试论亲子鉴定

什么是亲子鉴定?为什么需要做亲子鉴定?亲子鉴定提起的主体及几种情形,亲子鉴定的社会意义.亲子鉴定的是与非.由此而引起的争论.亲子鉴定在司法实践中作为证据使用时应该注意的问题.在社会转型时期人们信用的危机,婚姻家庭所面临的考验.     

DNA typing in populations of mule deer for forensic use in the Province of Alberta

The present study involves the development of forensic DNA typing tests and databases for mule deer in the Province of Alberta. Two multiplex PCR reactions interrogating 10 loci were used to analyze samples from three populations of mule deer. Additionally, an amelogenin based sex-typing marker was used to determine the gender of samples. Results show that the tests and databases are appropriate for use in forensic applications. Additionally, the results indicate that there is little population structure in mule deer in Alberta and that no changes to management of this game species are suggested.     

Technical note: Comparison of forensic swabs for intravaginal sampling

This study compared the currently used swab Prionics ForensiX Evidence Collection Kit with the alternatives Prionics ForensiX Evidence Collection Tube SafeDry and Sarstedt Forensic Swab XL. Volunteers provided intravaginal swabs collected with all swab types at specific time points after unprotected sexual intercourse. Quantifiable DNA, detectability of seminal fluid component (prostate specific antigen, PSA) and spermatozoa were evaluated to find the best-performing swab type.While Sarstedt XL showed significantly higher DNA quantities for sperm cell fractions than ForensiX Kit, the more concise PSA test results clearly favour ForensiX SafeDry. Reassuringly, mostly complete autosomal STR profiles of male components were obtained for sperm cell fractions at all time points and tested swabs. Switching to the higher performing ForensiX SafeDry with improved sampling and processing properties will also benefit victims, medical personnel, and investigators.     

Examination of pretreatment methods for DNA extraction from nails

In the conventional method of DNA extraction from nails, it takes approximately half a day to dissolve the nails. In this study, we examined whether using the HOrizontal Nail MAshing (HONMA) method, in which pressure is applied to the nail to crush it flat and increase its surface area, would improve DNA extraction efficiency. Fingernails (5 mg) provided by ten volunteers were used as samples. Nail pieces (1–3 pieces), shredded with nail clippers, were thinly stretched by applying 2 t of pressure to each piece using a hydraulic press. DNA was extracted by incubation at 56 °C for 10 min and 1 h during proteolysis. DNA yield from the nails pretreated using the HONMA method increased by 0.20–7.10 times compared with that from unprocessed nails. In particular, 10-min incubation using the HONMA method resulted in an average 2.05-fold increase in DNA yield compared with that under overnight incubation. However, the impact of using the HONMA method varied widely among individuals, and the amount of extracted DNA decreased in some cases, suggesting that the yield may differ depending on the nail quality.     

Automated DNA casework workflow: A retrospective study of the first implementation of FIDL at the Netherlands Forensic Institute

FIDL is a fast and automated DNA identification line which represents a series of software solutions automating the process from raw capillary electrophoresis data to reporting. This retrospective study provides insight in the numbers of cases, turnaround time, results compared to the standard workflow and the benefits automation has in a large volume workflow.     

"Biological identikit": Development of a SNPs-panel for the analysis of forensic DNA phenotyping and ancestry

Personal identification in mass disasters and in crimes is essential for humanitarian, ethical and legal reasons. In these contexts, when individuals cannot be identified by standard forensic DNA analysis, the Forensic DNA Phenotyping and the analysis of the biogeographical ancestry could help. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of a new panel of 891 SNPs in predicting phenotypic traits and biogeographical origin to create a “biological identikit”. In addition to fresh biological material, old evidence found at the crime scene or extracted and long-term stored DNA were tested with 41 SNPs for phenotyping and 850 SNPs for ancestry. All the SNPs were successfully incorporated into a single two-step multiplex PCR reaction using the IonAmpliSeq ™ Library Plus and applied for massive parallel sequencing with the Ion S5 platform using up to 0.05 ng/µL of DNA. The analysis of the results was carried out with an in-house predictive algorithm and consulting 20 population databases. By comparing the results obtained with identikit or video-photographic surveys, it was possible to predict phenotype and ancestry with an accuracy greater than 90%. While these new markers cannot identify a specific individual, they can be a valuable investigative tool.     

