首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

保护作品完整权的有损声誉要件:实然与应然——“《九层妖塔》案”二审判决引发的思考
引用本文:王清.保护作品完整权的有损声誉要件:实然与应然——“《九层妖塔》案”二审判决引发的思考[J].电子知识产权,2020(1):70-85.
作者姓名:王清
作者单位:武汉大学知识产权高级研究中心
摘    要:保护作品完整权之有损作者声誉构成要件已具有《著作权法》上的实然地位,否定该构成要件存在的非声誉论忽视法条解释的立法历史解释法和目的解释法值得商榷。根据著作权基本理论以及国外高水平精神权利立法动态,判断是否侵犯保护作品完整权也应当以有损作者的声誉作为客观构成要件。

关 键 词:著作权  保护作品完整权  声誉  九层妖塔

Constitutive Requirement of Prejudicing Reputation for the Right to Integrity: Being and Ought to Be: Refl ections on the Nine Monster Tower Case’s Final Judgement
Wang Qing.Constitutive Requirement of Prejudicing Reputation for the Right to Integrity: Being and Ought to Be: Refl ections on the Nine Monster Tower Case’s Final Judgement[J].Electronics Intellectual Property,2020(1):70-85.
Authors:Wang Qing
Abstract:Prejudicing author’s or authors’ reputation has already been an integral constitutive requirement for the right to integrity in the Chinese Copyright Law. The arguments denying its existence are open to discussion for neglecting the legal interpretative methods of legislative history and legislative purposes. According to the basic theories of copyright as well as the dynamics of high-level moral rights legislation abroad, assessing whether an act infringes the right to integrity should also use prejudicing author’ or authors’ reputation as an objective requirement.
Keywords:Copyright  the Right to Integrity  Reputation  Nine Monster Tower
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号