目前我国行政立法监督机制探讨

很长一段时间,我国没有统一的行政立法程序,行政机关一般都按照自己制定的程序进行行政立法。我国目前没有统一的监督行政立法的法律规定,只是通过批准和备案两种监督方式对行政立法进行监督,除此之外,再没有“事前”和“事后”的监督措施,我国目前也还没有建立对行政立法的司法审查制度。因此,我们有必要对目前我国行政立法监督机制进行探讨。     

邓小平对真理标准问题讨论的支持和引导叙论——纪念邓小平诞辰100周年

坚决支持和正确引导真理标准问题讨论,重新确立党的马克思主义思想路线,是邓小平的一大历史功绩。邓小平明确肯定了《实践是检验真理的唯一标准》的文章;深刻地阐述了实践标准,提出了“精髓说”;深入剖析了“两个凡是”的反马克思主义实质;他采取有力措施推动讨论的发展;他全面总结了这场大讨论,精辟阐明思想路线的极端重要性。邓小平创立了“思想路线”的科学概念和一套思想路线理论,在党内得到普遍认同,使党的思想路线得以重新确立起来。     

我国法官制度变革思路之检讨

实现法官制度的现代化是中国法制现代化的必然要求。目前我国的法官制度改革尚存在一定不足 ,如渐进式的改革思路无法从根本上解决问题 ;法官等级化思维模式及外延性改革思路不利于建设高素质的法官队伍等。今后法官制度变革应该走出传统的思维模式 ,实现法官体制的创新     

“自然状态”的工资集体协商——中国南方某镇羊毛衫行业工资集体协商

羊毛新行业集体协商中的主体及其运作是中国现在基本法律制度环境的自然产物,它能以最低的交易费用解决劳资关系矛盾.     

西部地区产业结构调整与优化问题探讨

西部大开发是我国在世纪之交作出的重大战略性决策。这项决策不仅对西部地区的崛起,而且对21世纪 我国经济社会的长远发展都将产生重大影响。支持西部地区开发建设,实现东西部地区协调发展,是我们党领导经济 工作的一条重要方针。     

浅析职代会审议职权

审议权是职代会基本职权之一,特别是在改革日趋深化阶段,更是承担着维护职工合法权益的责任。但是由于审议权的权限,它与其他职权的行使范围和程度还是有所不同,因此,在实际工作中,准确区别审议职权的工作内容、工作对象和工作性质是非常必要的一件大事。     

网络极化现象研究——基于四个中文BBS论坛的内容分析

本文试图把"极化"这一概念引入网络政治传播的考察中,主要针对四个中文BBS论坛(强国深水、猫眼看人、天涯杂谈和新浪杂谈)政治讨论中的极端化态度分布状态进行描述与比较。结果显示,态度极化现象与论坛群体和特定的议题类别紧密相关。其中激进派聚集的论坛更容易出现极化;涉及"政府"的议题更容易在激进的论坛中出现极化,而在温和派占据主流的论坛则呈现非极化状态。同时,发帖积极性越高的ID越容易出现态度极化的现象;而且,网民的意见同质化程度越高,则群体极化的程度也就越高。     

广州市学校卫生行政处罚现况分析

目的:分析广州市学校卫生行政处罚现况,探讨新时期学校卫生监督执法的发展形势和工作重点.方法:纳入全市卫生监督机构自2018年1月1日至12月31日查办且已结案的学校卫生行政处罚案件135宗,分析案件的案由、主体、处罚内容分布等.结果:2018年广州市学校卫生行政处罚案件案由主要分布于教学和生活环境卫生专业(56.3％)...     

Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue During Campaign 2000

A new measure of opinion quality that we name "argument repertoire" (AR) is introduced and evaluated. AR refers to the relevant reasons that one has for one's own opinions and the relevant reasons that others with opposite opinions might have. The measure is shown to be reliable and to have construct validity. Those with elevated AR also were more likely to attend on-line deliberative groups during the presidential election and to contribute to those conversations. Those who participated in online deliberations tended to have higher AR scores on particular issues that were discussed. The role of AR in deliberative political groups is explored.     

Race and Public Deliberation

Although deliberation has a central place in democratic theory, scholars know little about how it actually works. Most deliberative theorists emphasize the many good consequences of deliberation. By contrast, Mansbridge suggests that deliberation in certain circumstances may exacerbate conflict. Scholarship on racial politics suggests that each hypothesis is complicated by implicitly racial language. Using a quasi-experiment, we contrast the rhetoric in two town meetings about school desegregation: a segregated meeting with homogeneous interests, in which segregated Whites unanimously argued against desegregation, and an integrated meeting with heterogeneous interests, in which segregated Whites argued against integrated Whites, Hispanics, and African Americans. We find that (a) deliberation at the segregated meeting maintained consensus among segregated Whites; (b) these citizens used coded rhetoric that appeared universal, well-reasoned, and focused on the common good, but in fact advanced their group interest; (c) deliberation at the integrated meeting maintained the conflict between segregated Whites and others; and (d) there, rhetoric that seemed universal to segregated Whites was decoded by the integrated audience as racist and group interested. We highlight the problem posed by the contested meaning of language and suggest ways to make deliberation more effective.