论打击多发性侵财案件中的便衣侦查模式

目前,抢劫、抢夺、盗窃等多发性侵财犯罪突出,且呈现出侵害目标广泛,团伙系列作案,作案地点日趋街面化、路面化,作案手段日趋智能化等特点。便衣侦查是新形势下打击多发性侵财案件的有效侦查模式。实施便衣侦查,应以情报信息研判为前提。     

多发性侵财案件特征分析简

当前,多发性侵财案件在某种程度上成为反映社会治安形势的“晴雨表”,严重影响着人民群众的幸福感、安全感,人民群众反映强烈,各级党委、政府高度关注.从系统的角度对多发性侵财案件特征进行全面分析,可以为科学制定侦查对策、提高多发性侵财案件侦查效益、维护社会治安形势稳定提供理论支持.     

Sociodemographic,Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects of Penitentiary Psychiatric Consultation: Toward Integration Into the General Mental Health Services

The characteristics of mental disorders, as well as deficiencies in their treatment, must be properly defined. This was a prospective, longitudinal, observational study, in which all men referred to a penitentiary psychiatric consultation of three penitentiary centers in Spain were invited to participate. Those who consented to participation (1328) were interviewed at the baseline timepoint and at intervals for up to 3 years. The presence of mental disorders was high: 68.2% had a cluster B personality disorder, 14% had an affective and/or anxiety disorders, 13% had schizophrenia, and over 80% had a dual disorder. Polypharmacy was the norm. Moreover, the health care received in prison did not match that provided in the community in terms of quantity and quality. These results should help to facilitate the design of mental healthcare provision for prisoners, focusing on both the most frequent patient profiles and equality of care.     

多发型群体性事件与社会泄愤事件的比较研究

多发型群体性事件与社会泄愤事件相比,前者是后者的诱因,也是其必经阶段。前者主体的最终目的为达成自己的利益诉求,具体有煽动情绪扩事态、杜撰事实博同情、强推己责问政府、曲解政策求利益等;后者的主体目的更杂,包括发泄不满、唯恐不乱、盲从、表现等。前者主体是"熟人群体",后者主体是无组织群体。前者行为方式以软暴力为主,后者行为方式有打砸抢烧。前者发生数量极多,称为多发,后者发生数量极少,是为可数。     

“于一家频盗及一时而盗数家”的古代立法及其现代启示

唐律在“窃盗”条的疏文中规定“其有于一家频盗及一时而盗数家者，并累而倍论”，古代自此始有“于一家频盗”和“一时而盗数家”这种犯罪形态和计赃规则的专门立法，元律和明清律对此予以变更，并在计赃上“以一主为重”。相比之下，唐律“累而倍论”的计赃规则公平合理。这种形态无论是古代还是现代，都是客观存在的社会现实，古代窃盗立法的“于一家频盗”和“一时而盗数家”形态的提出以及立法处置，对我们研究现代相关犯罪同样情形的形态认定和法律适用具有启发意义。     

Intensified Terrorism Counteroffensive

Since 2013,frequent violent incidents have taken place in and outside Xinjiang.This is not an ethnic or religious issue,but one that has escalated into brutal terrorist attacks that endanger life and property.     

预算执行审计“屡审屡犯”问题探析——以国家治理视角的考量

国家审计因其内生的监督评价职能而成为国家治理不可缺少的有效工具和重要制度安排。国家审计有效发挥监督作用的前提是基于国家公共财政治理的各项制度本身的合理安排和良性互动。多年来出现的预算执行审计"屡审屡犯"现象,说明基于国家治理的制度安排存在缺陷。对某省省级部门预算执行审计"屡审屡犯"问题的分析表明,"屡审屡犯"背后的根源是政府预算制度、预算执行审计管理制度、政府预算管理配套制度均存在自身局限。要治理该问题,就必须从改革完善政府预算制度、深化改进预算执行审计、建立健全相关配套制度等方面寻求对策。