共同非法占有公共财产犯罪的定性辨析

具有不同主体身份的共同犯罪人非法占有公共财产,如何定性处罚,刑法学界长期以来对此问题争论不休,存在分别定罪说、主犯决定说、实行犯决定说、贪污共犯特别规定说及区别对待说等诸多理论观点,至今难有定论。实务部门可遵循的立法和司法解释又存在适用上的歧义。为此,应当以部分犯罪共同说为理论基础,针对不同主体身份的共同犯罪人非法占有公共财产的犯罪定性,确立一个明确而又易于实践操作的判定依据。     

“红头文件”违法之原因及对策论析

违法“红头文件”常以法律之名行干扰法律实施之实,已成为影响法制统一的一大隐患。违法“红头文件”泛滥主要是人治思想的体现,监督机关预防和纠正不力、行政复议范围的狭窄以及司法上无救济途径等诸多原因,使行政相对人面对违法“红头文件”的侵害有苦难言,在一定程度上又放纵了“红头文件”对法律的恣意冲突。本文试通过对“红头文件”违法原因的分析,找出相关法律对策,以期能对这一抽象行政行为走出困境有所助益。     

文档数字化系统--构筑信息化大厦的基石

文档数字化系统，就是将传统的纸张文档通过纸张扫描、图文优化、信息内容提取、编目归档等数字化技术加工成电子化的信息数据，将数字文档进行高质量保存和管理，实施知识增值，并提供网络高速存取服务。文档数字化系统功能完整，能够满足纸质文档批量式输入、加工、编目、有机共事等多方面需求，对高等学校信息资源数字化建设具有广泛意义。     

论拒绝强迫自证其罪规则——以此为突破口设置我国沉默权制度

沉默权制度一直是我国刑事诉讼领域炙手可热的话题,然而当前是否已经具备了引进沉默权的条件,在我国目前的“本土”环境下其能否有效运行,还需进行辩证的分析。如沉默权所要求的制度条件,沉默权的引进应该暂缓,沉默权与拒绝自证其罪的关系。同时提出了以拒绝自证其罪的角度设置我国的沉默权制度。     

Color separation in forensic image processing

In forensic image processing, it is often important to be able to separate a feature from an interfering background or foreground, or to demonstrate colors within an image to be different from each other. In this study, a color deconvolution algorithm that could accomplish this task is described, and it is applied to color separation problems in document and fingerprint examination. Subtle color differences (sometimes invisible to the naked eye) are found to be sufficient, which is demonstrated successfully for several cases where color differences were shown to exist, or where colors were removed from the foreground or background. The software is available for free in the form of an Adobe Photoshop-compatible plug-in.     

A simple microthermal desorption device

A new method for thermal desorption of small samples is presented. The method uses a solid phase microextraction (SPME) holder with the fiber removed. The sample-for example, an ink sample on paper-is simply placed inside the needle of the holder, where normally an SPME fiber is positioned. The thermal desorption is then performed on any kind of gas chromatograph in a manner similar to that for SPME analysis. The needle of the SPME holder penetrates the injector septum; the temperature of the thermal desorption is simply the temperature of the injector. No solvents or liquid nitrogen cooling are used. The paper sample is kept inside the holder needle during the analysis. After the analysis is completed, the sample is removed from the needle by pushing forward the steel wire inside the needle in the way normally used to perform sampling with the SPME fiber. The desorbed compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector or by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The optimum temperature for desorption of ink samples on paper was 200 degrees C. The influence of the paper matrix is negligible at that temperature. Laboratories lacking the commercial device for thermal desorption can use this cheap device for the analysis of, for example, writing ink, printing ink, and inkjet ink samples on paper. Other types of samples can be investigated but the size of samples suitable for analysis is limited.     

论劳动法上的雇主资格

在我国,劳动法上的“雇主”以“用人单位”代替且缺乏相应的雇主资格理论。若仅援用民法“法人”理论,则难以解释劳动法上雇主资格问题。本文认为,雇主资格的认定关键在于其权利能力和行为能力。通过对雇主与民事主体资格的比较分析,从实体和程序两个方面构建了雇主资格的认定体系。同时,对非法用工主体这一非常态的“雇主”也进行了相应探讨。     

集资诈骗罪非法占有目的认定问题研究——以浙江温州吴英案为视角

集资诈骗罪主观构成条件必须具有＂以非法占有为目的＂,但相关司法解释中推定依据存在不足。吴英的行为不属于＂明知没有归还能力而大量骗取资金＂或＂肆意挥霍骗取资金＂的情形,不能认定具有非法占有目的。司法实践中,推定＂以非法占有为目的＂,应把是否存在逃避返还资金的行为作为推定的前置条件,还要综合考虑行为人的资金用途、集资方法。     

论侵害人格权之获益返还——兼论《侵权责任法》第20条的适用

侵害他人人格权获得利润,本为现今之普遍现象。但是如何处置此种不当获益,乃民法上之重大课题。我国《侵权责任法》第20条对此设有较为周全之规定,但未言明该请求权之性质,对其适用恐嫌不妥。因此,以批判的观点检讨现行立法及学说的规定,认为其实质上是不法管理制度,并认为其适用范围仅限于人格权受侵害之财产损失,不及于精神损害。同时明确其构成要件和法律效果,明确其与侵权损害赔偿请求权及权益侵害不当得利请求权的关系,至为关键。