信息犯罪的刑法规制论

信息犯罪是信息社会的产物，由于我国侦查技术的局限和法律规定的滞后，信息犯罪并没有得到很好的制约。本文就研究信息犯罪的必要性、信息犯罪的防范应该主要依靠法律，还是依靠技术手段以及刑法在防治信息犯罪中的作用、相关立法的完善等问题进行了探讨。     

大学英语教学改革背景下的公安院校英语教学

公安院校英语教学是全国大学英语教学的一个组成部分。目前全国大学英语教学正处于新一轮的改革之中。置身于这样的改革潮流之中，我们有必要研究、了解并把握这场改革的实质精神，并以此为依据研究适合我国公安院校英语教学的途径。     

浅谈公安院校如何应对基础教育课程改革

基础教育的新课程改革引起了基础教育体系的历史性转换,为适应基础教育改革,很多高等院校相应地进行了一系列改革。公安院校也应积极关注基础教育课程改革,及时采取措施调整教育的模式和方向,改善公安教育现状。     

公安预警信息分析的基本理论和方法探讨

全国公安大练兵提出公安机关应有“提高驾驭复杂社会形势的能力,”因而,以情报信息指导警务工作,对信息进行专业、系统、有效的分析,即研究公安预警信息分析的内容、任务、步骤和分析方法已成为即时之需。采用关系图分析、预测分析、SWOT分析和利用预警指标模型分析等方法进行公安预警信息分析,可取得良好的成效。     

浅议基层保障问题对公安“打防”工作落实的影响

在目前公安实践中,公安基层现状和公安后勤保障存在一定问题,影响了公安"打防"工作正确落实.解决思路:加强基层公安机关,增加公安防范的投入;加强公安后勤保障,建立、完善公安经费保障机制.     

论客观公正原则

在国外,检察官的客观公正义务是以实体真实主义和职权主义为基本原理的德国法学的产物。其起源于19世纪后期德国的刑事诉讼法,随后在欧洲大陆和亚洲一些大陆法系国家的法律中也得到了体现。客观公正原则实质上是客观性原则和公正原则的结合,因而具有两个方面的基本内容。在当代中国,客观公正原则的法理基础和法律依据则主要有四个方面。     

Security in the name of human rights: the discursive legitimation strategies of the war on terror in France

This article aims to question the discourse on “the war on terror” developed by the French President in the wake of the two terrorist attacks that occurred in France in 2015. Drawing from critical discourse analysis, it explores the discursive legitimation strategies deployed by President Hollande to legitimate France’s securitarian response to the two attacks. It reveals how the defence of human rights served as an overall justificatory framework, through rationalisation, appeals to authority, and moralisation. It argues that Hollande implemented a discursive manipulation of reality to shield his actions from criticisms of illiberalism, all the while reframing the notion of human rights, undermining it and paving the way for an authoritarian-driven executive.     

论农村社会保障法律制度构建中的政府责任——基于社会法视阈

农村社会保障法律关系错综复杂,政府、社会及农民在农村社会保障中既有相应的权力(利),也要履行一定的义务。行政法、经济法和社会法各自具有独特的法律价值和调整对象,本文分别基于这三个法域检视农村社会保障法律制度构建中的政府责任,考察农村社会保障法律制度构建中政府责任的越位和缺位,反思政府在构建农村社会保障法律制度中所发挥的主导和基础作用,提出在社会法视阈下政府应定位在承担法律制度构建、财政支撑和监督管理之责任。     

To revise or not to revise: the ‘peace constitution’, pro-revision movement,and Japan's national identity

Why do conservative nationalists in Japan continuously seek to revise the constitution despite the past failures, and what is the likelihood of successful revision and its impact on Japan's norm of pacifism and its use of force? The article offers an analytical framework for the issue based on national pride and national security, and argues that the ‘revisionists’ seek to create a new national identity, one that infuses a greater sense of national pride among the public and enables the exercise of collective self-defense, thereby removing Japan's postwar psychological and institutional limitations on nationalism and military activities. The LDP's 2012 draft is most explicit and ambitious in this regard, with the current revision attempt under Abe having the highest chance of success since the 1950s. Successful revision would significantly expand Japan's security activities, particularly within the framework of the US–Japan Security Alliance, and entail the end of Japan's unique postwar institutionalized pacifism, although the norm of pacifism will linger on as a constitutional principle. For a smoother return to the international military scene, the Japanese government must distance itself from historical revisionism and utilize its enhanced military role to promote regional public goods rather than merely protecting its narrow national interests.