亚洲基础设施投资银行:新兴多边开发金融机构

亚洲地区基础设施建设的缺乏严重阻碍了该地区经济的发展,为了改变这一现状,实现亚洲地区的互联互通。中国倡议成立亚洲基础设施投资银行,缓解成员方的基础设施建设资金需求的压力,这一倡议得到亚洲地区乃至世界的广泛支持。经过不到两年的谈判,亚洲基础设施投资银行的"基本法"《亚洲基础设施投资银行协定》签订,基本解决了亚洲基础设施投资银行的治理机构、运营模式、投票权等问题。亚洲基础设施投资银行的成立是亚洲和世界共赢的选择,不仅对亚洲经济,而且对欧洲乃至世界经济都具有深远意义。但亚洲基础设施投资银行仍面临众多挑战,只有克服这些挑战,才能提升亚洲基础设施投资银行的世界影响力,助力世界经济秩序的调整。     

亚洲基础设施投资银行向东盟互联互通建设提供融资的风险与对策

目前,东盟基础设施互联互通建设存在巨大的融资瓶颈,亚洲基础设施投资银行能有效地解决东盟基础设施互联互通建设资金不足的瓶颈。对此,本文在分析亚洲基础设施投资银行向东盟基础设施互联互通建设提供融资风险的基础上,认为有效地促进亚洲基础设施投资银行向东盟互联互通基础设施建设提供融资,应建立公正合理的融资机制和多元化的融资模式,正确化解地缘政治风险,控制基础设施投融资风险。     

中国—东盟海上航行安全法律合作的对策探讨

本文针对中国—东盟海上航行安全的法律合作,以《联合国海洋法公约》、《亚洲地区反海盗及武装劫船合作协定》为基础,阐述海盗罪的界定依据及管辖权机制的选择,根据公约与协定所存在的不足,为中国—东盟海上航行管辖权机制的建立与发展提供参考。中国—东盟海上航行安全的法律合作主要是依据洲际性法律合作机制,构建与完善地区性法律合作机制,全面拓展该机制的适用范围,通过联合护航、协助追捕海盗等方式,对东南亚海域的犯罪行为进行有力打击,确保中国—东盟的航运安全。     

创建中国—东盟银行思路研究

中国—东盟银行的定位类似于一个新型的亚洲开发银行,主要参与者为中国与东盟10国,将由中国主导牵头成立,对于加快人民币国际化进程、提升中国在中国—东盟自由贸易区的主导权和国际话语权等都具有重大意义。本文研究提出创建中国—东盟银行的总体构想,包括:中国—东盟银行的性质与宗旨、机构设置、主要职能、资金来源、主要业务、合作方式等,并对在广西南宁市创建中国—东盟银行的必要性、可行性进行分析,提出了相关对策建议,供决策参考。     

中国-东盟自由贸易区的构建及意义

中国—东盟贸易区从构想到现实,带动了本地区经济的发展,改变了亚洲的政治经济面貌,开创了双赢互利的新局面,将对双边、区域与东亚整体的发展产生积极深远的影响;极大地增强中国和东盟在世界经济中的份量,提高国际地位,并有利于亚洲地区的和平与稳定。     

中国与东盟国家相互投资的现状、特点及展望

通过对中国与东盟国家相互投资现状的分析可以得出,中国对东盟国家投资的特点是总体规模小,增长速度较快;投资项目平均规模偏小;投资的区位、产业比较集中和投资规模波动较大。东盟国家对中国的投资特点是:投资规模总体较大,但增速缓慢;受政治、经贸合作导向影响较深和投资规模波动较大等。本文提出以投资为契机,建设中国—东盟命运共同体;升级中国—东盟自由贸易区;通过亚洲基础设施投资银行和丝路基金来推动中国与东盟国家相互投资,实现互助共赢等建议。     

印度尼西亚民法之研究

本文在中国倡导"一带一路"建设和构建亚洲基础设施投资银行的背景下,对21世纪海上丝绸之路的必经之地和亚洲基础设施投资银行创始成员国的印度尼西亚的民法进行研究,以期为"一带一路"建设以及亚洲基础设施投资银行运作过程中出现法律问题时,可以了解和运用印度尼西亚民法。     

