中国与东盟成员国刑事司法协助与引渡制度研究

中国与东盟成员国刑事司法协助与引渡制度是双边刑事司法合作中最重要的内容.近几年我国与东盟成员国刑事司法协助和引渡有很大发展,通过刑事司法协助与引渡条约的签署和适用,初步建立起刑事司法协助和打击犯罪合作机制.但存在和面临的问题是明显的,需采取适当的途径和措施,推动中国与东盟成员国刑事司法协助与引渡的完善.     

略论我国引渡制度的现实困局与应对出路

引渡作为一种国家间制裁国内涉外犯罪的司法合作制度,愈来愈受到各国政府和专家学者的重视。但引渡制度只是提供了一种形式上最有效的方式,跨国"避罪"问题并没有得到一劳永逸的解决,因为引渡本身就是一个世界性的难题,中国自不例外。其主要表现为,一是参加或签署的国际条约在引渡实践中存在局限性、签署的双边引渡条约存在缺陷、双边友好协商方式运作艰难。二是中国引渡制度实现中的政治、经济、人权、法律等阻碍因素。鉴于此,我国应从国际政治交往方面、处理引渡制度中的传统原则问题、处理与引渡有关的审判及程序上的问题等方面求得突破困境的应对之策。     

我国应对跨国腐败犯罪的问题与对策

<正>近年来,随着经济全球化的加强,腐败犯罪也出现了跨国化的发展趋势。腐败犯罪的跨国化不仅给我国国民经济造成巨大损失,而且为我国腐败犯罪的司法控制提出了严峻的考验和巨大的挑战。对我国而言,研究建立反腐败国际合作机制,是深入开展党风廉政建设和反腐败工作的新要求,是通过国际合作打击腐败犯罪的根本举措,也是构建我国惩治和预防腐败体系的一项基础性工程。尽管我国与许多国家签署了有关引渡、刑事司法     

我国主动引渡制度研究:经验、问题和对策

主动引渡作为国际刑事司法合作的一种机制,已成为我国打击严重犯罪、缉拿外逃罪犯的重要手段。虽然我国在建立和完善主动引渡制度上取得了一些成功的经验,但仍然面临缺乏从某些国家进行引渡的法律依据等一系列问题。我们应当针对存在的问题,从不断扩展我国与外国引渡合作的条约关系等五个方面寻求有效的解决途径,构建符合我国国情的主动引渡机制。     

中华人民共和国国际刑事司法协助法(立法建议稿)

起草说明:截至2007年8月31日,我国已经与57个国家缔结了90项包含司法合作内容的双边条约(协定),其中涉及刑事司法协助的条约40项,引渡条约31项,移管被判刑人条约5项。除此之外,我国还加入了《联合国打击跨国有组织犯罪公约》、《联合国反腐败公约》等大约20项包含刑事司法合作内容的多边国际公约。在我国,近些年来,借助国际合作处理的刑事案件呈快速增长的趋势,其中涉及不少大案要案;国际刑事司法协助在打击犯罪、维护人权和保障公正司法方面发挥着日益重要的作用。为了规范和便利国际刑事司法合作活动,仅仅依靠国际条约是不够的,还需要有调…     

试析中外双边引渡条约

试析中外双边引渡条约中山大学法律学系黄瑶引渡，即一国把在该国境内而被他国追捕，通缉或判刑的人，根据有关国家的请求移交给请求国审判或处罚。这是国际刑事司法协助中历史最悠久、最重要和当前各国之间最广泛存在的合作方式。引渡制度在国际上已成为打击国际犯罪和跨...     

