邓小平的价值主体和价值评价思想论析

邓小平的价值思想内容十分丰富,是一个较完整的理论体系。邓小平的价值观是以人民为价值主体和评价主体的价值观。以人民群众为价值主体,是由我党的性质、根本宗旨以及人民群众在历史上的作用决定的。以人民群众为价值主体,必然要求以人民群众为评价主体,以人民群众的利益为评价标准。“三个有利于”价值标准,是以人民为价值主体和评价主体的价值标准,是以最广大人民群众的根本利益为评价标准的价值标准,也是科学的价值标准。     

On the Robustness and Validity of Groups

In response to Nagin's comment on our paper, Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal Trajectories, we reconsider the robustness and validity of group-based approaches to criminal trajectories and introduce additional issues for future research. We emphasize the limitations of typological approaches and the dangers of reifying the idea of distinct offender groupings for research and policy. We also clarify misunderstandings about the use of hierarchical linear models for studying trajectories of crime. Our basic conclusion is that methods in criminology need to be more tightly linked with theory.     

论医患纠纷损害赔偿范围的确定--对《医疗事故处理条例》第49条的质疑

<医疗事故处理条例>与民事法律原则以及审判实践的冲突,造成当前患者获得司法救济的困难,同时法官在审判中遭遇诸多难题.本文通过解释医疗损害方面的概念,引用最新的案例,对国内相关法律的比较分析,以及论述鉴定对裁判的不当影响,从几个角度对"不属于医疗事故不赔偿"观点进行否定.并针对医学会鉴定的缺陷,提出法官审理案件中3种可行的方法限制鉴定机构的权限;事故鉴定结论仅为证据;司法鉴定、医学会鉴定、法官共同判断侵权事实.     

对公安考核激励机制的几点思考

文章对公安队伍管理长效机制建设过程中如何有效建立考核激励机制,进行了深入的探索。从体现江泽民同志在"7·1"讲话中提出的"尊重人、理解人、发展人"的思想高度出发,运用现代管理的科学理念,提出了管理的目的,不是管死管住,而是激励激活的观点。并对考核激励机制应着力解决的问题,应注意把握的原则,进行了分析和研究。     

Community Penalties in the United States

The author discusses some background matters concerning the US criminal justice systems that may provide useful context for non-US readers, and summarises the main general conclusions about the operation of community penalties from two decades' research. He also briefly summarises research concerning each of the major penalties that have been attempted. Why American jurisdictions have been comparatively unsuccessful at use of community penalties as alternatives to incarceration and whether that lack of receptivity can be changed is discussed in the conclusion.     

An Evaluation of the Use of Videotaped Evidence for Juvenile Witnesses in Criminal Courts in England and Wales

For the first time, the UK Criminal Justice Act (1991) allowed the videotaped evidence of a child to be substituted for the child's evidence-in-chief in a criminal court. The present study is an evaluation of that legislation. One hundred and fifty children were observed testifying in a criminal court in the UK. The use of the videotaped evidence and subsequent cross-examination of the child witness (usually via the closed circuit television system) was also observed. The data base from the Lord Chancellor's Department of all trials involving child witnesses in England and Wales was also analysed. The results showed that the introduction of the video technology into the criminal courts reduced the levels of stress of child witnesses but did not increase the conviction rates.     

Public Service Motivation,Organizational Social Capital,and Knowledge Sharing in the Korean Public Sector

This article investigates whether public service motivation (PSM) and organizational social capital predict knowledge sharing in the public sector. The hypothesized relationships in the proposed model are verified with the online survey data of 506 public employees in Korea. The test results show that the two dimensions of PSM (attraction to public service and commitment to public values) and the trust component of organizational social capital are both positively related to knowledge sharing in the Korean public sector, and that the associability component of organizational social capital is indirectly associated with knowledge sharing through its influence on PSM. The article discusses the ways that PSM and organizational social capital may contribute to overcome the social dilemma of knowledge sharing in public organizations. It also suggests that there is need for further research on the individual dimensions of the PSM construct.     

犯罪的严重性：概念与评价

犯罪的严重性是犯罪的客观危害与主观恶性的统一,它构成决定刑罚的分配的重要基准.对犯罪的严重性的评价应该以体现犯罪的客观危害与主观恶性的所有因素为标准.对犯罪的客观危害的评价应该考虑犯罪所侵害的权益的意义、犯罪的危险的大小、所造成的实际损害的轻重、犯罪的对象、时间、地点与实施程度;对犯罪的主观恶性的评价应该考虑犯罪的罪过形式、犯罪的动机与目的、认识的内容、犯罪的起因、犯罪人的生理与精神状况、犯罪人的身份以及犯罪人在犯罪中的表现.鉴于作为犯罪的严重性的组成部分的客观危害与主观恶性构成既统一又对立的关系,对犯罪的严重性的统一评价应该相应地遵循对立统一律.     

精品课程建设中本科课堂教学应处理好的几个基本关系

诉讼法精品课程建设,应当高度重视本科课堂教学。只有着力处理好授课内容与教材的关系、系统讲授与突出重点的关系、内容的知识性与趣味性的关系、阐释法学理论与联系司法实际的关系、传授知识与培养能力的关系、教师的主导作用与学生的能动作用的关系,才能够真正提高本科课堂教学效果。     

民事裁判中事实认定的对象

民事裁判中事实认定对象的准确确定 ,是作为裁判基础的事实得以正确、及时认定的前提。但由于受事实与评价、案件性质等因素之影响 ,使得事实认定对象的准确确定十分复杂。本文在深入地理论分析和实证考察的基础上 ,明确提出了以当事人就事实问题存在的实质性争议焦点为事实认定对象的观点 ,并尝试性地探讨及时、准确地认定对象的方法。