东亚经济圈的形成与扩大

序言 亚洲地区新兴工业化经济群体、东盟和中国这些东亚地区的国家与地区均持续取得了高速经济增长,同时相互扩大了贸易与投资,从而逐步地形成了地区性的经济圈。这一东亚经济圈正在向它的周边地区与外延地区扩展,经济增长区已经出现了扩大的征兆。此外,东盟、亚太经济合作组织、亚欧首脑会议等组织也正在努力进行区域内、区域外的经济合作。这些进展当然不断地提高了亚洲经济发展的潜力。本文拟从东亚经济圈的经济发展动力来探讨其形成与区域经济合作的进展。     

亚洲的安全困境与亚洲集体安全体系建设

亚洲区域缺少涵盖整个亚洲地区的集体安全体系是导致这个区域时常出现不安全状态的根本原因，特别是中国逐渐崛起，美国日渐衰弱，成为（或被认为）亚洲区域的不安全因素。要实现亚洲的长久和平，亚洲需要一个包括中国、美国和众多亚洲中小国家在内的多边集体安全体系，而不是如目前东盟或东盟与其他国家之间的安全对话这种次区域合作机制，也不是某些人的所谓中美G2机制．更不是冷战产物美日、美韩式的安全同盟。这个体系必须是包括安全、经贸、政治和外交等多方面有利于所有成员国的体系．其中虽难免存在大国主导权之争，但这种竞争不仅要受到大国之间互相制约，同时要受到众多中小国家的集体制约。     

世界银行的经验及其对筹建亚洲基础设施投资银行的启示

世界银行(WB)是全球最有影响力的多边开发金融机构,自成立以来对发展世界经济发挥了重要作用并积累了许多成功经验。本文拟简述世界银行成立的背景、成立的宗旨、职能的变迁、组织机构、资金来源、主要业务等,分析其发展现状、运行成效和存在的问题,总结其在投资管理、贷款评估机制、自我评估机制等方面的成功经验,并对筹建亚洲基础设施投资银行提出5个方面的启示和建议。     

A new model of Asian regionalism: does the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation have more potential than ASEAN?

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is an established player in Southeast Asia, while the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is an emergent force in Central Asia. This article comparatively assesses ASEAN and SCO to investigate the nature of each organization's model of cooperation and their utility in the contemporary political landscape in Asia. It argues that SCO differs from ASEAN on a few significant points: its composition and level of institutionalization. At the same time, both organizations have similar agendas and models of cooperation, emphasizing a common spirit, flexibility and a focus on regime security. The paper concludes that ASEAN's model of cooperation continues to be relevant to the contemporary Asian landscape, and its brand of loosely codified, informal and norm driven multilateralism continues to be durable and robust.     

构建高等教育合作关系：东盟大学联盟在东南亚的实践经验

本文重点阐述东南亚地区开展教育合作的重要性;指出东南亚地区要突出自己的特色和优势,加强内部合作,从而寻找到与外界合作的广阔空间;分析了东南亚地区高校开展合作的困难和问题,并着重介绍东盟大学联盟的教育交流项目和未来发展。     

B&R,AIIB: Opportunities for Enhancing FDI in South Asia

Implementation of China's Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road (B&R) initiative and the advent of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) have redirected attention to infrastructure building in economic development.The domestically driven B&R policy is rewriting the geoeconomic and geopolitical map of Eurasia,while AIIB catalyzes a positive change in the dynamics of international development cooperation.They provide opportunities for South Asia which has economic potential but limited foreign investment inflow thus far.     

Institutionalizing ASEAN: celebrating Europe through network governance

This article provides a new piece for two of the puzzles of institutionalized cooperation in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). First, with regard to the organization's four decades of existence, there has always been a marked gap between ASEAN's rhetorical goals of cooperation and its actual achievements. What explains these systematic failures of implementation? Second, from the outset, ASEAN was criticized for its light institutionalization, which failed to deliver the substantial cooperation goals. Despite selected institutional reforms, ASEAN's autonomy has not increased remarkably and it has not made any major institutional innovations. Why does ASEAN design institutions it does not use? Why does this transformation gap occur? The author suggests a sociological institutional explanation and argues that major impulses for cooperation have come from outside Southeast Asia, most importantly from Europe. By mimicking the European integration process, ASEAN member states have effectively created an isomorphic organization. The Association's institutional development reflects a concern for international legitimacy and less an objective functional demand arising from the specific interactions of member states. This copying process has led to network governance within the organization.     

