影响政府公信力的因素

随着我国社会主义市场经济制度的不断完善，社会公众对政府诚信建设的愿望愈加迫切，尤其在加入世贸后，国际做法开阔了国人的视野，推进政府诚信建设、提高政府公信力已经成为社会公众的普遍共识。党和国家审时度势，提出了打造诚信政府建设、提高政府公信力的战略要求。     

重塑政府的公信力

公信力是政府政治合法性的根基,关系到社会的稳定。然而目前我国政府公信力的缺失已经成为阻碍社会发展的瓶颈,虽然造成这种局面的因素有很多,有政府方面的、公众方面的、社会方面的等,但是政府自身存在的问题是导致公信力流失的主要因素。因此,为弥补诚信缺失,打造阳光政府,重塑政府的公信力,政府必须转变职能,以公民需求为本位公开公共信息,提升危机管理能力,同时培育健康成熟的公民社会也是重塑政府公信力的需要。     

伦理视域下地方政府公信力建设

本文主要是从伦理角度对加强地方政府公信力建设进行研究，将政府公信力与我国地方实际情况相结合，对政府公信力的涵义、我国地方政府公信力建设存在的问题、及对策进行探讨。     

和谐社会观照下的政府诚信建设

诚信不仅是和谐社会的本义所在,而且与民主法治、公平正义、安定有序等密切相关.没有诚信,特别是没有政府诚信,就不可能有社会的和谐,构建和谐社会的目标也无法实现.目前,社会层面表现出的诚信缺乏现象,其实都与政府诚信有着一定联系.因此,认真审视和检讨政府诚信问题,提高政府公信力,重塑政府诚信新形象,让政府自身成为遵循诚实守信及信赖保护准则的示范者,是加强政府自身建设,构建和谐社会的理性选择.     

影响政府公信力的因素

<正>随着我国社会主义市场经济制度的不断完善,社会公众对政府诚信建设的愿望愈加迫切,尤其在加入世贸后,国际做法开阔了国人的视野,推进政府诚信建设、提高政府公信力已经成为社会公众的普遍共识。党和国家审时度势,提出了打造诚信政府建设、提高政府公信力的战略要求。针对我国政府公信力存在的问题,学术界加强理论研究,把中央的战略要求贯彻到理论研究的成果中。     

浅谈增强政府公信力

政府公信力的增强,对于团结人民群众、实现政府职能,创新社会管理、改进公共服务和构建和谐社会具有重要意义;要增强政府公信力,政府机关及公务员就要诚信负责、注重公平、强化服务、追求绩效、依法行政,并加强自身建设,规范行政行为,取信于民,立信于社会。     

政府诚信建设问题浅探

政府诚信在社会信用体系建设中居于核心和主导地位,它直接影响社会信用体系的发展进程,决定社会信用体系的建设质量.因此,必须高度重视政府诚信建设,充分发挥政府诚信在社会信用体系建设中的先导和表率作用,认真研究加强政府诚信建设、努力提高政府公信力的对策措施,推进社会信用体系的健康深入发展.     

提高政府公信力的现实意义及路径选择

政府公信力是政府通过自己的行为得到社会公众信任和认可的能力.如何提高政府公信力,事关中国特色社会主义事业发展,事关社会和谐稳定.提高政府公信力,是一个系统工程,也是一项长期任务.当前,提高政府执行力需要重点抓好:健全科学决策、民主决策、依法决策机制:推进攻务公开,增强公共政策制定透明度和公众参与度；推进政务公开,增强公共政策制定透明度和公众参与度；加强行政问贲制,完善政府绩效评估制度；加强行政人员的行政伦理建设.     

提升政府公信力建设公信政府

政府公信力体现了政府的信用能力,反映了公民对政府的信任程度。公信政府是拥有较强公信力,为公众所普遍 信任的政府。本文分析了我国现阶段政府公信力的现状,探讨了提升政府公信力,建设公信政府的必要性,并为建设公信政 府提出了若干建议。     

地方政府公信力影响因素研究

公信力是政府职能履行有效性和政府行为合法性的重要保障。从公众感知的视角出发,综合运用文献分析与量化研究方法,探讨地方政府公信力的影响因素以及各种因素的影响程度,这有助于推动政府公信力的理论和实践发展。研究发现,地方政府公信力的影响因素及其影响程度排序依次为治理效果的良善性、治理主体的参与程度、行政过程的科学性和服务质量的优质性。基于此,通过构建科学的绩效评估体系、打造协商沟通平台、深化"放管服"改革、强化精准服务能力以及重视数字政府建设,不断提升人民群众的获得感、幸福感、安全感,以增强地方政府的公信力,推动政府治理能力的现代化。     

中国公共政策制定中的政府俘获及其解决对策

中国公共政策制定中的政府俘获主要有国有垄断企业有力影响政府的决策、地方支柱企业绑架地方政府的决策、向政府官员提供非法的个人所得三种表现形式。政府俘获产生的原因包括企业与政府形成利益共同体、以GDP增长为核心的政绩考核体系、政府反腐败不力及廉政建设滞后、各社会群体参与不均衡、政府权力缺乏制约,法治不健全等方面。解决这一问题应从以下几方面采取措施:减少政府对市场经济的干预、保障民众的结社权利,培育公民社会、实现政策制定的公开透明和广泛参与,严惩政府官员腐败行为、加强廉政制度建设,建立以科学发展观为指导的政绩考核体系。     

Fifteen Years After Decentralization by Devolution: Political‐administrative Relations in Tanzanian Local Government

