警察职权的配置与警察权益的保护

我国现行法律赋予了警察机关以广泛、重大的职权,但立法上对警察机关行政职权制衡机制配置上的不完善,对警察行政强制权特别是即时强制权配置上的失衡,导致警察执法过程中种种滥用警察权和警察权益受损情形同时存在.因而,从立法上加强对警察权的限制、制约与规范,合理配置警察职权,不仅是保障警察执法活动和警察个体权益的需要,而且是更有效地保护执法相对人的权益、公民的权益、社会公共利益的需要.     

警察权益保护理论研究

警察权益具有普遍性和特殊性,既包括警察的执法权益,也包括警察作为公民应享有的基本权利。警察权益的救济途径和制度保障路径的合理配置,是警察权益保障的当然选择,也是实现依法治国、依法行政的必然要求。     

我国警察健康权的缺失及其保障措施

我国警察健康权的缺失,不利于社会秩序的稳定和国家的长治久安。分析警察健康权缺失的原因,有针对性地提出保障警察健康权的具体措施:通过多种途径弥补警力的不足,避免警察积劳成疾;增加袭警成本,减少暴力袭警事件的发生;最后提出警察健康权受损后的补救措施,即受侵害警察可以通过司法救济途径向加害人请求赔偿和建立警察因公伤亡保险制度。     

警察执法权益保护论纲

警察权益具有普遍性和特殊性,既包括警察的执法权益,也包括警察作为公民应享有的基本权利。警察权益遭受侵害,既有社会转型期社会矛盾加剧、公民法律意识淡薄、违法犯罪暴力化倾向严重和法制不健全、对侵害警察权益行为惩治力度不够、暴力袭警成本较低等原因;也有警察自身执法能力不高、自我防护意识不强和防护装备落后,以及公安机关不善于充分利用现有法律武器维权等多方面的原因。由此看来,保护警察权益是一项系统工程,必须采取多方面的措施。     

司法警察死刑执行心理防护研究

人民法院司法警察在死刑执行工作中经常会面对各种极端应激源,所造成的应激反应往往是强烈的、反复的,若不加以适当干预,将会发展为应激障碍等心理疾患。通过与美国死刑执行程序进行比较,从人丈关怀的角度出发,我们对死刑执行人员的确定、执行装备的选择、死刑罪犯的押解、刑场操作、执行后心理调适与干预等均应进行针对性的心理防护设计,从制度上保证司法警察的心理健康,防止非战斗减员的发生。     

警察权益保障的立法建议

警察群体是我国诸多机关群体中的重要组成部分。肩负着保卫国家社会安定、人民安居乐业的重要职责。警察权益的保障是提高警察工作积极性的重要前提。更是维系国家执法权威的关键。但目前暴力抗法、暴力袭警等违法犯罪行为严重地侵害了警察的人格权、健康权甚至生命权。本文分析了我国警察权益保障的现状,并结合国外警察权益保障的经验。提出了完善我国警察权益保障的立法建议。     

The British Police Experience

[Editor's note] The following is the text Sir Eric St. Johnston delivered before the members of the Wichita Crime Commission at their 24th Annual dinner meeting on October 19, 1977. Sir Eric St. Johnston is formerly of the Chief of Scotland Yard and Chief Inspector of Constabulary for England and Wales. Among others, he is a Knight of the Order of the Thistle, holder of the Commander Order of the British Empire, the Queen's Police Medal and the French Legion of Honour and Croix de Guerre. In his text, Sir Eric mentions various similarities and and dissimilarities regarding the police practices of two countries. He is of the opinion that there are a great deal of advantages in a centralized police system as contrasted to the American counterpart. This statement is similar to the Editor's assertion made some ten years ago. [Re: “Police Reorganization As A Deterrent to Crime,” Police, Vol. 12, No. 14, March-April, 1978, pp. 73–79. See also Crime and Delinquency Abstracts, Vol. 16, National Clearinghouse for Mental Health Information of the U.S. Department of HEW, Public Service, 1969, p. 589] Readers will find Sir Eric's text not only timely, stimulating and provocative, but also insightful through his comparison of his long career in English police with that of the United States' police. Certainly his remarks provide police planners and policy makers with what should be most pressing needs for combating the ever-increasing crime in England, the United States, and the world as a whole. The permission to reprint was obtained from Sir Eric by the Editor personally. The Editor wishes to take this opportunity to thank Mr. Maurice W. Corcoran, Managing Director, and his colleagues Mr. Will G. Price, Jr., President; Mr. Jay W. Swanson, Chairman of the Board; Mr. J. A. Mull, Jr., Past President; and Mr. William L. Connelly, Chairman, Annual Dinner Committee; all of the Wichita Crime Commission for their efforts and cooperation.     