引渡与国际法 ──兼论中国引渡法律制度

现代引渡规范的发展已经使引渡不再简单地只是一种政治交易的手段,而使其获得了国际司法合作的性质。现代引渡法律制度有国内立法和国际立法两个法律渊源,其主要内容包括：可引渡之罪的种类;引渡原则;引渡程序及对被请求引渡人的权利保障等内容。目前,我国政府正在积极地参与国际刑事司法合作,①实践中,引渡均依双边引渡条约而进行,而各条约间的规定又不尽相同,这样致使中国在引渡问题上缺少完整而统一的法律制度。现实中,我们的立法者做出一个明智的选择,即：在包括引渡在内的国际司法合作领域,用签订和加入国际条约的方式来补…     

王小洪出席第9届中国—东盟打击跨国犯罪部长级会议

公安部部长王小洪9月22日在京以视频形式出席第9届中国—东盟(10+1)打击跨国犯罪部长级会议并作主旨发言。王小洪表示,去年11月,习近平主席同东盟国家领导人共同出席中国—东盟建立对话关系30周年纪念峰会,为中国东盟关系发展作出战略指引,也为中国东盟执法合作发展指明了方向。《中国与东盟关于非传统安全领域合作联合宣言》发表20年以来。     

糯康案件所涉刑事管辖权暨国际刑事司法合作问题研究

国际社会所普遍关注的糯康案件所涉的刑事管辖权和国际刑事司法合作问题颇有研究价值。涉案四国都主张对本案有管辖权,而中国对本案行使管辖权合法合理且更有积极意义。在本案的侦破与抓捕过程中,多国间的司法合作举足轻重;根据《中老引渡条约》,糯康应当被老挝引渡至中国受审,且不适用政治犯不引渡及死刑犯不引渡原则;该案成功的国际司法合作实践有效地维护了中国的国家主权,并为中国与东盟间今后开展更广泛的司法合作开辟了道路。     

中国东盟自由贸易区刑事司法协助机制的完善

随着中国东盟经贸和交往关系的日益密切和便捷,跨国犯罪问题也日趋突出。区域内的刑事司法协助机制的建立具有必要性和迫切性。区域内的刑事司法协助机制应包括区域内国家之间的双边机制和区域集团的多边机制,在解决传统与非传统安全两个方面的问题上进行司法协助。     

The establishment and characteristics of China’s extradition system

Through analyzing the 25 bilateral extradition treaties that China concluded with other countries and the background of relevant legislation and treaty conclusion, the author delineates and discusses the establishment and basic characteristics of China’s extradition system. These characteristics are mainly as follows: (a) introduction of basic rules through bilateral treaties; (b) establishment of a scientific double examination to standardize and formalize extradition cooperation; (c) principle-centered, flexible and open towards extradition cooperation, and take the extradited person as a party to the extradition proceedings and give attention to the protection of his human rights.     

中国与东盟经济自由贸易区跨国经济犯罪及其控制策略研究

在中国与东盟经济自由贸易区的合作与发展不断深化和加强的进程中,制度的差异、发展的不平衡、特殊的地理环境等因素让竞争中出现了不法手段乃至犯罪手段,跨国经济犯罪即是其表现之一。跨国经济犯罪是跨国犯罪中最为常见且最为严峻的犯罪,是经济全球化最明显的负面影响。通过对跨国经济犯罪、中国与东盟成员国间跨国经济犯罪现状与原因的分析,进而探求中国与东盟成员国间控制跨国经济犯罪的有效策略。     

论跨境电子证据司法协助简易程序的构建

跨国网络犯罪的增加使得跨境电子取证的实际需求日益旺盛,我国在2018年颁布了《国际刑事司法协助法》,目的之一是加强国际合作打击跨国犯罪,为我国履行国际条约义务提供法律依据。但在司法实践中,我国的跨境电子取证面临着理论困境和实践困境。网络主权、司法管辖权理论使得单边取证存在着非法性可能。传统跨境电子取证因数据本地化存储和"倒U型"取证结构而效率不高。现有的国际司法协助程序繁杂、时间冗长,无法满足打击跨境犯罪和电子证据取证的现实需求。因此跨境电子取证的简易程序构建具有必要性和紧迫性,对现有司法协助程序进行适当简化,遵循合法性原则和效率性原则,构建境内外双方执法者直接合作方式合法化、派员调查取证方式、建立个案电子取证协助机制三种途径。     

Free trade agreements for the environment? Regional economic integration and environmental cooperation in East Asia