One of the professed goals of the 1998 Tanzanian Local Government Reform Program, entailing substantial decentralization, was to provide for a democratic administrative set up in local government. Elected local councils were invested with responsibilities for a wide range of policy sectors and services; the local administrative staff, formerly recruited and instructed by central government, would be appointed by and accountable to the local councils. A well‐functioning local politico‐administrative system was considered paramount to improve service delivery and ensure control of decision making by the local community. This article reports on research into the relations between councilors and administrators in two Tanzanian municipalities. Overall, these relations were found to be tense and full of discordance, caused by clashing role perceptions and mutual distrust. The research suggests that the main factor underlying the behavior and attitudes of councilors and administrators is the very system of public administration, which — despite the ambitions expressed in the Local Government Reform Program — remains very centralistic in character. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

公民社会兴起背景下的政府公信力建设

随着我国公民社会的日益兴起,公众的主体意识、权利意识逐步增强,公共服务需求的内容及层次要求也相应地发生巨大变化,它们构成了政府公信力建设的外部环境与压力。如何将外部环境的要求与压力内化到政府管理制度及成员的行为规范之中,这是我国政府公信力建设需要研究的重要议题。确立以公民和社会为本位的价值理念,构建新型公共治理模式,在政治过程中实现与公民社会良性互动,是提升政府公信力的现实选择。     

Less Haste,More Speed: The Fit for the Future Reform Program in New South Wales Local Government

In August 2011 the New South Wales (NSW) Government established the Independent Local Government Review Panel to examine the options for improving the sustainability of the NSW local government sector. In October 2014 the NSW Government set out its response in its Fit for the Future reform program. This paper provides a critical assessment of the Fit for the Future program. We show that it contains errors, relies on unreliable data, and neglects important factors, which may be ascribed to the haste with which it has been constructed. This could have serious consequences given the potential impact the Fit for the Future program will have on NSW local government. We thus conclude that it would be prudent to address these matters before proceeding further with the program.     

Legislating deliberative engagement: Is local government in Victoria willing and able?

Growing dissatisfaction with representative democracy and concomitantly, the increasing expectation that citizens assert more influence over public policy have seen the emergence of more participatory and deliberative forms of governance in public management practice. This article explores the attempt of the state government of Victoria, Australia to legislate for mandatory deliberative engagement as part of its local government strategic planning instruments. The ambition of the reform was significant; however, it was almost unanimously rejected by the local government sector. Based on analysis of the key themes that emerged from the submissions made during the 3-year Victorian Local Government Act Review process, we explore the limitations and barriers to implementing deliberative engagement practice at a local government level. We demonstrate that whilst the promise of participatory democracy might have been compelling, in the case of Victoria there were a series of contextual and capacity considerations that needed to be taken into account before the implementation of such reforms were pursued.     

中国边疆民族政策的实证调查

边疆多民族地区的经济建设和社会发展，是政府主导型的一个社会进程，中国政府在这个过程中承担着重大的政治责任和社会责任。本文通过对中国政府在边疆多民族地区经济、社会领域若干政策的回顾，以及对边疆多民族地区社会现状的调查，指出长期以来“效率优先”的改革思想，地方政府“效率单边独追”的畸形发展方式与中央政府“民族主义”的政策导向，是造成边疆地区对中央政府政策认同度低的重要原因。     

中国地方政府绩效外部民主评议模式——对南京市“万人评议机关”再研究

通过绩效评估可以提高政府效率，促使政府更好地承担社会管理、公共服务等各项职能。对于地方政府，外部民主评议模式比传统的上级政府外部监督模式更具针对性和可操作性。中国现阶段通过民主评议的方式可以扩大民泉有序地参与政治，推动地方政府更积极地承担地方建设发展责任，而不是一味靠上级政府的压力与刺激进行地方治理。     

Indigenous institutions and local government in the Torres Strait

The relationships between local governments and Indigenous institutions in Australia are unstudied, despite both being oriented to the local level. Related research focuses on the performance of Indigenous local governments, Indigenous forms of governance and its relation to local government, relations between local governments and Indigenous communities, and the intercultural dynamics of Indigenous and Western governance frameworks in local governments. This article presents the findings of a study that examines relations between local governments and Indigenous institutions in the Torres Strait, a relationship that is framed by s. 9(3) of the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld) (LGA) that allows local governments to ‘take account of Aboriginal tradition and Island custom’. A framework adapted from health-related studies, consisting of three alternative policy approaches—mainstreaming, indigenisation, and hybridisation—is used in this study to characterise relationships between local governments and Indigenous institutions. Kinship and country, two important Indigenous institutions, are marginalised in Queensland's mainstream system of local government, which in turn creates obstacles for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from participating and engaging in local government processes.

Points for practitioners

• Government that does not recognise the institutions which are fundamental to how Indigenous people govern will marginalise them from power.
• Indigenous institutions are legitimate actors whose voice must be considered within mainstreaming discussions.
• Representation within indigenous institutions influences local government relations.

     

新公共服务对新公共管理的批判与超越：——中国服务型政府建设路向分析

服务型政府是对政府职能的重新审视和定位,其实质是贯彻＂以人为本＂理念的制度架构。不仅有新公共管理所关注的如何从组织技术和管理手段等操作层面上改进公共服务效率的问题,更涉及到政府与公民关系的宪政民主主义的重构,涉及到公共行政的理念转变与制度创新。以新公共服务为代表的民主治理理论突破了新公共管理＂管理主义＂思维的窠臼,指出了一条通过政府与社会、公民关系的民主化治理模式的重构,推进公共行政改革,为服务型政府建设指明了正确的改革方向。     

当前地方政府开展绩效评估的难点与对策分析

政府绩效评估是政府管理创新的一种重要模式,开展政府绩效评估已成为一种世界性潮流,如何促进我国地方政府绩效评估的开展越来越为大家所关注。当前各级地方政府开展绩效评估面临着许多问题和难点,如何克服这些困难将对我国推进地方政府绩效评估具有重要影响。