协调竞争规则:长三角地区经济一体化的重要基石

尽管长江三角洲地区的经济竞争是主权国家内的区域经济竞争 ,但在我国体制转轨时期 ,由于市场利益主体和竞争主体的特殊性 ,导致竞争的行政行为扭曲和资源配置、使用的社会高成本。必须借鉴欧共体创建和欧盟运行的经验 ,在中央政府的统一指导下 ,协调相关地区的竞争规则 ,促进长江三角洲地区经济一体化进程。     

经济全球化对我国西部地区产业竞争力的影响及对策

实施西部大开发战略 ,必须高度重视经济全球化对我国西部地区区域产业竞争力的影响。西部地区只有以积极的姿态迎接全球化的挑战 ,充分把握经济全球化趋势的特征和规律 ,采取有效措施趋利避害 ,才能最大限度的维护西部地区的产业安全 ,发挥区域优势 ,增强区域竞争力 ,促进西部经济的持续、快速、健康发展。     

V.A.T., Taxation and Prostitution: Feminist Perspectives on Polok

Debates concerning the taxation of prostitution have occurred in taxation law and in feminist literature. This article will integrate the case of Polok v. C.E.C. [2002] E.W.H.C, 156; [2002] S.T.C. 361, within the feminist legal canon. The case is discussed in the context of the argument of the European doctrine of fiscal neutrality, which dictates that, regardless of legality as amongst member states, if an activity is levied to V.A.T. in one member state, V.A.T. should be levied on it in all member states. The doctrine of sovereignty accepts the possibility that the integrity of the V.A.T. system may be compromised by the levying of tax on illegal activities, in terms of the cooperation between tax and other aspects of the U.K.’s legal system. European law, feminist law, commodification and the marketplace are all considered within the context of these principles. The article also considers the place of Polok within standard feminist texts on prostitution. Different paradigms of prostitution define different aspects of prostitution as ‘problems’, and the article considers the implications within a feminist reconstruction of Polok of this. The article suggests that the challenge for a feminist analysis of Polok is to remain within the realm of European tax and competition law, and to render the perspective of the employees of the Polok taxpayers part of the substance of the deliberations of the case.     

再论中国竞争法立法例之选择

世界各国的竞争法已形成三种立法例,以美国为代表的松散立法例不适合中国,以德日为代表的分立式立法也已失去选择的价值。中国应该选择一元化立法例制定《中华人民共和国竞争法》,实行反垄断与反不正当竞争的统一,实现实体规范与程序规则的统一,实现传统竞争规则与转型社会的有机结合。     

大珠三角区域的制度学习:动因、过程及前景

在经济全球化和区域化竞争不断加剧的条件下,区域的制度竞争力已经成为决定区域整体竞争力的核心要素。在"一国两制"下,粤、港、澳三地结成的大珠三角区域,共同建构学习型区域,相互进行制度的模仿、学习,进而走向制度的协调和制度的融合,这是缩小区域制度落差,提升区域整体制度竞争力的重要途径。     

Structural Reform Policy: Privatisation and Beyond—The Case of Greece

Privatisation, coupled with liberalisation and competition, constitutes one of the most popular policy options to improve the performance of state-owned enterprises. However, in Greece, it was only after 1991 that privatisation started to gain ground in the political and economic agendas of governments. Drawing upon the theoretical underpinnings of privatisation, the paper overviews and critically analyses the new legal framework on denationalisation in Greece. The paper argues that, though the modernisation of the legal regime is welcomed, the Greek government has failed to treat privatisation as part of wider structural reforms aiming at enhancing competition and foreign investment. The paper concludes that wider structural reforms, including regulatory reform and liberalisation, as well as combating corruption and bureaucracy and promoting transparent capital markets, are absolutely necessary in order to create a competitive environment, which would both complement and support privatisation efforts.     

WTO规则下我国竞争法的调适与发展

竞争法律制度在一个国家经济发展中起着极为重要的作用,素有“经济宪法”之称。入世后,在知识经济和经济全球化的背景下,各种各样的不正当竞争行为、限制竞争行为以及垄断行为对我国经济的健康发展带来了愈来愈严峻的挑战,完善与发展我国竞争法律制度已经成为全社会共同关注的课题。本文立足我国具体国情,从立法层面和具体法律制度层面上提出了我国竞争法律制度的“适世”和发展策略。     

“五比一创”劳动竞赛是促进企业发展的有效途径

天铁集团工会近年加强对"五比一创"劳动竞赛的组织与引导,不断丰富其竞赛内容,建立健全考核奖励机制,有力地促进了企业的发展。     

论我国反垄断法适用除外制度

反垄断法适用除外制度是反垄断法的一项重要法律制度,在各国反垄断立法中均得以确立。美国、德国、日本和欧盟等国家和地区的反垄断法适用除外制度比较完善,且各具特色。反垄断法适用除外制度的形成根源于垄断对经济发展影响的两面性。适用除外制度与一国的政治、经济和国际关系密切相关,对保证国民经济的健康发展具有重要意义。本文通过阐述反垄断法适用除外制度的理论基础,比较国外反垄断法适用除外制度的内容,对我国反垄断法适用除外制度现状进行分析,提出了完善我国反垄断法适用除外制度建议。     

How Chinese enterprises live in freedom, competition under the rule of law

China has thoroughly amended its corporate law and hastens to formulate an anti-monopoly law. To rebound then deny the planned economy once adopted, China firmly practices marketization reform. However, common-recognized rules haven’t taken shape without sufficient gaming and, lots of quick introduced legislations are only superficial provisions. As the trend of corporate legal system in developed countries, freedom and responsibility are the two contraries but not contradictory directions during the recent reform of China’s corporate law. One is deregulation, e.g., introducing one-person company and the transition from approval system to registration system for the establishment of a company; while the other is adding various provisions of responsibility and liability to the Company Law for controlling shareholders, actual controllers, directors, supervisors and top managers. The Anti-Unfair Competition Law of China not only prescribes unfair competition but also counters monopoly. In general, it mainly focuses on anti-monopoly provisions, to popularize the concept and value of free market, making systematic regulations on any kinds of monopoly. This article reviews its background, process, meaning as well as the problems encountered. As there remains somewhat a mystery that China rapidly develops, it may also reflect a fringe of the reason. Prepared for presentation at the Global Fellows Forum, the Hauser Global Law School Program, New York University School of Law, 25 October 2006. The author is a global research fellow of the Hauser Global Law School Program, NYU School of Law. He is grateful to Jerome Cohen, Eleanor Fox and William Allen for most helpful comments, to J. H. H. Weiler for aborative presiding, and to Hua Xiao, Justin Fong, Alex Wang and Han Han for English language assistance.