An Evaluation of Leadership as a Response to Agency Failure in the Public Sector

An alternative to contractual solutions to agency problems is suggested in the literature on leadership in which leaders are often claimed to be able to steer historical processes in the direction they intend through the distinctive influence they have on the intrinsic motivation of their followers. We evaluate Casson's (1991) agency–theoretic model of leadership as 'moral manipulation' which under certain conditions can be exercised at lower agency cost than monitoring. We then make a case for conceiving leadership as the development of culture of passion to advance the leader's quest through the engagement of followers in 'interaction rituals' in which their passion is either recharged or their lack of passion exposed. The impact the emergence of such cultures can have on the policy–making community is examined using the British and New Zealand experiences and a case is made for the preservation of a counter–culture of 'public interest' in the policy advisory ranks of the civil service.     

Gender Stereotypes and the Policy Priorities of Women in Congress

Political Behavior - Scholars find that women who run for Congress are just as likely to win as men are, yet women face considerable challenges related to their sex on the campaign trail. Women are...     

Preparing physicians to contend with the problem of dual loyalty

Abstract

Dual loyalty is defined as, particularly as it pertains to the field of medicine, a conflict or potential conflict between a healthcare professional's simultaneous obligations–expressed or implied–to a patient and to a third party. Dual loyalty situations often compromise physicians' ethical behavior, leading them to participate, either knowingly or unknowingly, in human rights violations perpetrated by a third party, often the state. Classic dual loyalty situations include the participation of physicians in state-sanctioned torture or the death penalty. However, there are a number of other dual loyalty scenarios that arise routinely in clinical practice in both closed institutions such as prisons, psychiatric facilities, and the military and in open societies promulgated by discriminatory practices, policies, and laws that can lead physicians and other health care professionals to contribute to the violation of individuals' human rights. Healthcare professionals are, for the most part, not formally trained to contend with these dual loyalty conflicts. While physicians routinely learn about bioethical frameworks to assist them in resolving difficult clinical dilemmas created, for example, by modern technology that extends life or by limited resources, few are taught a human rights framework that can assist them in protecting patients' human rights in cases of dual loyalty. This paper presents a case-based approach that utilizes a human rights framework for teaching dual loyalty in the undergraduate medical education curriculum. The medical profession is in dire need of training its workforce to grapple with the myriad dual loyalty issues that confront the profession today, and must institute curriculum reform to prepare future health care professionals to deal with dual loyalty scenarios that threaten individuals' human rights.     

The Legal Regulation of Non-stun Slaughter: Balancing Religious Freedom,Non-discrimination and Animal Welfare

Liverpool Law Review - In February 2019, The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) and the British Veterinary Association (BVA) published a joint open letter to...