英语阅读理解教学中图示理论的创新性运用

本文论述了图示理论的起源、概念和分类。简要分析了当今大学英语阅读理解教学的现状以及探索图示理论在阅读教学的运用，最后结合教学实践提出一些启示和思考。     

中国学生英语写作中的叙事性话语

中国学生和英语母语作者在英语写作中对叙事性话语的使用表明，中国学生比母语作者更倾向于使用叙事性话语来说明事物。这种差异来自于母语迁移的作用，导致迁移的原因在于中国人习惯于领域依托式的思维方式，而英美人却习惯于领域无依托式的思维方式。     

试析法律解释与法律修辞的关系

法律解释与法律修辞表面是看似两种相互独立的法律方法,实际上二者却存在内在的关联,甚至相互交织、互不可缺.在某种意义上讲,法律修辞正是以法律解释为基础的,法律解释的一些具体方法同样要被适用在法律修辞的过程之中,这样在帮助法律修辞实现其说服目的的同时,也完成了法律解释自身的使命.     

法学语体研究——基于法学期刊编辑学的视角

经过20多年的发展,作为边缘法学的法律语言学的学科地位在事实上得以确立,法言法语渐被纳入学科研究对象。此外,作为现代语言学的分支,语体学已相对成熟,但法学语体问题却少有人问津。这也许与修辞学泰斗王德春教授主张语体种类之一的科学语体"不再细分"有关,也与自古以来"文术多门,各适所好"、"明者弗授,学者弗师"有关。然而,法学语体具有科学语体与政论语体甚至公文语体交叉的特点,可以视为语言分化的结果。法学语体研究滞后对我国法学研究与报刊编辑出版中的语言质量已造成消极影响。法学语体逐渐形成一些典型的语言手段及表达方式,如:词汇上庄重、严谨、文雅;句式完整,但具扩展性;语篇上具连贯性、充分性。我们应当恰当使用带语体色彩的词汇体现法学气派,并且合理使用长句、复合句反映法学风格。灵活运用的多种修辞表达方式充分体现了学术语境的科学理性与思维美感。法学语篇不妨在行文上流光溢彩,活泼多姿。与此同时,要防止不当话语修辞对交际和传播带来的负面影响。     

学报编辑稿件加工重在“三观”

学报编辑加工稿件，要具有写作学的视野。从古典文论及写作学中汲取营养，能使我们在阅读稿件时。不仅知其然，更知其所以然。从逻辑的角度言，重点要观其文题、整体架构和段落排布；从语法的角度言，不但要观其句子主干，更要留意其枝叶；从修辞的角度言，既要整体审视其是否“合体”，又要从细部斟酌其语词的运用，还要注意其表明观点和态度的语词。     

论《长生殿》中量词的修辞功能与表达效果

洪升的《长生殿》曲文之精美已达到令人叹为观止的高度，表现出洪升高超的语言驾驭能力。量词的运用在《长生殿》精湛的语言表达方面似乎是微不足道的一个方面，但除了表达量这一基本作用之外，其修辞方法运用的多样性和表达效果的丰富性，同样体现出作者曲文构思的精美和极高的美学追求；在主题的表达、写景状物、传情达意等方面也都发挥着独特的作用。     

论萧红小说的修辞特性

萧红是20世纪30年代一位独具风格的作家.在语言方面,她的小说很好地体现了"语言表达应配合一定的语境与情境",在不经意间展现出过人的叙事才能.她的语言存在是现代汉语语言运用的一个个案.她不期然达到的语言高度,是值得探究和借鉴的.     

穆时英小说的躯体修辞学

作家依据躯体修辞学建构的人物躯体形象,背后是特定的意义系统。穆时英小说前后期躯体形象具有不同特征:前期躯体形象体现的是传统历史叙事;后期躯体形象一方面展示出感官的放纵,另一方面呈现为精神的逃离。这种两难处境与西方现代人本主义哲学有很深关联,显示出作家文化选择上无法摆脱的精神困境。     

Does US presidential rhetoric affect asymmetric political violence?

Although political violence has proven to be difficult for governments to manage, predict or control, previous research on the impact of relevant federal government actions and US presidential rhetoric on terrorist attacks and hate crimes demonstrates that what the US government does matters in ways that are both expected and unexpected. In the US, government counterterrorism strategies changed rapidly in response to the September 11th, 2001 attacks on the US. The Bush administration formed a new executive department, centralised intelligence agencies, invested in tangible counterterrorism measures, implemented two invasions and occupations, and spoke publicly about terrorism on a near-daily basis. Yet much has changed since that research, as the US has since elected a president whose presidential campaign relied upon espousing antagonism towards Muslims, immigrants and other minority groups. Further, President Trump’s administration has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to isolate and suppress Muslims as a strategy to combat Islamist extremism in contrast to previous administrations’ more cooperative approaches. This article considers what existing research tells us about whether and how the different actions of the Trump administration may fuel both Jihadi and far-right extremism.     

Ideological congruence between party rhetoric and policy-making

Scholars, citizens and journalists alike question whether political parties keep their electoral promises. A growing body of literature provides empirical evidence that parties do indeed keep their electoral pledges. Yet little is known about the congruence between party rhetoric between elections and the policies delivered by them. Given the increasing influence of party rhetoric in the media with respect to voting decisions, it is highly relevant to understand if parties ‘walk like they talk’. The article suggests that due to electoral reasons parties face strong incentives to deliver policy outputs which are congruent to their daily rhetoric. Analysing data on 54 policy outputs on nuclear energy, drafted by 24 parties after the Fukushima accident, the analysis finds overwhelming evidence that parties deliver ideologically congruent policy outputs to their rhetoric (incongruent only in 7.89%). These findings have important implications for our understanding of the linkage between party communication and the masses in modern media democracies.