排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
The existence of a "bidding market" is commonly cited as a reasonto tolerate the creation or maintenance of highly concentratedmarkets. We discuss three erroneous arguments to that effect:the "consultants' fallacy" that "market power is impossible,"the "academics' fallacy" that (often) "market power does notmatter," and the "regulators' fallacy" that "intervention againstpernicious market power is unnecessary," in markets characterizedby auctions or bidding processes.Furthermore we argue that theterm "bidding market" as it is widely used in antitrust is unhelpfulor misleading. Auctions and bidding processes do have some specialfeaturesincluding their price formation processes, common-valuesbehavior, and bid-taker powerbut the significance ofthese features has been overemphasized, and they often implya need for stricter rather than more lenient competition policy. 相似文献
2.
1