论商事账簿的制作、保管义务及证据效力

商事账簿是商事实践的产物，随着商业的拓展，商事账簿的制作、保管日益受到重视，各国逐渐对商事账簿的制作、保管义务及证据效力给予立法规制。本文以我国的立法现状为视角，重点剖析了我国对此问题的立法缺陷，进而结合国外的有益经验，在即将制定的《商事通则》中应如何对商事账簿的制作、保管义务进行立法规制及其证据效力应如何认定提出一些立法建议。     

浅谈Microsoft office powerpoint在现场照片制卷中的应用

运用Microsoft office powerpoint处理软件为平台,以GA/T现场照相、录像规则和GA/T现场照相制卷质量要求为依据,发挥现代科技与数码技术的优势,可以制作出全面、客观、规范、直观的现场照片案卷。     

浅析信息公开条件下工作秘密的法律保护

工作秘密是指有关国家机关在其公务活动和内部管理中产生的不属于国家秘密而又不宜对外公开的事项。它与国家秘密、商业秘密、个人隐私的概念是有所不同的。尽管我国现有法律法规对工作秘密进行了规定,但现已颁布实施的《政府信息公开条例》却没有将工作秘密纳入信息公开保护的范围内,从而给工作秘密的保护带来诸多难题。我们要大胆借鉴国外法律对工作秘密实施保护的成功经验,加紧修订我国与工作秘密有关的法律法规,将工作秘密纳入信息保护范围内,提高社会公众的信息公开获取能力,确保各级政府机关依法工作的顺利开展。     

Reforming Relocation Law: A Reply to Prof. Thompson

This article provides a response to Prof. Thomson's critique, noting many points of agreement and also the broader consensus that is emerging among experts in the field. The research evidence, and the wider body of knowledge on children's well‐being generally, supports the proposition that relocation is a risk factor for children after parental separation but provides no support for a general presumption either in favor of, nor against, relocation. Nor should it be assumed that the interests of children are the same as those of their primary caregiver. We defend our three questions arguing the need in an adult‐centric debate to focus resolutely on children's interests rather than on adult rights. Both Prof. Thompson's approach and our own involve guided decision making with the child's best interests as the paramount consideration—his through weak presumptions based upon research about how judges respond to relocation issues and ours through focused questions based on research on how parents and children respond to relocations issues. We do not consider that codifying the existing practices of the courts represents real reform. We identify various risks involved in using presumptions, but note that, in jurisdictions with limited publicly funded resources for individual case assessment, presumptions, burdens or guidelines may be needed to offer rough justice to impecunious parents.

Key Points for the Family Court Community
• Notes points of emerging agreement on relocation within the research community
• Explores the differences between the use of presumptions and focused questions and highlights the role of empirical research of the lived experience of children and families postrelocation disputes
• Identifies how the level of public resourcing for the family law system may impact upon decisions about the substance of the law concerning relocation