民主的、法治的社会秩序”及“建设和平、民主、独立、繁荣的新哈尔滨”的构想,对其后相继建立的各解放区的宪政立法及《中国人民政治协商会议共同纲领》产生了直接影响,是新中国宪政立法的重要渊源。