“痕迹主义”的衍生逻辑及治理路径——基于政府绩效管理视角分析

“痕迹主义”是痕迹管理的异化衍生,是以痕迹代替政绩,过于看重留痕而不注重实际效果的一种工作作风,其本质是形式主义和官僚主义的新型表现形式。缺乏系统科学的绩效目标、绩效考核指标设计不科学、绩效任务执行过于频繁化、绩效考核方式缺乏差异性、绩效考核结果运用不当,共同促成了“痕迹主义”的产生。结合绩效管理理论,应从绩效目标设置...     

防范和化解地方政府隐性债务风险研究——基于地方国有平台型公司转型发展视角

金融风险防控是中国经济社会发展的重要攻坚战之一。分析地方政府隐性债务成因、风险成因和风险传导机制等可以发现,地方政府偿债能力增长率高于债务规模增长率,是阻断地方政府隐性债务风险出现、传导和爆发的理论逻辑。解决债务风险问题的关键在于,以提高政府投资效率和债务人偿债能力为出发点,增强地方国有平台型公司盈利能力。科学推进地方...     

法律职业人才培养——从比较法研究的视角

特定的法律人才培养模式,不仅决定了一个国家法律人才的素质,更对国家的司法体系,法的生产方式及其发展,法的运行模式等等产生深远的影响。处于社会变革时期的发展中国家,选择一种适合本国国情的法律人才培养模式,会对国家法制建设和社会变迁起到积极作用。我国法律人才培养存在定位不清,课程设置不合理,没有形成办学特色等问题。通过比较法研究,寻求相应的改革路径。     

朱元璋的制度反腐及其教训

鉴于元朝灭亡的教训,朱元璋力图从制度上预防与惩治贪污腐败。他制定低俸禄与低办公经费制度强迫官员保持节俭的作风,以严酷的法律惩治贪污腐败,并建立了一个完善的监察系统搜集官员腐败的证据。朱元璋的制度建设虽然对遏制贪污腐败起到了一定震慑作用,但即使是在朱元璋时代,贪污行为也屡发不绝。朱元璋过世后,低俸禄与低办公经费成为官员贪腐的正当理由,严酷的反贪法律的执行因为完全取决于皇帝的态度实际上也逐渐废止了,监察制度也变成了党争的工具。尽管如此,朱元璋的制度反腐仍然为今天的廉政建设提供了可资借鉴的经验与教训:反腐教育应当常抓不懈,反腐应摆脱依赖个人意志的法律,注意保持官员的适当工资水平。     

The reform-security dilemma in democratic transitions: the Turkish experience as model?

In considering the future of budding Middle Eastern democracies, past experience and scholarship show that a possible outcome for even the most “successful” ones is some form of imperfect democracy. Based within the literature on democratic transitions and hybrid regimes, this article explores possible factors leading to such outcomes. It focuses in particular on reform/security dilemmas, and the resulting evolution of dual state structures, in which an unelected and often authoritarian state establishment coexists with democratic institutions and practices, for example, in countries like Russia, Iran, or Pakistan. Much of the literature views such duality as an impasse, and thus considers these countries as trapped within this “hybridness” – discouraging news both for currently defined “hybrid regimes” and for countries like Egypt and Tunisia, which are now launching democratization processes. To better understand the nature and evolution of such regimes, this article looks at the case of Turkey, first tracing the rise and consolidation of the Turkish inner state, generally equated with the Turkish armed forces. It then looks at the apparent diminishing and integration of the inner state through pacts and coalitions among both civilian and military elements, and calls into question whether the pessimistic view of permanent illiberalness is inevitable.