什么是“癣疥之疾”,什么是“心腹之患”——论当今中国的国防战略方向

一个国家选择当前的主要军事战略方向,犹如面临十字路口——方向选对了,日后进退自如,左右得宜;选错了,不仅事倍功半,而且会令国家面临危局,至少整体安全利益在关键节点上会遭受重挫。     

智计百出 施间却敌

班超,字仲升,古扶风安陵人,是东汉一代名将。他为开通中原与西域封闭60余年的联系通道,以壮岁之年,慨然出使西域达30余年,涉险历难不计其数,但每每被他化险为夷。     

台军“汉光24号”演习兵棋推演的新动向

6月23日至27日，台军正式展开“汉光24号”演习电脑兵棋推演。6月26日，马英九以“三军统帅”身份首次进入衡山指挥所亲临观摩。这也是马英九上台执政后台军首次举行年度最大规模的三军联合作战演习。尽管马英九当局至今还未推出正式的军事战略方针，但此次兵推在一定程度上表明台军将采取的新作战思想。     

1946年解放军大练兵

人民解放军战无不胜的秘诀，就在于能够根据形势及时调整自己的战略方针与军事战略。抗战末期，根据中共七大精神，八路军、新四军开始逐步实行由游击战向正规战的转变。     

从美国军事战略报告看未来中国国家安全环境

从2009年美国军事战略报告中,我们可以对未来25年中国国家安全环境的总体特点和局部问题作出某种判断。未来中国国际战略安全环境总体平稳,但周边地区存在较大安全隐患,中东与中亚以及俄罗斯远东地区可能成为未来影响我国国家安全的两个热点地区。另外,未来我国国内安全形势不容乐观,威胁我国国家安全的内部问题较多。针对这些问题,我们需要未雨绸缪,思考对策。     

普京时期俄罗斯军事战略调整历程

普京上任之初针对俄罗斯面临的严峻形势，对新世纪俄罗斯军事战略的若干重大理论和现实问题做出了新的回答。特别是伊拉克战争的爆发，加速了俄罗斯军事战略调整的步伐。以2003年10月俄罗斯颁布的《俄罗斯联邦武装力量发展的紧迫任务》文件为标志，可以将普京担任总统时期俄罗斯军事战略调整划分为两个阶段，本文在此作简要的论述。     

作家将军刘亚洲

刘亚洲的官阶是中国人民解放军空军副政委，中将军衔。由于身居高位，其军事战略思想直接影响中国军方高层。     

China＇s Diplomacy： New Trends and New Characteristics

In the 60 years since the founding of the People＇s Republic of China, the country has pursued a peace-oriented foreign policy. After the end of the Beijing Olympics in October 2008, China＇s foreign relations began to take on a new look. The country now participates more actively in global and regional issues, forging multilateral and bilateral relationships, and entering into discussions on maritime rights and military strategy. It could be said that China is now showing more initiative, independence, confidence, transparency and a greater sense of responsibility, and strengthening cooperation with all partners. These changes are mainly due to China＇s increasing comprehensive national strength and its need to integrate into the international system in a peaceful and harmonious manner with benefits to all. China has redefined its identity and reassessed its interests. These changes are ongoing, and the nation＇s diplomacy is still not perfect, but the general direction has now been set.     

On China＇s Military Transparency

For many years, major Western countries have all along held that the rapid increase of its comprehensive national strength offers china an opportunity ＂to make the country rich and the army strong＂. In their eyes, in the late 1990s, China＇s military expenditure kept growing by two-digit percentage, the orientation of China＇s military modernization was not clear, and China＇s intention in national defense, the scope and composition of its army, the use of military expenditure and military deployments all remained in a ＂non-transparent＂ status. They asserted that all this had constituted challenges and threat to the surrounding countries. In raising the issue of China＇s military transparency, these countries did not refer to bilateral or multilateral issues, but mostly requested China to become unilaterally and all-dimensionally transparent in military affairs. They are publicizing China＇s military transparency either out of their belated knowledge, or lack of trust in China, or for paving the way for concocting the ＂China threat＂ theory.     

Return to Tradition in the Name of Change

The author argues that although a new military strategy of US Armed Forces is far from being completed, an outline has emerged, that is to develop a military strategy suitable for ＂soft power diplomacy＂, rather than Bush＇s strategy of unilateralism and preemption. The author then makes some analysis on the difficulties Obama is facing to fulfill this change.