我国高校开展"诊所式法律教育"模式初探

诊所式法律教育作为一种新的教学理念已在我国发展了十个年头,虽然硕果累累,但是仍然面临着诊所式法律教育本土化"中国模式"的探索.本文着重对比中外诊所式法律教育面临的法律文化制度、法学教育制度、法律职业制度三个层次的体制差异,指出了我国高校开展"诊所式法律教育"必须探索"高校+公益机构"的发展模式.     

法律援助与"诊所法律教育"

法律援助与"诊所法律教育"关系密切,它们往往交织在一起.美国的法律援助与诊所法律教育紧密相联.中国从美国引入诊所法律教育以后,也与法律援助结合在一起.通过法律援助,法律诊所的学生提高了法律意识,丰富了法律知识,也提高了法律工作能力.今后,中国可以在法律援助中进一步办好诊所法律教育,发挥其积极作用.     

法学"诊所式"教学模式的困境与出路

我国法学教育长期以来过分强调知识教育而忽视职业能力培养,严重脱离法律实践.诊所式模式更注重学生实践能力的培养,能够弥补我国传统法学教学的不足,使学生在教师的指导下有更多实践机会,教与学的互动更加明显.但作为一种舶来品,法律诊所教育在我国仍面临种种发展障碍,本文在分析这些障碍的基础上探讨了诊所教育与传统法学教育的对接途径,主张兼采法学传统教育与诊所教育两者之长推动高等法学教育的科学发展.     

医事法律专业法律诊所教育研究

在医事法律实践教学中引入法律诊所教育,可以培养师生的实践能力,促进学生职业素养的形成,加强医学与法学复合型人才适应社会的能力。开办医事法律专业的高校在引进法律诊所教育时,应针对我国目前"大法学"法律诊所教育中存在的问题,在机构、经费、师资、制度、案源等方面给予一定的政策倾斜和保障。     

浅析“诊所式法律教育”模式中国化的思考

"诊所式"法律教育是20世纪60年代后,在美国开始流行的一种实践性法律教育模式。它对于中国法律教育改革和完善,具有重要的借鉴价值。可是"诊所式"法律教育作为一种舶来的新型教育模式,与我国传统法律教学模式存在诸多的差异。这就为"诊所式"法律教学模式的中国化带来了相当大的不便.因此,我们必须想办法弥补这种差异,并且实现外来模式与本土模式的有机结合,促进我国法律教育模式的完善。     

诊所法律教育评价体系若干问题研究

诊所法律教育评价体系是诊所法律教育的重要问题。本文从诊所法律教育的基本特征入手,阐述诊所法律教育的评价方法、评价的基本原则和诊所法律教育目标对评价的影响,并在考察国外同行做法的基础上,提出建立我国诊所法律教育评价体系的构想。     

诊所法律教育在中国制度化建设中亟待解决的问题

作为一种舶来的新型教育模式,诊所法律教育在我国的法学教育中还处于边缘地带。本文认为,诊所法律教育应当被正式纳入中国法学教育的课程体系中;诊所法律教育与法律援助相辅相成,共同实现推动社会正义和培养更具社会适应性的法律人之目的;诊所法律教育在中国的制度化建设应当着重解决成本与经费、诊所师资、管理人员等问题。     

诊所法律教育与相关法律教育关系论纲

诊所法律教育是现代法律教育的一种形式。推行诊所法律教育,首先应当正确认识和处理与传统法律教育、法律教学实践、律师实务等相关法律教育模式的关系,以促进诊所法律教育的健康发展,完善我国的法律教育。     

诊所式法律教育在中国发展的困境与对策

诊所式法律教育是发端于美国的一种新型法学教育方法。我国自2000年秋季开始尝试运用诊所式法律教育,已经取得了可喜的成绩。作为法律职业教育的有效方法,诊所式法律教育应该得到我国法学院校的普遍推广运用。但作为一种舶来的教育模式,在不同的生存环境下,诊所式法律教育难免在继受发展过程中面临诸多困境。我国法学界必须开拓创新,转变观念,进行相关制度的改革,为诊所式法律教育在中国的发展寻找出路。     

论我国诊所法律教育存在的问题以及改进——以行政法领域为视角

诊所法律教育的兴起对于提升法学教育的水平、深化我国的法学教育改革有着积极的作用。诊所法律教育的开展需要具备一定的基础条件,在当前,我国的诊所法律教育依然存在着一系列的问题,需要采取有效的措施予以改进。     

诊所法律教育探析

近年来,诊所法律教育在弥补了体统法学教育的弊端的基础上在中国获得了飞速的发展。但起源于美国的诊所法律教育要本土化并得以在我国普遍推行,目前尚存在很多障碍。本文结合中国的现实,提出了相应的具有实际意义的解决对策。     