Traditionally, it has been argued that increased economic competition through free trade agreements would bring about environmental degradation. This study, however, argues that recent international free trade agreements have tended to enhance environmental cooperation among participating countries. This study has examined the process by which East Asian countries have developed mechanisms for the extant level of regional environmental cooperation, particularly highlighting the reasons for commonalities and differences in regional environmental cooperation between ASEAN and the dominant economies in the region. It finds that three factors particularly matter for developing regional environmental cooperative mechanisms: networks of intergovernmental organizations, the strong willingness of political leaders which is often embodied in national strategies for regionalism and the establishment, and the institutionalized linkage—particularly through FTAs—between trade and the environment. Tracing the process of policy evolution within three groups of countries sheds light on the political conditions under which the four entities involved (the ASEAN, Japan, China, and the Republic of Korea) have produced and strengthened cooperative environmental mechanisms among them along with free trade agreements. Focusing especially on the environmental policy changes in Japan, China, and the ROK associated with the creation of its FTAs with ASEAN, the study concludes that each of free trade agreements has incrementally developed environmental cooperation, especially when integrated into a vision for regional integration.     

不引渡问题与反恐

目前,国际法上的不引渡制度有两种相反的表现,一是死刑不引渡原则的兴起,另一个是政治犯不引渡原则的衰退。基于互惠原则,任何对别国的限制最终也是对自己的限制,若要使国际反恐合作顺畅有效,首先应该消除本国法律中的障碍。因此,应该适应这一国际法发展趋向,确立政治犯相对不引渡制度、死刑不引渡原则。     

Global Simplification of Extradition: Interviews with Selected Extradition Experts in New Zealand,Canada, the US and EU

This paper explores the discernible long-term trend towards the simplification of the conditions for extradition in the law of many states. The process of simplification appears to be justified by the necessity of taking more effective action against transnational crime. It appears to be taking place in three main areas: the recharacterisation of extradition from a criminal to an administrative process, the reduction of the substantive conditions for extradition and the expansion of the international platforms for extradition. The process is being tempered by and partially justified by greater individual human rights protections. In an effort to gain a better grasp of the nature of this process, what is driving it, and where it is heading, this paper records the views of a number of expert practitioners from the state, defence, and judiciary in seven different countries with significant extradition practice on these justifications, changes, and human rights protections. The paper synthesises their views thematically before drawing some conclusions about the nature of the process of simplification of extradition and whether there is an emerging global standard for extradition. The research was funded by the New Zealand Law Foundation International Research Fellowship for 2015.     

中国与东盟国家国际投资保护法律制度研究

在中国——东盟自由贸易区的框架下,中国与东盟国家间的相互投资规模日益增大。加强对国际直接投资的法律保护既是最终建成这一自由贸易区的重要条件,也是防范投资风险(主要是政治风险)的必要手段。因此,认识到该区域内国际投资保护制度的重要性,运用比较分析的方法找出现行保护机制的不足和缺失,从国内法和国际法两个层面提出完善中国与东盟国家间国际投资保护制度的建议将对完善与发展这一国际投资保护制度有所裨益。     

我国引渡外逃经济罪犯的法律障碍和对策——以赖昌星遣返为视角

2006年6月,赖昌星遣返再次遇阻,此案折射出我国引渡外逃经济罪犯存在三大主要法律障碍:引渡条约的缺位;死刑问题;司法公正问题。有鉴于此,我国应采取相应的法律对策:扩展与外国的双边引渡条约关系;废除经济犯罪适用死刑;加强司法改革,树立司法公正的国际形象。     

The role of human rights in extradition: the imperatives of reforming the Indian extradition law

The mobility of criminals and the consequent internationalization of crime have made domestic criminal law enforcement dependent upon international cooperation. As there is no general obligation of extradition at the international level, every country outlines the conditions and procedure, subject to which requests for extradition are granted. In fact, from the origin of the extradition system, objections stemming from human rights have been the major considerations in the grant or decline of extradition. It is in this background that the article examines and critically reviews the current level of the human rights protections afforded to persons facing extradition under the Indian Extradition Act, 1962. This article notes that in the field of extradition and human rights, several landmark legal developments have occurred in the last 50 years, and accordingly calls for a complete overhaul of the Indian extradition framework, so that India truly and effectively cooperates with other countries in criminal matters.