首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   507篇
  免费   33篇
各国政治   27篇
工人农民   15篇
世界政治   55篇
外交国际关系   25篇
法律   222篇
中国共产党   1篇
中国政治   4篇
政治理论   180篇
综合类   11篇
  2023年   5篇
  2022年   3篇
  2021年   4篇
  2020年   13篇
  2019年   13篇
  2018年   12篇
  2017年   16篇
  2016年   21篇
  2015年   10篇
  2014年   11篇
  2013年   86篇
  2012年   13篇
  2011年   13篇
  2010年   9篇
  2009年   19篇
  2008年   18篇
  2007年   15篇
  2006年   15篇
  2005年   21篇
  2004年   21篇
  2003年   17篇
  2002年   23篇
  2001年   10篇
  2000年   10篇
  1999年   11篇
  1998年   6篇
  1997年   3篇
  1996年   6篇
  1995年   7篇
  1994年   9篇
  1993年   3篇
  1992年   8篇
  1991年   3篇
  1990年   5篇
  1989年   6篇
  1988年   11篇
  1987年   3篇
  1986年   6篇
  1985年   3篇
  1984年   10篇
  1983年   4篇
  1980年   5篇
  1979年   3篇
  1978年   3篇
  1977年   3篇
  1974年   2篇
  1971年   4篇
  1970年   2篇
  1969年   2篇
  1968年   2篇
排序方式: 共有540条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
This article describes the results of a 1981 survey of 1,000randomly selected scholars of American government and politicswho were asked to rank the most significant intergovernmentalevents and trends of the past twenty years. Responses were receivedfrom almost 40 percent of these scholars; no significant returnbiases were detected. These scholars ranked civil rights andvoting rights acts as the most significant events of these decades.General Revenue Sharing and the reapportionment cases were rankedsecond and third in importance. The increased flow of federaldollars to states and local governments was ranked the mostimportant trend affecting intergovernmental relations, followedby the increased public disaffection with government and thegrowing dependence of local governments on state and federalaid. The Vietnam War and the inflationary spiral it initiatedwas ranked as the most significant social event affecting thecourse of intergovernmental relations, followed closely by theenergy crisis and the beginnings of the "Great Society." Thearticle also examines the effects of party identification, age,year of degree, government experience, region, and city sizeon scholarly attitudes toward these events and trends. Whilethe overall rankings were not dramatically altered, partisanship,region, and city size all were factors found to be noticeablyrelated to scholarly rankings of these important events andtrends.  相似文献   
10.
This article is part of a broader project on the social history or histories of anarchism. The standard accounts of anarchism (Nettlau, Joll, Woodcock, Marshall etc.) have been combinations of the histories of ideas and political/social movements. A larger project I am engaged in uses another methodology and is reliant upon the vast outpouring of published and unpublished academic writing on social history that has been produced since the 1960s. I will cover only several interconnected themes here: anarchism, internationalism and nationalism in Europe. This article will give a synoptic overview of the internationalism of the European anarchist and syndicalist movements during the “classical” period of anarchism (1860–1939). It focuses on the First and Second Internationals and the birth of the Third. It examines the ideology and culture of Internationalism, which was the nursery of the modern anarchist movement. The linkage between federalist and regionalist republicanism is stressed and the legacy of the Paris Commune of 1871 is highlighted. The desire to secure a global level playing field in labour markets promoted labour internationalism during the First International and a revival of this strategy by anarchists and syndicalists during the era of the Second International. The mismatch of industrial development and union density between industrialised Britain or Germany and artisanal and industrialising France and southern Europe limited internationalism in the 1860s and the 1900s. Equally the patriotic legacy of the Commune of Paris undermined the internationalism of anarchists and syndicalists when war broke out in 1914. In 1917–1918 anarchist and syndicalist internationalism seemed to be revived as Europe entered a period of revolutionary discontent. But very quickly the Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union channelled this wave into the Third International and ultimately the interests of the newly born Soviet State. Anarchist and syndicalist internationalism had little effect on the fortunes of the anarchists in the Spanish Civil War in a world of nation‐states and state‐centric political parties and movements.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号