我国法律方法教育的反思

在法学教育中,法律方法即把法律规范运用到裁判案件中所采用的方法具有双重属性,即知识的属性和能力的属性。就法律方法的知识属性而言,它应成为法学教学中的知识传授对象,就法律方法的能力属性而言,它又是法律人才必备的素养。目前,我国法学教育既没有重视法律方法知识在法律人才培养中的作用,也没建立起较完善的训练法律技能的有效机制。法律方法教育是我国目前法学教育的薄弱环节,因而应当成为当下法学教育必须重视并着力解决的根本性问题之一。     

A tribute and a legacy: Clinical legal education and the bountiful harvest

The pioneering work of Madhava Menon is well known to many. This article pays tribute to his memory and briefly examines what he has left behind in terms of changes to the way we think of, design, and deliver legal education across the world. The concepts that Dr Menon and others helped to sow and propagate are now blooming across the world. Before his untimely passing, he would have seen some of the fruits of such labour in his own country and beyond, but the legacy is much more than this. There is now a global movement of clinical legal education practitioners who are sustaining and developing the ideas and models that this legacy bequeathed. Using a mix of personal anecdotes and reference to relevant published works, this article explores the relevant detail and concludes that clinical legal education is in safe, competent, and creative hands.

     

19世纪英国大学法律教育的开展

法律教育是培养法律人才的重要途径,而法律教育机制是随着社会发展而不断调整和变革的。工业革命后英国社会发展对法律教育提出了现实需求,在新的历史条件下,英国以伦敦大学为代表的新大学和以牛津与剑桥为代表的古老大学都加入到法律教育的事业中来,使得英国法律教育体制从中世纪以律师会馆为主体的学徒制——经验型法律教育逐渐发展到以大学和法律职业组织分工合作的现代学院制法律教育,英国法律教育体制实现了从传统到现代的转型。     

从矛盾到协调:我国法学本科与研究生教育关系之合理厘定——以完善我国司法考试制度为基轴

我国现行法学高等教育模式并不明确,使得法学本科教育与研究生教育存在着目标设定、发展模式的宏观混同以及教学方式、内容微观重叠等诸多积弊。厘清二者的关系既是提升我国法学高等教育质量之必须,又是我国法律职业共同体形成之前提。建议首先明确我国法学高等教育的发展模式,合理引入司法实务训练,并以完善我国既有司法考试制度为基轴,进一步厘定法学本科与研究生教育的关系。     

NR Madhava Menon: The guiding light for global clinical legal education

The late NR Madhava Menon, known widely as ‘the father of modern legal education in India’, was also a leading voice for global legal education reform by championing ‘socially relevant legal education’ through clinical legal education throughout the world. This article concentrates on his seminal role in the founding of the Global Alliance for Justice Education (GAJE) and the crafting of its mission statement. Drawing on a number of key moments in Dr Menon’s lifelong dedication to the twin causes of legal education and social justice, it highlights how he brought an international perspective to his critical work on legal education reform in India by enlisting international collaborators, how he motivated international colleagues to bring similar reforms to their countries, and how he mentored new generations of legal educators in what has become a true global clinical movement. The article focuses specifically on how the guiding principles of GAJE’s inaugural conference, which Dr Menon co-chaired in 1999, reflect his vision of global clinical legal education that continues to guide GAJE and the global clinical movement today.

     

A qualitative study of the impact of law clinics on students’ perceptions of emotional labour expectations

The benefits to students of being given some form of clinical legal education are well documented. Research has been conducted in the area of legal education and emotion, emotional intelligence and clinical legal education. There have also been studies which explore emotional labour in the legal profession. However, there is currently no research into the role of clinical legal education in advancing law students’ understanding of emotional labour expectations in the legal profession. This Legal Education Research Network (LERN) funded project aims to fill that gap by examining the contribution law clinics make to the development of law students’ emotion management skills in preparation for entry into the legal profession. The project seeks to achieve this by considering the changes to law students’ perceptions of emotional labour expectations as a result of undertaking this type of clinical legal education. The paper offers insights into the types of emotional labour as well as the perceived drivers of emotional labour, which are regarded as necessary to fulfil the role of the solicitor. The paper will also analyse the potential consequences of performing emotional labour identified by participants.     

“诉累”的法经济学分析

“诉累”是司法界经常使用的一个术语。从法经济学的角度看“诉累”的产生原因在于普法力度不够、司法权力寻租、低下的司法效率、委托代理、较高的诉讼成本、行政机关对司法活动的干涉、较低的司法素质。诉累导致“租的耗散”、激化社会矛盾,导致司法公信的丧失和“理性”的违约行为。应加强普法活动、切实保证司法独立、全面提高司法人员的素质,健全法律援助制度、确立权力与责任相统一的原则。     

Disclosing health information breaches of confidence,privacy and the notion of the "treating team"

The authors utilise cases collected during a randomised population survey to illustrate some of the legal and policy issues concerning routine transfers of information between treating practitioners. Their analysis suggests that implied consent for many routine uses of health information should not be assumed. An important part of consent to health information disclosure is the patients' ability to tailor its scope and content. This requires that they should be provided with additional information. Introducing the measures advised into the clinical setting would bring health information-gathering practices closer to compliance with the collection principles contained in Australian information privacy legislation.