“龙熊”共舞与经济转型——论影响中俄和平发展和互惠合作中的经济转型不彻底性

中俄的转型和发展需要中俄在世界经济舞台上实现”龙熊”共舞。深化经贸合作是两国实现崛起过程中的双赢选择。一个迅速工业化的中国需要稳定可靠的俄罗斯市场,一个日益强大的俄罗斯同样也需要参与中国这个世界上最庞大的潜在市场。在中俄两国几乎具备所有条件的情况下,经贸合作进展不尽人意的根本原因在于经济转型不彻底。然而,为实现共舞,当前两国应利用良好的政治关系,扩大深化经贸合作,完善经济转型。推动经济转型,完善市场建设,这不仅能消除影响双方经贸合作的基础性障碍,也是两国成功实现共同发展的必要步骤。     

儒家文化与经济发展关系的再审视

虽然传统儒学中包含着转化为有利于经济发展的作为新教伦理替代物的可能性因子,但是中国古代的制度安排显然阻碍了这种转化。而现代制度因素的引进和确立,在客观上割断了儒家文化与传统社会制度的亲和关系,不仅创造了一种排斥儒家文化中的不利因素而与有利因素相亲近的势态,而且也为儒家文化发生能够促进经济发展的创生性转换提供了契机。     

解读环境法的“立法悖论”——以经济利益与环境利益的冲突为视角

我国现行环境法未能妥当地处理经济发展与环境保护之间的矛盾,以至出现法律法规频频出台但破坏环境的违法行为却屡禁不止的“立法悖论”。本文对社会经济活动引发环境问题这一事实背后所牵涉到利益纠葛作进一步地剖析,试图对两种利益再作均衡,以寻求环境立法悖论的解决之策。     

图们江地区开发与吉林省经济发展

吉林省经济发展要以珲春——图们江地区开发为龙头,带动龙头与龙身的协调发展,发挥对外开放优势,实现跨越式发展。     

自主与不自足经济社会情境中的经济法定位:“社会性”的解读

经济法被界定为“社会法”,对于“社会性”的解读构成理性认知经济法内在规定性、明智设计经济法制度、进而合理型塑经济社会生活的纽结。由于“社会性”实现机制的构设实为个体、社会和国家间制衡格局的构建,自由主义和福利国家论两大理论范式对经济法产生了共识和分歧。在上述两种理论范式的智识洞见和理论缺陷的基础上,商谈论范式的相关立场和主张将有助于对经济法“社会性”定位的理论重解和制度重构。     

Government accountability and voting choice in Italy, 1990–2008

Between 1996 and 2008 Italy has experienced four government alternations in as many consecutive elections. It could be argued that after the dramatic party change that occurred in the early 90s the Italian system is in a state of constant flux and voters appear rather bewildered. This paper presents an opposite argument, showing that voters' choice reflects the greater importance of valence politics – performance, the economy – acting as a cue to voting behaviour, interacting with a long-term political predisposition. In turn, this promotes parties' responsiveness and accountability since the overall performance of a government – even of a coalition government – appears as a goal to be shared by all partners, under the threat of defeat for all. The analysis is carried out employing the Italian National Elections Studies series.     

Voting when the economy goes bad,everyone is in charge,and no one is to blame: The case of the 2009 German election

The economy was a major issue in Germany’s 2009 election. The global economic crisis did not spare Germany, whose economy is tightly integrated into the global economy. So when the German economy experienced a historical shock, did voters connect their views of the economy with their vote choice? Or did they, as some research has suggested, recognize Germany’s dependence on global markets and cut the government slack, especially when the government consists of the country’s two major parties? Using pre- and post-election panel surveys from the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES), we investigate the weight that voters gave to the economy, relative to other considerations, when casting their ballot and whether governing parties were disproportionately judged based on the state of the economy.     

Economic voting in a crisis: The Irish election of 2011

The paper explores a question raised by the 2011 Irish election, which saw an almost unprecedented decline in support for a major governing party after an economic collapse that necessitated an ECB/IMF ‘bailout’. This seems a classic case of ‘economic voting’ in which a government is punished for incompetent performance. How did the government lose this support: gradually, as successive economic indicators appeared negative, or dramatically, following major shocks? The evidence points to losses at two critical junctures. This is consistent with an interpretation of the link between economics and politics that allows for qualitative judgements by voters in assigning credit and blame for economic performance.     

中国经济学范式的反思与创新

中国传统经济学的"生产关系范式",不以生产方式为主要研究对象,脱离客观实际,陷入主观主义、形而上学和法学幻想;新时期的"生产关系+资源配置范式"存在严重的逻辑混乱和内在矛盾;现代中国经济学的"生产方式范式",应研究社会主义初级阶段生产方式以及与之相适应的生产关系和上层建筑的基本特征,以马克思主义经济学的科学世界观、方法论与基本原理为指导,吸收、借鉴西方经济学积极成果,坚持从实际出发,以中国问题为导向,形成中国风格和中国特色。     

论经济法的理论基础

任何法部门都要有理论基础。经济法理论基础应当以讲求法意理论、突出经济法特征和承认其他部门法理论基础为立论之本,并从经济法价值层面推衍出来。以往学界关于经济法理论基础的研究还没能够符合这些条件,故诸说成立的根据不充分;而民商法、行政法、社会法等理论基础对于从经济法价值层面推衍的"整体经济效益"的价值取向及覆盖的法内容,又无力支撑。于是,寻找经济法自身的根本理论支撑就十分关键了。笔者研究发现,经济法为了实现"整体经济效益"的价值取向,必须不断解决个体性经营无序带来的"整体"损害问题,于是,经济法配置的整体性经济权应当是限定个体性经营权的职权。笔者将这一理论称为"限权论"并定位为经济法理论基础。这一理论也是在与民商法的"保权论"、行政法的"控权论"、社会法的"扶权论"等理论基础的界分和协调中形成的。