Why procedural justice in organizations?

This article reviews the existing research and theory on procedural justice and considers how it may be applied to the study of organizational behavior. It begins by distinguishing between the concepts of distributive justice and procedural justice and noting the historical contexts within which they emerged. Existing conceptual contributions and the research inspired by them are reviewed. The few existing studies applying procedural justice notions to organizational contexts are summarized, and the contributions of the articles to the present issue of this journal are reviewed relative to these efforts. The article closes by discussing the dual benefits of studying procedural justice in organizations: the enhanced understanding of the concept of justice and the behavior of people in organizations.     

类似“性变态”的流氓性犯罪1例

类似“性变态”的流氓性犯罪１例场涛，高保林（上海司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所；上海２０００６３）ＤＩＦＦＥＲＥＮＴＩＡＴＩＯＮＯＦＶＯＹＥＵＲＩＳＭＭＮＤＲＯＧＵＥＲＹＢＥＨＡＩＯＲ￥ＴａｎｇＴａｏ；ＧａｏＢａｏｌｉｎｇ（ＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＦｏｒ...     

对《刑法修正案（七）》第八条的理解与适用

《刑法修正案（七）》第八条将组织未成年人进行盗窃、诈骗、抢夺、敲诈勒索等违反治安管理活动的行为规定为犯罪,文章在罪名、客观行为方面以及此罪与彼罪的区分等问题上作了分析,以期更准确地理解和适用这一条款。     

THE INTERACTION OF ANTISOCIAL PROPENSITY AND LIFE‐COURSE VARYING PREDICTORS OF DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR: DIFFERENCES BY METHOD OF ESTIMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY*

Recent criminological research has explored the extent to which stable propensity and life‐course perspectives may be integrated to provide a more comprehensive explanation of variation in individual criminal offending. One line of these integrative efforts focuses on the ways that stable individual characteristics may interact with, or modify, the effects of life‐course varying social factors. Given their consistency with the long‐standing view that person–environment interactions contribute to variation in human social behavior, these theoretical integration attempts have great intuitive appeal. However, a review of past criminological research suggests that conceptual and empirical complexities have, so far, somewhat dampened the development of a coherent theoretical understanding of the nature of interaction effects between stable individual antisocial propensity and time‐varying social variables. In this study, we outline and empirically assess several of the sometimes conflicting hypotheses regarding the ways that antisocial propensity moderates the influence of time‐varying social factors on delinquent offending. Unlike some prior studies, however, we explicitly measure the interactive effects of stable antisocial propensity and time‐varying measures of selected social variables on changes in delinquent offending. In addition, drawing on recent research that suggests that the relative ubiquity of interaction effects in past studies may be partly from the poorly suited application of linear statistical models to delinquency data, we alternatively test our interaction hypotheses using least‐squares and tobit estimation frameworks. Our findings suggest that method of estimation matters, with interaction effects appearing readily in the former but not in the latter. The implications of these findings for future conceptual and empirical work on stable propensity/time‐varying social variable interaction effects are discussed.     

高校管理行为及其可诉性探讨

高校管理行为是高等院校在享有教育管理权利,履行教育管理义务时所实施的行为。近年来,有些高校在实施高校管理行为中侵犯其它法律主体合法权益的事情常有发生,加上我国现有的法律法规对该行为的法律性质规定不明确,由此,产生纠纷后,法律主体能否提起诉讼,如何提起诉讼等问题,没有法律依据。本文主要就有关高校管理行为的法律性质及可诉性问题进行探讨,并以求教于法学界同仁。     

论确定的一罪中的复合行为犯罪

根据犯罪客观方面所表现出的行为可以将确定的一罪分为单一行为犯罪和复合行为犯罪,根据复合行为犯罪的概念,可以归纳出复合行为犯罪的四个特征。以复合行为犯罪中两个以上行为的地位、相互关系和法律的规定为标准,可以将复合行为犯罪分为并列的复合行为犯罪、必要的复合行为犯罪和任意的复合行为犯罪三种情形。我们可以在概括提出并列复合行为犯罪和必要复合行为犯罪的定罪与处罚的一般原则后,来着重分析目前在认定任意复合行为犯罪未遂与既遂、中止和共同犯罪问题上的难点、分歧及矛盾,并在此基础上提出处理这些问题的原则和理由。     

我国物权法应采纳物权行为的独立性理论

我国物权法可以不采纳物权行为的无因性理论,但不应置物权合意的存在、物权行为的独立性于不顾;物权行为是一种客观存在,其成立与效力适用法律行为的一般规则,但有其自身特色;不能因为物权行为的有因无因而否认物权行为的独立存在。文章并且提出《物权法(草案)》修改的具体建议,在诸多观点上具有新意和可操作性。     

论劳动法上的雇主资格

在我国,劳动法上的“雇主”以“用人单位”代替且缺乏相应的雇主资格理论。若仅援用民法“法人”理论,则难以解释劳动法上雇主资格问题。本文认为,雇主资格的认定关键在于其权利能力和行为能力。通过对雇主与民事主体资格的比较分析,从实体和程序两个方面构建了雇主资格的认定体系。同时,对非法用工主体这一非常态的“雇主”也进行了相应探讨。     

Japanese Network Capital: The Impact of Social Networks on Japanese Political Participation

Recent scholarship shows that social capital has a large influence on political behavior. Social capital’s definition includes trust, norms of reciprocity, and social networks. Most studies, however, ignore the networking component. Here, we test the influence of social networks on political participation using new Japanese survey data. We separately test the effects of involvement in formally organized voluntary associations and informal social networks. We also examine whether hierarchical networks have a different impact on participation than equal relationships. To determine if networks with bridging or bonding social capital affect participation differently, we also measure the openness to outsiders of these networks. Negative binomial regression models indicate a strong positive relationship between formal and informal social networking—including network hierarchy and some forms of openness—and political participation.     

受贿罪客观方面比较研究——以“职务行为”、“受贿方式”为中心

“职务行为”、“受贿方式”是受贿罪客观方面的重要组成部分。职务行为从主体上看包括本人及他人的职务,从时间上看只指利用现时职务的便利,刑法应增设职前受贿罪和职后受贿罪;受贿方式包括收受、期约、索取等三种。