法学案例教学法的应用及完善

案例教学法是法学教学的一种重要教学方法,它在法学教育中越来越受到重视,并广泛应用于教学实践,取得了显著效果.笔者结合对于案例教学法的应用实践,从案例教学法的作用、案例教学在实践中存在的问题及具体应用对策几方面进行分析论证,阐述了笔者对于该教学方法的见解.     

案例教学法在《毛泽东思想和中国特色社会主义理论体系概论》教学中的运用

在<概论>课教学中,案例教学法有着重要的作用.它能够有效地实现<概论>课的教学目的,使其理论联系实际,最大限度地激发学生的学习兴趣,从而提高教学效果.正确运用案例教学法,要求课前充分准备、课堂精心组织.     

案例教学法浅析

案例教学法以其独特的魅力风靡世界,被认为是代表未来教育方向的成功教育模式,它有助于理论知识与实践能力的同步建构,有助于隐性知识的共享,有助于师生综合素质的提高.然而,我国案例教学实践的开展尚不尽如人意,如传统观念的制约,概念理解的偏颇,教学环节的缺失等,使得案例教学难以取得预期的成效.案例教学法的有效实施有赖于参与性教学理念的树立、教学案例的适当选择、课堂教学的组织与控制以及教师的课后反思.     

判例教学法对我国卫生法专业案例教学的启示

美国判例教学法为美国培养大批杰出法律职业人才。我国卫生法专业案例教学法存在该教学方法地位不高、案例教学流于形式、教学案例的来源较为混乱、教学机制不成熟等问题。我国应借鉴美国判例教学法的成功经验,应从以下四方面着手建设我国的案例教学法:在教材安排上,应组织编排高质量的案例教材,加强师资力量,合理安排教学过程,以培养学生的职业技能为主要目标。     

案例教学法在思想道德修养与法律基础中的运用研究

案例教学法体现了素质教育的宗旨,是一种行之有效的教学方法.文章分析了在思想道德修养与法律基础中运用案例教学法能收到良好效果,并且探讨了如何具体实施,从而达到培养和提高学生的创新能力和实践能力的目的.     

案例教学法在法学教学中的运用

案例教学法(CaseMethod)首创于19世纪70年代美国哈佛大学法学院,是当今广泛应用于法学、军事学、教育学、管理学等学科的重要教学方法.笔者结合多年法学教学中运用案例教学法的实践,系统地阐释了其在法学教学中运用的意义,提出了具体的运用模式并就应注意问题提出了个人见解.     

案例教学法与法学职业技能培养的实施路径与模式选择

案例教学法是对法学职业技能培养的一种有效途径,如何在教学中科学、有效地应用案例教学法是法学教育工作者一直以来孜孜以求的目标。虽然经过多年的积累已经形成了一定的案例教学的应用模式,但"教无定法",试图在案例教学法对法学职业技能培养的路径和模式选择方面有所突破和创新。     

案例教学在新能源专业研究生培养中的应用

案例教学法是将客观问题再现于课堂,再经学生分析和研究,最终提出解决方案,实现提高学生解决实际问题能力的一种特定教学方法。由于具有独特的教学效果而备受关注。结合太阳能利用技术课程案例教学在新能源工程类研究生拔尖创新人才培养中的应用与实施,探讨了将案例教学法贯穿于整个课程体系中的方法模式,详细介绍了案例教学法的基本原理、特点和具体应用。验证了案例教学法对于培养和提高学生独立解决问题能力和创新能力的必要性,研究表明,案例教学法在拔尖创新人才培养中具有很好的教学效果。     

论刑事案例教学法在高校本科教学中的运用

刑事法案例教学法是课堂理论教学的辅助性手段,与传统教学法相比,刑事法案例教学法在激发学生学习兴趣,增强学生分析、解决问题的实际能力以及提高学生沟通与合作的能力方面具有明显的优势。刑事法案例教学的组织可采用课堂讨论、观摩庭审、模拟法庭、法律诊所等形式。     

案例教学法在民族高校中应用现状调查研究——以四川民族学院政法系法学(藏汉双语)专业为例

四川民族学院政法系在全国率先开设了法学(藏汉双语)本科专业,为适应本专业教学要求,该系部不断实施探索案例教学法等实践性较强的教学方法。通过对四川民族学院政法系法学(藏汉双语)专业学生的问卷调查和走访,了解该专业案例教学法的实施现状,提出相关完善建议如下:选择案例是实施案例教学法的基础;在案例教学中应充分发挥学生的主体作用,提高其参与的积极性;采用多种形式开展案例教学,以期提高该专业案例教学法的实施效果。     

