排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 125 毫秒
1
1.
Siegel Judith M. Aneshensel Carol S. Taub Bonnie Cantwell Dennis P. Driscoll Anne K. 《Journal of youth and adolescence》1998,27(4):413-427
This research assessed whether there is an impact of race-ethnicity on depressed mood among adolescents, independent of socioeconomic status, whether gender differences in depressed mood are apparent within all race-ethnicity subgroups, and whether pubertal development influences depressed mood in a similar manner within gender and race-ethnicity subgroups. A three-stage, area probability sampling frame was utilized to select adolescents, ages 12–17 years, for an in-person interview. Depressed mood was assessed by the Children's Depression Inventory. Compared to Whites, African Americans, or Asian Americans, Latinos reported more symptoms of depressed mood, a finding that was independent of socioeconomic status. Advancing puberty was associated with depressed mood only among females, but the timing of pubertal changes, relative to ones peers, was related to depressed mood among both males and females, and among Latinos. 相似文献
2.
Socioeconomic Context, Social Support, and Adolescent Mental Health: A Multilevel Investigation 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
Richard G. Wight Amanda L. Botticello Carol S. Aneshensel 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2006,35(1):109-120
This study examined whether the impact of contextual-level socioeconomic disadvantage on adolescent mental health is contingent
upon individual-level perceptions of social support. Data are from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add
Health), a panel survey of a nationally representative United States sample (analytic N=18,417) of students in 7th through 12th grade. Effects of social support and social context on both internalizing problems
(depressive symptoms) and externalizing problems (minor delinquency and violent behavior) are analyzed. Contextual-level socioeconomic
disadvantage is positively associated with depressive symptoms, negatively associated with minor delinquency, and not directly
associated with violent behavior. High perceived support from family, friends, and other adults offsets poor mental health,
but is most protective in areas of low socioeconomic disadvantage. The mental health benefits of perceived social support
are dampened in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, compared to advantaged areas. Results suggest that interventions targeting
only individual- or family-level processes within disadvantaged contexts may be inadequate at stemming psychological distress
among adolescents.
Richard G. Wight, Assistant Research Sociologist, conducts life course mental health research in the UCLA Department of Community
Health Sciences. His work emphasizes the intersection of individual- and contextual-level factors that impact health within
dyads, families, and neighborhoods.
Amanda L. Botticello is a doctoral student in the UCLA Department of Community Health Sciences, where her work addresses the
reciprocal relationships between depressive symptoms and problem drinking among adolescents.
Carol S. Aneshensel is a Professor of Community Health Sciences at UCLA, where she applies principals of social stratification
and life course theory to the analysis of quantitative data to better understand disparities in mental health risks. 相似文献
3.
4.
Camillia K. Lui Paul J. Chung Steven P. Wallace Carol S. Aneshensel 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2014,43(7):1134-1150
The transition from adolescence to adulthood is a critical time for status attainment, with income, education, work experience, and independence from parents accruing at varying speeds and intensities. This study takes an intergenerational life-course perspective that incorporates parents’ and one’s own social status to examine the status attainment process from adolescence into adulthood in the domains of economic capital (e.g., income) and human capital (e.g., education, occupation). Survey data from three waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (analytic n = 8,977) are analyzed using latent class analysis to capture the ebb and flow of social status advantages and disadvantages from adolescence (Wave 1) through young adulthood (Wave 3) into adulthood (Wave 4). The analytic sample is composed of 50.3 % females and 70.2 % Whites, 15.3 % Blacks, 11.0 % Hispanics, and 3.5 % Asians ages 12–18 at Wave 1 and 25–31 at Wave 4. Four latent classes are found for economic capital and five for human capital. The importance of parents’ social status is demonstrated by the presence of large groups with persistently low and persistently high social status over time in both domains. The capacity of individuals to determine their own status, however, is shown by equally large groups with upward and downward mobility in both domains. These findings demonstrate the dynamic nature of social status during this critical developmental period. 相似文献
1