排序方式： 共有246条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
教育目的最终还是还原于对人本质的思考。从本质上说 ,人是创造者 ,是教育的主体 ,人的最大自由与解放是当代教育的终极目标。 相似文献
2.
在判断金融诈骗罪"非法占有目的"时仅有判断标准是不够的,还必须解决判断标准的应用问题。判断过程中证明非法占有目的的积极因素和消极因素的存在状况及其相互关系,对判断结果有着直接的影响。 相似文献
3.
Jonathan Gangi 《Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society》2013,43(4):247-254
Arts Entrepreneurship education as a field continues to grow, but misperceptions of entrepreneurship seem to cause confusion among arts students, faculty, and administrators regarding the value of entrepreneurial training to higher education arts programs. These misperceptions are explored to determine if entrepreneurship, for artists, is harmful or helpful. By articulating the theoretical essence of entrepreneurship, it is suggested that entrepreneurial action is profoundly synergetic with artistic action and purpose, and that arts faculty and administrators can embrace entrepreneurship education and its value to aspiring professional artists. 相似文献
4.
论我国侦查程序中检警关系的优化--以制度的功能分析为中心 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
卞建林 《国家检察官学院学报》2005,13(3):59-66,101
评判侦查程序中检警关系构建是否合理的标准应为是否有利于侦查程序目的的实现,本文以侦查程序的三重目的来设定侦查程序中理想的检警关系所应具备的功能,并依此功能设定分析我国现行检警关系所存在的缺陷,进而提出优化我国侦查程序中检警关系的具体构想。 相似文献
5.
田向利 《河北青年管理干部学院学报》2003,(1)
深入学习贯彻党的十六大精神,就是要高举一面伟大旗帜,坚持三个理论品质;就是要结合河北实际,树正气、讲团结、求发展;就是要明确一个奋斗目标,投身三个文明实践,团结带领团员青年在全面建设小康社会的伟大征程中建功立业;就是要立足发展一个要务,推进团的三项建设,全面开创新世纪新阶段共青团工作的新局面。 相似文献
7.
随着我国贷款金融业务的日益发展,诈骗贷款违法犯罪活动也随之产生并愈益严重。同时,贷款诈骗犯罪呈手段多样化、智能化、复杂化的发展趋势。在司法实践中认定本罪常常涉及到对该犯罪的主观方面（非法占有目的）,主体范围等热点和难点问题如何理解的问题,因此,本文试图运用刑法理论,结合刑法的规定,对有关贷款诈骗罪的司法适用问题作些探讨,以期对司法实践部门办理此类案件有所帮助。 相似文献
8.
ABSTRACTInstitutions undertake a huge variety of constitutive purposes. One of the roles of legitimacy is to protect and promote an institution’s pursuit of its purpose; state legitimacy is generally understood as the right to rule, for example. When considering legitimacy beyond the state, we have to take account of how differences in purposes change legitimacy. I focus in particular on how differences in purpose matter for the stringency of the standards that an institution must meet in order to be legitimate. An important characteristic of an institution’s purpose is its deontic status, i.e. whether it is morally impermissible, merely permissible, or mandatory. Although this matters, it does so in some non-obvious ways; the mere fact of a morally impermissible purpose is not necessarily delegitimating, for example. I also consider the problem of conflicting, multiple, and contested institutional purposes, and the different theoretical roles for institutional purpose. Understanding how differences in purpose matter for an institution’s legitimacy is one part of the broader project of theorizing institutional legitimacy in the many contexts beyond the traditional context of the state. 相似文献
9.
Antoinette Scherz Alain Zysset 《Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy》2020,23(3):371-391
ABSTRACTThis paper discusses how the general and abstract concept of legitimacy applies to international institutions, using the United Nations Security Council as an example. We argue that the evaluation of the Security Council’s legitimacy requires considering three significant and interrelated aspects: its purpose, competences, and procedural standards. We consider two possible interpretations of the Security Council’s purpose: on the one hand, maintaining peace and security, and, on the other, ensuring broader respect for human rights. Both of these purposes are minimally morally acceptable for legitimacy. Second, we distinguish between three different competences of the UNSC: 1) the decision-making competence, 2) the quasi-legislative competence, and 3) the referral competence. On this basis, we argue that different procedural standards are required to legitimise these competences, which leads to a more differentiated understanding of the Security Council’s legitimacy. While maintaining that the membership structure of the Council is a severe problem for its legitimacy, we suggest other procedural standards that can help to improve its overall legitimacy, which include broad transparency, deliberation, and the revisability of the very terms of accountability themselves. 相似文献
10.
ABSTRACTSo far, most of the philosophical literature on occupations has tried to assess the legitimacy of military rule in the aftermath of armed conflicts by exclusively employing the theoretical resources of just war theory. In this paper, I argue that this approach is mistaken. Occupations occur during or in the aftermath of wars but they are fundamentally a specific type of rule over persons. Thus, theories of political legitimacy should be at least as relevant as just war theory for the moral evaluation of occupations. This paper, therefore, draws on both traditions and argues that just war theory plays a limited role in identifying the purposes and appropriate agents of occupation authority, but that theories of legitimacy are necessary for explaining why and under which conditions foreign actors have the right to rule in the aftermath of armed conflicts. 相似文献