警察形象战略的基石：警察核心价值观

警察形象战略是在新形势下开展警察公共关系建设,促进警察机关和人民群众的沟通和理解,密切警民关系的有效载体。而警察核心价值观的确立和培育则是警察形象战略中最为重要的一个环节,它可以使警察形象建设达到事半功倍的效果。     

The Control of Police Powers

This article points to a frequent feature in debates about the control of the police. Aside from cultural and political characteristics in the last decades, policing has changed and at present it is going through a stage of rapid change. The author defines the historical roots of police in democracies. He places the police within the framework of the sovereign state, the administration, the judiciary and the citizens. The state's control of police powers is described in its interdependency with new demands on the part of citizens regarding micro (domestic sphere/neighbourhood/community) and macro (urban sphere/state/European) levels. On a European scale, the article provides an oversight over the existing network consisting of internal, administrative, parliamentarian, judiciary, and civil (non-government/social movements) control agencies and mechanisms. In its conclusions the concept of ethical standards is introduced as a means of effective high-quality police management.     

The Police Lag Behind

A fully fledged police force will not appear in Russia before December: so far they have not even managed to recertify the heads of the central office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs [MVD].     

警察权的缘起

运用阶级分析的方法对警察权的缘起等警学基本问题进行解析固然应该，但以和谐社会理论为指导．对警察权问题进行多维视角探讨更加必要。需要是警察权产生的内在动机和驱动力；秩序是维系社会群体存续的基础．警察权应社会共同体维护秩序、控制冲突的诉求而产生。但并不是任何时态下的社会秩序都是合理的、有活力的、合乎民意的，人们更需要警察权所维护的是一个正义的秩序。基于正义的普适性特征和人类对于正义秩序的追求，警察权被赋予其存在的合理性。     

警察武力之“真”法良治——论警察武力行为法律构成的合规律性

警察武力法至“真”包括至“真”之的、至“真”之度、至“真”之路、至“真”之果四个基本论题.警察武力法至“真”应达到警察武力行为法律构成、理论构成、事实构成的逻辑统一性;所有警察武力行为法律要件、法律结构的总体同一性;总体、类体、次类体和个体警察武力行为法律要件、法律结构的系统统一性.将警察武力行为嵌在警察武力权场域各种位置之间的客观关系中观察、解析,所有警察武力行为均由主体、客体、主观意志和客观行动四个要件构成,且存在生成和运行规律.     

警察文化的理论定位

作为精神文化的警察文化反映警察文化的本质属性,作为政治文化和社会文化的警察文化反映了警察文化的本质维度。警察文化自然还应该是一种管理文化,但是,它内在地属于包含于政治文化中的行政文化和组织文化范畴。政治文化和社会文化之间是一种相互规定的关系,二者的集合构成警察文化的完整内容。警察文化在政治和社会两个维度上辩证地展开决定警察文化对警务活动支撑的内在逻辑。     

电子警察法律问题研究

电子警察的使用对维护道路交通秩序、保障交通安全功不可没,然而,由于不规范执法因素的存在,导致电子警察获取的资料在作为证据使用时遇到了法律的挑战,这就需要尽快制定有关电子警察的立法.     

The Logic of Sexism Among Police

This research assumes an interpretive point of view to examine the underlying logic of sexist ideology among police. It is suggested that women police crystallize meanings of certain cultural oppositions in terms of gender categories. Female-male dichotomies become the basis for reading oppositions that are primarily organizational and these in turn are mediated by higher level meanings and unconscious fantasies about men and women. Men's sexist attitudes and behaviors towards policewomen are examined in terms of these historically specific and situationally derived cultural and unconscious meanings.