Comparison of operational DNA recovery methods: Swabs versus tapelifts

It is routine among many jurisdictions to recover DNA using tapelifts on porous substrates (e.g. clothing) and swabs on non-porous substrates (e.g. tool handles). Here, we examine this by comparing the efficiency of the NSW jurisdiction’s specific swabbing and tapelift techniques on a range of porous and non-porous substrates. To test DNA recovery efficiency, 30 μl aliquots of 1:50 and 1:100 saliva dilutions were deposited onto the substrates, left to dry overnight, recovered, extracted, quantified and a subset profiled. Tapelifts recovered more DNA and DNA profiles with more detectable alleles than swabs for both saliva dilutions on porous substrates. For non-porous substrates, similar DNA quantities and profiles were generally recovered with both methods for both saliva dilutions. These data underpin current practices to recover DNA using tapelifts for porous substrates and swabs for non-porous substrates. These data also revealed severe degradation of DNA recovered from brass, supporting the on-going need to improve DNA recovery and analysis methods for brass substrates.     

Test of chlorine wipes for efficient removal of DNA from forensic genetics laboratories

Sodium hypochlorite is an efficient reagent for removal of unwanted DNA from laboratory surfaces. Here, we tested two different chlorine wipes and compared their performance to a 0.9–1.8% hypochlorite solution. WipeClean Chlorine Disinfection wipes contain > 0.1 g sodium hypochlorite/kg, whereas WetWipe Chlorine Desinfection wipes contain > 1000 ppm active chlorine. Clean surfaces were contaminated with 10 µL 0.5 ng/µL of massively parallel sequencing libraries. The DNA was dried and left for 45 min before any treatment. The surfaces were cleaned using either 1) a 0.9–1.8% hypochlorite solution and clean wipes, 2) a WipeClean wipe, 3) a WetWipe, or 4) the surface was not cleaned. All experiments were repeated three times. Subsequently, the surfaces were swabbed using cotton swabs. DNA was extracted from the swabs and the DNA concentrations were determined in quadruplicates by real-time PCR. This protocol was repeated after the soft plastic wrapping around the wipes were left open or closed for several weeks. The results showed that the WipeClean wipes efficiently removed DNA for up to four weeks after the box with the wipes were opened, whereas the WetWipe wipes dried faster and gradually lost their cleaning effect.     

鞋内底不同部位接触DNA提取初探

目的探讨鞋内底不同部位接触DNA提取检出率。方法取100名20-30岁的志愿者，将其穿用过的运动鞋和皮鞋鞋垫设置成不同穿用时间组、不同材料鞋垫组、穿用后不同放置时间组，根据脚的形态学及运动力学特点，将鞋垫分成8个区域进行脱落细胞提取，并进行DNA进行检验。结果鞋垫上8个不同区域提取到的脱落细胞DNA分型检验效果不同。足弓外侧区（足引折弓除外）的接触DNA检出率最高；足弓内侧、第1趾骨区、第1跖骨区及足跟区次之；第2～5趾骨区、第2～3跖骨区、第4～5跖骨区不容易成功提取到接触DNA。结论鞋内底接触DNA检出率与接触时间、放置时间、鞋垫材质均相关，分区提取检验DNA更有针对性。     

DNA侦查技术的应用与前景

DNA侦查技术克服了以往遗传标记检测的种种缺陷以及指纹技术的一些局限 ,实现了物证检验从否定到认定的飞跃。目前DNA侦查技术正在走向更广阔、更深入的领域 ,出现了具有良好应用前景的一些新技术 ;许多国家均投资建立国家DNA犯罪数据库。我国的DNA犯罪数据库也在加紧建设中。从目前我国的有关情况看 ,建立DNA技术标准化和质量控制体系 ,已成为我国法庭科学亟待解决的问题。然而 ,DNA鉴定的不断完善 ,还有赖于人类基因组计划。