增强新时代青年大学生的文化自信研究

中华优秀传统文化为增强新时代青年大学生的文化自信提供丰厚滋养,中国革命文化为增强新时代青年大学生的文化自信提供精神支撑,中国特色社会主义先进文化为增强新时代青年大学生的文化自信提供发展沃土。新时代青年大学生的文化自信的现实基础是中华优秀传统文化、中国革命文化和中国特色社会主义先进文化。增强新时代青年大学生的文化自信应坚持以马克思主义理论为指导、培育社会主义核心价值观、加强高校的思想政治教育、开展"互联网+文化"建设。     

优秀传统文化对高校学生教育管理的影响

新的历史时代,高校教育工作者需要把中华优秀传统文化融入青年学生的教育管理工作中,指导大学生积极响应习近平总书记的号召,加深对优秀传统的理解和学习,以此指导实际行动,增强文化自信,夯实文化根基。论文探讨中华优秀传统文化的内涵,研究优秀传统文化对新时代高校青年学生文化自信、素质教育的影响,为进一步加强高校青年思想政治教育工作,提出对策建议及延伸思考。     

中华优秀传统文化融入高校思想教育途径探讨

中华优秀传统文化是我国思想政治教育的重要资源,加强中华优秀传统文化教育是深化"中国梦"思想宣传教育和培育社会主义核心价值观的重要基础。当前不少大学生对中华优秀传统文化的认识存在疑惑、偏差甚至错误,传统文化教育受到西方文化的干扰。应把中华优秀传统文化融入思想政治理论课程建设和融入校园文化建设中。     

习近平传统文化观对大学生思想政治教育的价值

习近平总书记在多种场合提到了传统文化,并针对中华传统文化发表了一系列讲话、看法、著作,逐渐形成习近平传统文化观。习近平传统文化观是新时期下对中华优秀传统文化的高度概括和重新认识,是中国共产党重视对优秀传统文化的传承的鉴证,具有重大的理论和现实意义。大学生处于心理和生理以及价值观形成的关键期,大学的全方位育人对新时代大学生思想政治教育提出更高要求,如何做好、做活、做细、做美大学生思想政治教育工作是当下高校思政工作值得探讨的问题。习近平传统文化观丰富了大学生思想政治教育的形式和内容、有助于提高思想政治教育育人的渗透力、有助于大学生形成积极向上的人生态度,对中华优秀传统文化的深度解读和高度概括为大学生思想政治教育提供了新的活力和好的素材,具有重要价值。     

新媒体下绵阳传统文化与思想政治教育的融合

中华优秀传统文化作为思想政治教育中的重要资源,对大学生社会主义核心价值观的塑造起着重要作用。新媒体给中华优秀传统文化的传承提供了新的机遇。高校思想政治教育要不断创新课程的内容和形式,提高思想政治教育的实效性。     

纲要课教材应用中华优秀传统文化的新改进

《中国近现代史纲要》教材2015修订版继承了以往版本应用中华优秀传统文化的基本观点并进行了创新。2015版高度评价了中华文明,平衡了弘扬中华优秀传统文化与反对封建主义之间的关系,厘清了中华优秀传统文化与儒学的瓜葛,批驳了"历史虚无主义"的错误立场,确立了以实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦为本质的历史主线。这些新改进有力推动了高校思想政治教学应用中华优秀传统文化的创新。     

校园文化视域下高校思想政治教育的对策研究

高校校园文化作为社会主义先进文化的重要组成部分,是当前高校思想政治教育工作的重要平台。面对新时代背景下的诸多困境,高校必须从以下方面着手加强校园文化建设,才能充分发挥校园文化的思想政治教育功能,从而使高校思想政治教育工作得到落实和提升。坚持社会主义核心价值观的引领;丰富校园精神文化的内涵;占领校园网络舆论的主阵地;弘扬中华传统文化之"魂"的凝聚力。     

中华优秀传统文化在大学生思想政治教育中的应用

随着我国素质教育改革的不断深入,在当今时代背景下,我国政府极为重视高校思想政治教育的发展情况,并且出台了多项关于高校思想政治教育的指导性文件。在这种大环境下,我国诸多高校思想政治教育教师纷纷投入到高校思想政治教育发展路径的研究中,经过长时间的实践调查研究发现,有效地将中华优秀传统文化元素融入到大学思想政治教育当中,不仅可以弘扬我国优秀的传统文化,同时还可以极大提升大学思想政治教育的质量以及效率。本文主要就中华优秀传统文化在大学生思想政治教育中的应用做了简要分析,目的在于进一步提升大学生思想政治教育的成效。     

以文化人在高校思政教育中的运用探析

在高校思想政治教育过程中发挥以文化人功用,必须把握文化力量之源、中华优秀传统文化之根、社会主义核心价值观之魂。高校思想政治教育运用以文化人的实践路径,需要做到坚定高校思想政治教育者的文化自信、融文化于高校思想政治教育全过程、坚守网络文化阵地。     

