幸福的伦理学解读

幸福概念深刻而复杂,可以在三个层次上把握。首先,幸福是人生重大的快乐;进一步说,是人生重大需要和欲望得到满足的心理体验,是人生重大目的得到实现的心理体验;最终是达到生存和发展的某种完满的心理体验。与此相对,不幸首先是人生重大的痛苦;进一步说,是人生重大需要和欲望得不到满足的心理体验,是人生重大目的得不到实现的心理体验;最终是生存和发展受到严重损害的心理体验。     

再论精神损害赔偿的几个问题

我国的精神损害赔偿历经从无到有,由简单到逐步走向成熟的发展过程,这些年已成为学术界和实务界研究和探讨的热点问题。本文从精神损害赔偿的概念之手,对精神损害赔偿制度中存在的几个问题提出了自己的看法。     

A Critical Point For Europe

正China tries to give a hand as the euro zone struggles on the verge of collapse Greece,the first European country to fall into debt trouble,is faced with a painful decision on whether to stay in the euro zone.At present,the country is suffering the heavy blow of a triple crisis- sovereign debt,social problems and political uncertainty.There are no regulations on how a member     

Somber Celebrations

正September 3 is a date of vital importance to Chinese people.On this day,69 years ago,Chinese forces celebrated a hard-fought victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression(1937-45)following many years of suffering and ter-ritorial invasions.Just this February,the National People’s Congress,China’s top legislature,designated September 3 the Victory Day of this war,which was part of World War II(WWII).As ac-tivities are held across the country to mark     

Editorial Introduction

Abstract

There has always been a tension between a critique of ‘real existing conditions’ and meta-theoretical paradigms through which the tasks of critique can both be anchored and images of humankind explored.     

中越两党的忧患意识及其比较

中越两党都具有强烈的忧患意识。由于同属马克思主义政党和社会主义国家,又面临着大致相同的历史任务和社会发展阶段,因而中越两党在忧患意识方面共性颇多。但党情、国情、社会复杂程度和经济发展水平的差异,又使中越两党的忧患意识具有各自的特点。     

论中国共产党执政风险的防范

新的历史起点,中国共产党面临着重大战略机遇,但也面临诸多执政风险。增强忧患意识和风险意识,科学防范经济退化的风险、政权异化的风险、意识形态淡化的风险、社会矛盾激化的风险,提高党的科学发展能力、利益整合能力、思想引领能力、危机处置能力和组织革新能力,对于保持和发展党的先进性,巩固执政基础和执政地位,具有重要意义。     

自残与自慰--走向精神的悲剧

在余华的部分作品中显示出一种精神走向--以"自残"来表达对传统文化的决绝,以"自慰"来抗拒突围的精神阵痛,在接受命运、苦难和亲情的同时走向悲剧精神.     

Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: the view from the bench and the jury box

Civil jury instructions are inconsistent in defining what constitutes noneconomic damages, which may include pain, suffering, disability, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life (LEL), among other injury sequelae. This inconsistency has been manifested recently in court decisions that have considered whether LEL should be treated as a separate element of noneconomic damages, distinct from pain and suffering. This paper reviews the case law on this issue and also describes a jury simulation experiment. Mock jurors awarded damages after they received instructions on noneconomic damages in which LEL was (1) not identified as a distinct element of damages; (2) defined as an element of damages distinct from pain and suffering, but participants awarded a single amount for noneconomic damages; or (3) defined as a distinct element of damages, and participants awarded separate amounts for LEL and pain and suffering. Instructions about LEL resulted in larger awards, but only when mock jurors also made a separate award for that element of damages.     

刑事附带民事诉讼之客体分析--对附带民事诉讼赔偿范围的思考

基于对刑事实体法与刑事程序法中所使用"经济损失"与"物质损失"概念内涵与外延的理解不一,同时受民事案件审理中对精神损失判决赔偿的影响,审判实践中,在刑事附带民事诉讼中是否应对被害人精神损失予以赔偿各地做法不一.刑事法律规范明文规定对附带民事诉讼赔偿范围仅限定于财产性损失,但立法的规定从未中止理论界探索的脚步,随着对人权观念的重视,要求进行精神损害赔偿的呼声越来越高,将理论界在附带民事诉讼中能否提起精神损害赔偿之诉的两种对立观点的剖析,无疑对司法实践有所裨益.