Europeanization and Institutional Change in Vocational Education and Training in Austria and Germany

This article analyzes how the EU's vocational education and training (VET) policy is reflected in domestic reforms in Germany and Austria. It perceives Europeanization as a heuristic concept to disentangle a twofold process of institutional change: The first process, the "Europeanized" arena of change, concerns change initiated by the reactions of domestic actors to EU initiatives; the second process of change—the "domestic" arena of change—concerns the ongoing incremental endogenous change in domestic institutions beneath and independent from the Europeanized arena of institutional change. This procedure allows us to differentiate between two modes of Europeanization: In Germany, Europeanization occurs as reform policies and politics; in Austria, Europeanization occurs more as institutional change by default, hence without strategically enacted reform initiatives shaped by the EU and as domestic institutional change that occurs anyway. The article combines the case-oriented method of difference with process tracing.     

Turnout determinants in democracies and in non-democracies

Elections are celebrated in democracies as well as in non-democracies. Studies on the factors explaining turnout normally focus, however, only on democracies. Are turnout patterns different in non-democracies? If so, how different are those? In this paper I address this issue with a unique dataset covering 1251 elections −678 democratic (in 107 countries) and 250 nondemocratic elections (in 81 countries) for the lower house and 209 democratic (in 57 countries) and 114 nondemocratic (in 60 countries)- for the period 1961–2008. I find that the turnout determinants are contingent upon the regimes and that the most important differences lay in the institutional and in the political factors.     

Concept and Politics in Derrida and Deleuze

Abstract

This paper points to significant similarities between the political orientations of Deleuze and Derrida. Derrida's appeal to a pure form of existing concepts (absolute hospitality, pure forgiveness, and so on) parallels Deleuze and Guattari's distinction between relative and absolute ‘deterritorialisation’. In each case, the absolute form of the concept is a condition of the possibility of change.     

Rhetoric and Action in Regulating the Public Schools in Norway and Sweden

In the past few decades, Norway and Sweden, like the rest of the Western world, have attempted to restructure and deregulate education. In both countries, the established governing models were threatened due to lack of legitimacy and efficiency. This article discusses the extent to which the different explanations of stability and institutional change address what happened when Management by Objectives and Results (MbOR) was introduced in Norway and Sweden. However, both the content and the course of change were different in the two countries. More specifically, one can talk about processes combining lock‐in mechanism and layering in the Norwegian course of development. In Sweden, the process of change was characterized by sudden and radical decisions. A decision made in 1991 could be explained as a state of punctuated equilibrium, as strong forces produced a situation where nothing else was to be done except make a radical change, turning the centralized system into a decentralized one. The period has parallels to the concept of ‘critical juncture’, representing a moment of openness to and possibility for different and new actors to influence a new constitution. In Norway, the transformation of policy tools for education purposes has thus far dominated the process and direction of change. In Sweden, through processes of conversion, the policy tool has gained a more dominating influence over education policy. Accordingly, there was a stronger emphasis on MbOR in its original version in Sweden than in Norway, which has transformed and defined the concept in line with educational purposes. This article outlines two cases of institutional change that combine elements of lock in with new developments. In neither Norway nor Sweden was the development pushed further in the same trajectory, rather it was transformed and, in the case of Sweden, radically changed within a larger nationally specific framework of sequence of events, values, norms and traditions of policy making.     

Structure and Process in Consociationalism and Federalism

It is relatively easy to characterize the institutional structureof a country as consociational or federal. The task is muchmore difficult if we turn from structure to the decision process.Within a given structure, there may be a great deal of variationwith regard to the decision process. Data for such variationare given for the decision process in Switzerland for whichthe following four types are distinguished: (1) consociationaland federal, (2) consociational and unitary, (3) competitiveand federal, and (4) competitive and unitary. Difficulties arediscussed in aggregating from such a variation to a measurefor the prevailing decision process in a country as a whole.It is suggested that the problem be disaggregated and that decisionprocesses be compared for particular issues. This can be doneboth across and within countries.     

我国规范性文件备案审查地方立法的若干缺陷及其完善

全国31个省级人民政府均已通过地方立法建立了规范性文件备案审查制度.这些立法存在诸多缺陷,必须进一步予以完善:一是缺乏完整、统一、合理的审查程序;二是备案审查程序缺乏刚性的期限规定或周期过长;三是审查标准不够完备、不便操作或过于简单;四是有关自行纠正建议和处理决定的规定不够具体、明确;五是未妥善处理好与行政复议一并审查制度以及地方各级人大常委会备案审查制度的衔接关系.