国家监察委员会的监察法规制定权限:三步确界与修法方略

全国人大常委会通过决定方式授予国家监察委员会监察法规制定权,形成了以人大立法权为核心且以行政立法权、监察立法权和军事立法权为补充的更优的“一元三系”立法分工体系,监察权也得到了极大丰富,进而有利于织密权力监督之网。当前的紧要任务在于明确界定监察法规制定权限,以在推进监察法律规范体系立体建设的同时保障监察法规制定权规范演进。利用“三维考察+三层掘进”的阐释模型耙梳可以发现,目前国家监察委员会既可以为执行监察法律、监察直接相关法和间接相关法的规定,单独或者联合其他国家机关进行执行性立法,也可以在遵守法律保留原则的前提下,就领导性管理事项进行创制性立法,还可以基于全国人大常委会的专门授权,就法律的相对保留事项和监督性管理事项进行授权性立法。接下来应当在《全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于国家监察委员会制定监察法规的决定》的基础上对制定监察法规的立法权限、形式和备审等内容作进一步规范,以备我国《立法法》修改之需。     

MAKING WAR CRIMINAL

Turk's conflict theory of political criminality is used to account for the virtual cessation of international criminal law enforcement following the Nuremberg Tribunal and its revival through the establishment of The Hague Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Turk's theory further helps to contextualize the little known contribution of Sheldon Glueck to the development of the Nuremberg Trials. Glueck helped overcome Soviet wishes to turn Nuremberg into a show trial and developed the organizational plan for the visual and witness evidence of the Holocaust that led to the most important convictions for crimes against humanity in the Nuremberg Trials. The contributions of Glueck and Turk provide an underappreciated foundation for the criminological study of war crimes and crimes against humanity.     

着力解决发扬民主不够、正确集中也不够的问题

民主集中制是马克思主义政党的根本组织制度和领导制度。充分发扬民主，坚决贯彻执行民主集中制，是中国共产党不断发展壮大，中国革命、建设和改革取得胜利的成功经验，也是各级领导班子有效运行、做好各项工作的组织和制度保障。要着力解决发扬民主不够、正确集中也不够的问题，必须全面、认真贯彻民主集中制。要充分尊重领导班子每个成员的民主权利，合理规范一把手的领导权力，完善集体决策机制，确保实行民主决策。同时，要强化集中意识，加大执行力度，排除正确集中的障碍，严明政治纪律和规矩。一把手是关键，要率先垂范，认真执行民主集中制，牢固树立民主观念，始终坚持民主作风，不断提高驾驭正确集中的领导艺术，亲自抓决策的执行。     

多元竞争环境下的马来西亚政治生态

本文旨在分析马来西亚近期政治生态中的若干重要变化,并对竞争环境下马来西亚政治行为体的行为规律进行探讨。本文认为,马来西亚的政治生态正处在从威权政治向多元竞争型政治的快速转变过程中,政治上的生存—发展策略主要是绩效竞争、政治结盟、话语动员。     

The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors’ liability verdicts

Participants in two experiments acted as jurors for a personal-injury case containing different types of expert testimony. In both experiments, the defendant was more likely to obtain a verdict in his favor when his expert presented anecdotal case histories than when the expert presented experimental data. Participants’ liability judgments were correlated with their perceptions of the experts’ credibility (experiments 1 and 2) and were moderated somewhat by their need for cognition and preference for numerical information (experiment 2). The results are discussed in terms of reasoning heuristics such as the base-rate fallacy.     

政务公开难点问题及发展趋势探析

政务公开是塑造服务型政府最为基础性的工作。当前,中国政务公开工作有了较大的进展,但总体上良莠不齐,一些地方和部门的政务公开存在的难点问题还较多。深化政务公开,作为促进行政管理体制改革的重要举措,是发挥政务信息促进经济发展提高社会效益的有效方式,政务公开将逐渐呈现＂六大发展趋向＂。     

公共政策制定的影响因素分析——以“孙志刚事件”为例

公共政策制定是公共政策过程的第一阶段,包括政策议程、方案规划、政策合法化等几个环节。民意和专家的参与、以及媒体的作用是公共政策制定过程中不可忽视的影响因素,对于推进公共政策制定的民主化、科学化有着重要的意义。孙志刚事件作为一个典型的引起公共政策修改制定的案例,对公共政策的制定有着重要的分析价值。     

试论仲裁裁决书的制作

裁决书的制作是仲裁活动中最为重要的内容,本文在分析裁决书价值的基础上,剖析了目前裁决书制作存在的问题,并探讨了如何改进裁决书的制作,以提高裁决书的制作水平。     

公司转投资、保证、借贷、捐赠规则

公司转投资、保证、借贷与捐赠行为 ,为传统公司资本维持原则之下的子规则。这四项子规则的共性在于 :行为本身均隐含着直接或间接的公司资产减损或资产丧失的风险 ,从而有损公司股东或债权人的利益。应当审慎地考察此四种子规则的利弊得失 ,使我国的相关立法更臻科学     

A Systematic Approach to Domestic Abuse–Informed Child Custody Decision Making in Family Law Cases

This article introduces an approach to domestic violence–informed decision making developed under the auspices of the National Child Custody Differentiation Project, a cooperative undertaking among the Battered Women's Justice Project, the Association of Family & Conciliation Courts, the National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges, Praxis International, and the U.S. Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women. This approach has four essential elements: (1) identifying domestic abuse; (2) understanding the nature and context of domestic abuse; (3) determining the implications of abuse; and (4) accounting for the nature, context, and implications of abuse in all custody‐related recommendations and decisions.

Key Points for the Family Court Community:
• Applying a systematic approach to domestic violence can help practitioners identify, understand, and account for abuse in family law cases.
• The approach recommended here is suitable for use by anyone who is involved in a contested child custody case at any stage of the proceeding.
• The specific application of the recommended approach will vary depending upon the practitioner's role and function in the case, relationship to the parties, and access to information, as well as the nature of the proceeding and the issues to be decided.