Japan’s reluctance in East Asian economic integration

Until 1997, the only preferential trading arrangement, which existed in East Asia, was the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA). Former Prime Minister of Malaysia Tun Dr. Mahathir had realized earlier the deficiency of AFTA in terms of stimulating economic development. In 1990, he proposed to ASEAN members to form the East Asian Economic Group. Due to regional political factors, his proposal was turned down and replaced with the East Asian Economic Caucus in 1992. In 1997, again, he proposed that ASEAN needed to establish large economic cooperation with other countries in East Asia. His suggestion had been warmly responded by the members of East Asian countries. At the ASEAN summit in Manila 1999, ASEAN Plus 3 (APT) was created. ASEAN, China, Japan, and South Korea had agreed and reached a joint statement to form a free-trade area by the year 2020. The establishment of APT was timely since most countries in the world are moving toward establishing wider or larger economic blocs due to the failure of multilateralism of the WTO in creating a new trade agreement. However, there is a shortcoming in the process of building APT, in the minimal and uncertain role of Japan in integrating economies in East Asia. This behavior has disappointed members of the group. The intention of this paper is to discuss the behavior of Japan in the economic integration process in East Asia.

---

曲折的区域化进程——东盟成立的历史轨迹与缘起

关于东南亚国家联盟（简称“东盟”）成立的缘起,从历史的长镜头看,它是战后东南亚区域主义长期发展的结果,在经历了多次区域合作的失败后,东南亚终于出现了稳定而有生命力的区域合作组织。另一方面,从1960年代的局部发展来看,东盟的成立又是因成立马来西亚联邦造成的区域冲突的直接产物。     

论战后日本东亚区域合作政策及其走势

日本从 2 0世纪 6 0年代开始先后提出了一系列如“太平洋自由贸易区”等区域经济合作构想。进入新世纪 ,随着东亚区域经济合作的加快 ,日本东亚区域合作政策也进行了调整 ,面临着几种选择 :与东盟建成自由贸易区、加入中国—东盟自由贸易区、与中韩组成东亚区域合作体、与东亚各国签订双边自由贸易协定。但无论哪种选择都必须做好以下几点工作 :顺利实现区域合作重心的转移、加强与中国的合作以及改变不合理的分工体制。     

Global Economic Governance between China and the EU: the case of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

The recent establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the initiative launched by the People’s Republic of China in 2013 underpins Beijing’s intensions to promote its own narrative about global economic governance (GEG) as well as China’s readiness to play a far more proactive role at the international level. In the age of global power shifting and with 14 EU member-states part of the AIIB, the European Union (EU) necessitates to engage further with China, in particular, within the context of multilateral institutions. This article analyses the impact of China’s evolving global governance policies on the EU. China’s and EU’s approaches to the reform of global governance present both differences and similarities, yet, the article highlights EU’s needs to make sense to what extent China’s growing ascent in the realm of global governance is reshaping world’s regional and global architectures vis-à-vis financial multilateral cooperation.     

试论中国大陆学者对东南亚（东盟）区域合作的研究——以博士论文和学术专著为视角

东南亚地区是中国的周边地区,中国一贯重视发展与东南亚地区国家的关系,本文从博士论文和学术专著层面出发,分析和论述了中国大陆学者对东南亚(东盟)区域合作的研究状况和不足,认为:1,从研究领域看,中国大陆学者对东南亚(东盟)合作的研究主要是注重经济领域的研究,尤其是中国与东南亚(东盟)的经济合作;但是,对于其他方面的研究相对比较缺乏,特别是缺乏对东南亚合作的深入研究;2,从研究单位来看,云南省和北京市是中国大陆研究东南亚(东盟)合作的中心;3,从时间来看,中国大陆学者对东南亚(东盟)合作研究的兴趣逐年增加,特别是2003年之后。     

试论东盟对东亚共同体形成所起的作用

近10余年来由于受到“全球化”大潮的冲击,在东亚也出现了“地域化”思潮。面对同样的挑战,东亚各国已经意识到采取共同的经济文化防卫机制的迫切性与重要性。其中,东盟各国表现出了强烈的主体性。从亚洲主义的角度分析东亚地域所产生的“地域化”、“本土化”趋势的实质,可以确证东盟对东亚地区的经济合作、文化共创进而对东亚共同体的最终形成将日益发挥越来越重要的作用。