排序方式: 共有6条查询结果,搜索用时 836 毫秒
1
1.
Regions can be considered as “regional innovation systems,” but the question of whether and to what extent technology transfer is taking place at this or other (e.g., national and global) levels remains empirical. The theme issue contains a number of case studies of “regional innovation systems” within the European Union. Other papers elaborate on the pros and cons of the systemic approach to the technology transfer processes involved, or make comparisons across regions. In this introduction, the editors discuss the relations between regional policies, technology and innovation policies, and the integration of these different aspects into (potentially regional) systems of innovation. Under what conditions can “technology transfer” be considered as a mechanism of integration at the regional level? 相似文献
2.
Loet Leydesdorff 《The Journal of Technology Transfer》2006,31(1):189-203
The Triple Helix of university–industry–government (UIG) relations is elaborated into a systemic model that accounts for interactions
among three dimensions. By distinguishing between the respective micro-operations, this model enables us to recombine the
“Mode 2” thesis of a new production of scientific knowledge and the study of systems of innovation with the neo-classical
perspective on the dynamics of the market. The mutual information in three dimensions provides us with an indicator for the
self-organization of the resulting network systems. The probabilistic entropy in this mutual information can be negative in
knowledge-based configurations. The knowledge base of an economy can be considered as a second-order interaction effect among
interactions at interfaces between institutions and functions in different spheres. Proximity enhances the chances for couplings
and, therefore, the formation of technological trajectories. The next-order regime of the knowledge base, however, can be
expected to remain pending as selection pressure. 相似文献
3.
The triple helix model of university-industry-government relations is explicated for the transfer of technology. Drawing upon a broad range of international instances, the stages and phases through which the institutional spheres most relevant to innovation are drawn into a more productive relationship are discussed in comparison to alternative models. 相似文献
4.
Selma Leydesdorff 《Human Rights Review》2007,8(3):187-198
It is argued that the stories of the survivors of the Srebrenica massacre in 1995 have been neglected by the memorial culture
of Bosnia and by the various national reports that investigated how the massacre could have taken place. The author argues
that a satisfactory history of the genocide has to include the voices of the survivors, in this case, the women. These are
stories of trauma that are hard to listen to. She compares listening to them to the difficulty historians experience in listening
to the stories of other genocides like the Shoah/Holocaust, they are stories based on silence about what cannot be told. The
argument relies on the oral history literature on listening to trauma as personal and subjective accounts of survival. They
are not straightforward referential narratives. One narrative, the narrative of Sabaheta who lost her child and husband, is
central to the piece. She is one of the women interviewed by the author. The interview expresses sorrow about loss and rage
about the international community; these stories are interwoven. The narrative also describes through the eyes of the victim
what she felt happened. The author is Dutch, so is part of the one nation – more than any other – that is accused of “doing
nothing.” It was the Dutch army that was supposed to protect the civilian population of Srebrenica. The government of The
Netherlands has halted any negotiation on financial support for the research as “the project does not help to overcome trauma.”
She argues that giving a voice to the victim is a necessary step toward closure. 相似文献
5.
6.
In this introduction the editors showcase the papers by way of a structured project and seek to clarify the two key concepts
cited in the title. We consider the history of the idea that knowledge is an economic factor, and discuss the question of
whether regions provide the relevant system of reference for knowledge-based economic development. Current transformations
in university-industry-government relations at various levels can be considered as a metamorphosis in industry organization.
The concept of constructed advantage will be elaborated. The various papers arising from a conference on this subject hosted by Memorial University, Newfoundland,
Canada are approached from this perspective. 相似文献
1