浅析中华优秀传统文化的守正与创新

中华优秀传统文化是历史的结晶,在漫长的历史发展中,逐渐升华出"仁""民本""诚信""见利思义"等宝贵的思想精髓。"双创"方针即对优秀传统文化进行创造性转化和创新性发展,要求我们在深入发掘中华传统文化蕴藏的丰富资源的基础上,深刻认知其时代价值,理解、把握中华优秀传统文化创造性转化和创新性发展的时代意义,从前提条件、关键环节、动力引擎、突出优势、扫除障碍等环节探寻"双创"方针的实现路径,从而推动中华优秀传统文化在新时代的传承与创新。     

Europeanization and Institutional Change in Vocational Education and Training in Austria and Germany

This article analyzes how the EU's vocational education and training (VET) policy is reflected in domestic reforms in Germany and Austria. It perceives Europeanization as a heuristic concept to disentangle a twofold process of institutional change: The first process, the "Europeanized" arena of change, concerns change initiated by the reactions of domestic actors to EU initiatives; the second process of change—the "domestic" arena of change—concerns the ongoing incremental endogenous change in domestic institutions beneath and independent from the Europeanized arena of institutional change. This procedure allows us to differentiate between two modes of Europeanization: In Germany, Europeanization occurs as reform policies and politics; in Austria, Europeanization occurs more as institutional change by default, hence without strategically enacted reform initiatives shaped by the EU and as domestic institutional change that occurs anyway. The article combines the case-oriented method of difference with process tracing.     

Concept and Politics in Derrida and Deleuze

Abstract

This paper points to significant similarities between the political orientations of Deleuze and Derrida. Derrida's appeal to a pure form of existing concepts (absolute hospitality, pure forgiveness, and so on) parallels Deleuze and Guattari's distinction between relative and absolute ‘deterritorialisation’. In each case, the absolute form of the concept is a condition of the possibility of change.     

Structure and Process in Consociationalism and Federalism

It is relatively easy to characterize the institutional structureof a country as consociational or federal. The task is muchmore difficult if we turn from structure to the decision process.Within a given structure, there may be a great deal of variationwith regard to the decision process. Data for such variationare given for the decision process in Switzerland for whichthe following four types are distinguished: (1) consociationaland federal, (2) consociational and unitary, (3) competitiveand federal, and (4) competitive and unitary. Difficulties arediscussed in aggregating from such a variation to a measurefor the prevailing decision process in a country as a whole.It is suggested that the problem be disaggregated and that decisionprocesses be compared for particular issues. This can be doneboth across and within countries.     

Turnout determinants in democracies and in non-democracies

Elections are celebrated in democracies as well as in non-democracies. Studies on the factors explaining turnout normally focus, however, only on democracies. Are turnout patterns different in non-democracies? If so, how different are those? In this paper I address this issue with a unique dataset covering 1251 elections −678 democratic (in 107 countries) and 250 nondemocratic elections (in 81 countries) for the lower house and 209 democratic (in 57 countries) and 114 nondemocratic (in 60 countries)- for the period 1961–2008. I find that the turnout determinants are contingent upon the regimes and that the most important differences lay in the institutional and in the political factors.     

Rhetoric and Action in Regulating the Public Schools in Norway and Sweden

In the past few decades, Norway and Sweden, like the rest of the Western world, have attempted to restructure and deregulate education. In both countries, the established governing models were threatened due to lack of legitimacy and efficiency. This article discusses the extent to which the different explanations of stability and institutional change address what happened when Management by Objectives and Results (MbOR) was introduced in Norway and Sweden. However, both the content and the course of change were different in the two countries. More specifically, one can talk about processes combining lock‐in mechanism and layering in the Norwegian course of development. In Sweden, the process of change was characterized by sudden and radical decisions. A decision made in 1991 could be explained as a state of punctuated equilibrium, as strong forces produced a situation where nothing else was to be done except make a radical change, turning the centralized system into a decentralized one. The period has parallels to the concept of ‘critical juncture’, representing a moment of openness to and possibility for different and new actors to influence a new constitution. In Norway, the transformation of policy tools for education purposes has thus far dominated the process and direction of change. In Sweden, through processes of conversion, the policy tool has gained a more dominating influence over education policy. Accordingly, there was a stronger emphasis on MbOR in its original version in Sweden than in Norway, which has transformed and defined the concept in line with educational purposes. This article outlines two cases of institutional change that combine elements of lock in with new developments. In neither Norway nor Sweden was the development pushed further in the same trajectory, rather it was transformed and, in the case of Sweden, radically changed within a larger nationally specific framework of sequence of events, values, norms and traditions of policy making.     

我国规范性文件备案审查地方立法的若干缺陷及其完善

全国31个省级人民政府均已通过地方立法建立了规范性文件备案审查制度.这些立法存在诸多缺陷,必须进一步予以完善:一是缺乏完整、统一、合理的审查程序;二是备案审查程序缺乏刚性的期限规定或周期过长;三是审查标准不够完备、不便操作或过于简单;四是有关自行纠正建议和处理决定的规定不够具体、明确;五是未妥善处理好与行政复议一并审查制度以及地方各级人大常委会备案审查制度的衔接关系.