沉默权的类型化研究

尽管国内学者对沉默权问题进行了深入的研究,但主要是从内涵挖掘历史演变的角度出发,缺少从外延方面的类型化探索。沉默权从不同标准出发主要可以分为绝对的沉默权和相对的沉默权、行为意义上的沉默权和结果意义上的沉默权、明示的沉默权和默示的沉默权、显性的沉默权和隐性的沉默权以及审讯沉默权和审判沉默权。我国事实上已经确立了结果意义上的、默示的、隐性的、相对的沉默权制度,在现阶段没有必要引进行为意义上的、明示的、显性的审讯沉默权制度。     

行为犯可以构成结果加重犯

承认行为犯可以构成结果加重犯,是行为犯发生现实危害结果时的必然归宿,是我国刑事立法实践的初步概括,也是罪责刑相适应原则的内在要求。     

论犯罪分子实施犯罪后的反常行为与侦查破案

犯罪分子在实施了犯罪行为后,往往会出现各种各样的反常,这主要是由人的心理因素所决定的。犯罪后的紧张心理是造成反常的主要因素。同时,反常也受到犯罪人的个性特点、个人交往以及案件情况、侦查活动等因素的制约和影响。在侦查中,要注意反常的各种行为表现和假象反常,分析反常产生的原因,为侦查提供线索,以发现嫌疑对象。     

实然与应然——法律伦理之可能

法律伦理及法律伦理学是否可能取决于从法律伦理行为事实能否推导出法律伦理行为应该。然而,单纯从行为事实是推不出行为应该的,只有通过法律目的判断以及法律伦理行为事实和法律目的之关系判断才能从法律伦理行为事实如何推导出法律伦理行为应该如何。法律伦理行为之应该经由人们的实践活动可以变为现实,其具体保障在于法律伦理良心、法律伦理名誉及底线法律伦理的法律化。     

应理性看待服刑人员的结婚行为

服刑人员虽然被判处刑罚,但结婚权属于未被剥夺或限制的权利之一。但由于人身自由的受限制,在客观上已无法通过自己的行为去实现结婚的权利。因此,这需要有关机关的配合与协助,而理性地看待服刑人员的结婚行为是解决问题的关键。     

The Impact of Language Status as an Acculturative Stressor on Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors among Latino/a Children: A Longitudinal Analysis from School Entry through Third Grade

This study examined the relationship between limited English proficiency status, and internalizing and externalizing behaviors among a sample of Latino/a children (N = 2,840) from the US Department of Education’s Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten (ECLS-K) data set. Results of cross sectional regression and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses suggest that there is a positive relationship between limited English proficiency and externalizing symptoms, particularly by third grade. Additionally, sex and place of birth also helped to explain externalizing behaviors at various time points in the models. Place of birth and family poverty were significantly associated with internalizing symptoms. Implications for future research and interventions related to internalizing and externalizing behavior among the Latino/a school aged population are discussed.

Why procedural justice in organizations?

This article reviews the existing research and theory on procedural justice and considers how it may be applied to the study of organizational behavior. It begins by distinguishing between the concepts of distributive justice and procedural justice and noting the historical contexts within which they emerged. Existing conceptual contributions and the research inspired by them are reviewed. The few existing studies applying procedural justice notions to organizational contexts are summarized, and the contributions of the articles to the present issue of this journal are reviewed relative to these efforts. The article closes by discussing the dual benefits of studying procedural justice in organizations: the enhanced understanding of the concept of justice and the behavior of people in organizations.     

类似“性变态”的流氓性犯罪1例

类似“性变态”的流氓性犯罪１例场涛，高保林（上海司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所；上海２０００６３）ＤＩＦＦＥＲＥＮＴＩＡＴＩＯＮＯＦＶＯＹＥＵＲＩＳＭＭＮＤＲＯＧＵＥＲＹＢＥＨＡＩＯＲ￥ＴａｎｇＴａｏ；ＧａｏＢａｏｌｉｎｇ（ＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＦｏｒ...     

对《刑法修正案（七）》第八条的理解与适用

《刑法修正案（七）》第八条将组织未成年人进行盗窃、诈骗、抢夺、敲诈勒索等违反治安管理活动的行为规定为犯罪,文章在罪名、客观行为方面以及此罪与彼罪的区分等问题上作了分析,以期更准确地理解和适用这一条款。     

THE INTERACTION OF ANTISOCIAL PROPENSITY AND LIFE‐COURSE VARYING PREDICTORS OF DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR: DIFFERENCES BY METHOD OF ESTIMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY*

Recent criminological research has explored the extent to which stable propensity and life‐course perspectives may be integrated to provide a more comprehensive explanation of variation in individual criminal offending. One line of these integrative efforts focuses on the ways that stable individual characteristics may interact with, or modify, the effects of life‐course varying social factors. Given their consistency with the long‐standing view that person–environment interactions contribute to variation in human social behavior, these theoretical integration attempts have great intuitive appeal. However, a review of past criminological research suggests that conceptual and empirical complexities have, so far, somewhat dampened the development of a coherent theoretical understanding of the nature of interaction effects between stable individual antisocial propensity and time‐varying social variables. In this study, we outline and empirically assess several of the sometimes conflicting hypotheses regarding the ways that antisocial propensity moderates the influence of time‐varying social factors on delinquent offending. Unlike some prior studies, however, we explicitly measure the interactive effects of stable antisocial propensity and time‐varying measures of selected social variables on changes in delinquent offending. In addition, drawing on recent research that suggests that the relative ubiquity of interaction effects in past studies may be partly from the poorly suited application of linear statistical models to delinquency data, we alternatively test our interaction hypotheses using least‐squares and tobit estimation frameworks. Our findings suggest that method of estimation matters, with interaction effects appearing readily in the former but not in the latter. The implications of these findings for future conceptual and empirical work on stable propensity/time‐varying social variable interaction effects are discussed.