刑事政策对刑事司法裁判权的弱化与分离

刑事政策的概念可以界定为：国家社会以人道主义为宗旨对已然犯罪人战略的、宏观的和战术的、微观的被动处置措施。刑事政策在客观上不以人的意志为转移地对刑事司法裁判权进行了弱化与分离,这是现代社会民主与法治框架内的国家权力的正常分流。     

徘徊于矫正正义与分配正义之间——刑事被告人补偿制度之提倡

刑事司法赔偿是为了填补基于国家违法行为而发生的损害,其最初是以私法领域中的侵权行为概念与理论为参照,并建立在矫正正义思想上的制度。刑事司法补偿则是为了填补因合法司法行为所造成的公民损失,其以宪法基本人权保障的观念为根本,并且以分配正义为基本原理。刑事赔偿责任与刑事补偿责任有着不同的正当性基础。我国《国家赔偿法》第十七条第(二)、(三)项属于刑事补偿责任性质,刑事补偿责任应以被告人没有刑事责任、权利侵害以及侵害程度达到特别牺牲的逻辑递进式三要件作为成立条件。     

胎儿畸形医疗纠纷法医学鉴定12例分析

目的 探讨因胎儿畸形产生医疗纠纷的主要原因,分析法医学鉴定的切入点以及鉴定思路.方法 参照相关法律、法规与临床诊疗规范,分析本组因胎儿畸形所致12例医疗纠纷法医学鉴定案例中的医疗过错及其参与度划分.结果 本组案例中,存在医疗过错的为5例,其中未履行告知义务的2例,对异常结果未进行综合分析的2例,医疗技术水平有限并报告表...     

被害人宽恕与量刑

传统的司法观念将追究犯罪单纯看作国家的职能，因此容易忽视被害人事后宽恕情节对量刑的影响。司法实践中虽然也有将被害人宽恕当作量刑情节的案例，但是却很少有人对此作出详细论述。从量刑的根据、被害人宽恕作为量刑情节的理论支撑和具备的优秀实践价值出发，全面列举了被害人宽恕应该成为一个酌定的量刑情节的理由。     

An experimental model of regulating the sharing economy in China: The case of online car hailing

Online car hailing represents a disruptive innovation model in the sharing economy and requires a new regulatory response. China's attempts to regulate this emerging industry can be considered highly experimental model. To relieve the pressure from offline competitors and to clarify the ambiguous legal status of online car hailing, China currently enforces a strict regulatory scheme through what can be described as a central-local dual system. Questions, however, have arisen regarding the legality, proportionality and effectiveness of this approach. Moreover, the current system's choice for a segmented market strategy heavily impairs the sustainable development of the sharing economy. Therefore, the adoption of Internet-based regulations for online car hailing might create better prospects to establish a fairly competitive market as well as to further boost the ever dynamic Internet sharing economy in China.     

The E-commerce Law of the People's Republic of China: E-commerce platform operators liability for third-party patent infringement

The E-Commerce Law of the People's Republic of China(E-commerce Law) was enacted on August 31, 2018. One of the hottest topics is e-commerce platform operators (EPOs) liability for third-party patent infringement. The EPOs, which provide platform services rather than participating in trade directly, must try to maintain the balance between patentees and social interests. Due to the particularities of the patent infringement review, it is difficult for the EPOs to fulfil the task. Thus, the EPOs liability for copyright and trademark infringement is likely unworkable in the patent area. A China practice review will be helpful in analysing the problem; the guiding case No. 83 is an especially meaningful reference. The E-Commerce Law is principled and advisory - it is impossible to distinguish the limits of EPOs liability for third-party patent infringement by differentiating the patent from other intellectual property rights. After reviewing the regulations on the general and intellectual property duty of care of EPOs, this article argues that the E-Commerce Law still has some specific problems. Consequently, to implement the E-Commerce Law, judicial interpretation and detailed rules for implementation should be formulated as soon as possible, and the potential solutions are described in the conclusion.     

芬兰二战后经济发展与社会保障的特点与启示

作为一个北欧小国,从自然禀赋上看,芬兰不具备优势,除林业资源和渔业资源外,现代经济发展中关键的煤和石油奇缺。但进入21世纪以来,在世界经济论坛每年所做的全球经济竞争力的排名中,芬兰一直名列前茅,甚至有4次名列榜首,成为最具有经济竞争力国家,这则更加体现出较好的研究和参考价值。芬兰在二战后独特的混合经济体制以及社会保障福利国家体系,构成了芬兰在二战以来经济和社会诸多方面的发展特点。这些特点对中国和其他发展中国家未来的发展道路有着较强的启示和借鉴作用。     

选举权的性质解析

Suffrage is not a right “recognized” by the Constitution but “created” by people through the Constitution, which is a right of the closest relationship with the people’s sovereignty. It is both a right and a power, where the attribute of right is manifested in that it can be waived with the nature of interest and will, and the attribute of power is manifested in that it can determine the interest and destiny of candidates. However, no attribute is complete. Suffrage is an individual right rather than a collective right, with indirect relationship with the state power but direct relationship with the “holders” of state power, creating them and in turn influencing the state power.     

宪法中的任免权之“免”

宪法中的任免权包括＂任＂和＂免＂两个方面,＂任＂是＂免＂的前提,但＂免＂不是＂任＂的必然,而只是其可能的结果。＂免＂的主体有时是由谁＂任＂即由谁＂免＂,有时＂任＂和＂免＂不完全统一（有四种情况）;＂免＂的对象一般是最高国家机关的主要成员;＂免＂的形式有罢免、弹劾、免去等;在＂免＂的程序中,罢免程序主要体现的是民主性,弹劾程序则更强调司法性,后者通常比前者严格。     

香港安老服务体系及其对内地的启示

由于特殊的文化传统和历史背景,香港是我国安老服务起步较早、发展较为完善的地区,在老年服务方面形成了一套制度完备、设施相对健全的体系。随着经济的迅猛发展,内地已逐渐步入老龄化社会,而安老服务仍处于起步阶段,在很多方面并不健全和完善。通过介绍香港完善的安老服务体系和特点,同时结合内地的现状,借鉴香港的成功之处,提出建立以社区居家养老为主的养老模式,同时调动社会各方力量,为内地的长者提供更好的安老服务,使长者能够生活的更加稳定和幸福,同时促进社会的更加和谐和稳定。