首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

诉讼欺诈行为定性之探析
引用本文:欧阳竹筠,汪飞容.诉讼欺诈行为定性之探析[J].河北法学,2005,23(10):127-131.
作者姓名:欧阳竹筠  汪飞容
作者单位:1. 中南财经政法大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430073
2. 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072
摘    要:诉讼欺诈行为具有严重的社会危害性,但目前我国现行刑法对于诉讼欺诈行为的处罚力度不够,在司法实践中对同一行为处理结果差别悬殊。这主要是由于我国立法上对于该行为没有统一明确的规定,刑法理论上对该行为的定性问题争论颇大所致。对于诉讼欺诈行为,不宜按诈骗罪定罪处罚。对于诉讼欺诈犯罪过程中所实施的触犯现行刑法的行为,应依法定罪处罚,对于刑法没有规定的部分应按无罪处理。我国刑法应单独设立“诉讼欺诈罪”。

关 键 词:诉讼欺诈  定性论争  定性分析  立法建议
文章编号:1002-3933(2005)10-0127-05
修稿时间:2005年4月8日

Qualitative Studies of the Act of Litigation Fraud
OUYANG Zhu-jun,WANG Fei-rong.Qualitative Studies of the Act of Litigation Fraud[J].Hebei Law Science,2005,23(10):127-131.
Authors:OUYANG Zhu-jun  WANG Fei-rong
Institution:OUYANG Zhu-jun~1,WANG Fei-rong~2
Abstract:Litigation fraud does great harm to the society.The penalty which China's existing criminal law has provided is far away from enough at present,and results of dealing with the same act of litigation fraud in judicial practice show great differences,the reasons for which may be that litigation fraud has not been unified and enacted explicitly in legislation and there is much difference in defining this act in China's theory of criminal law.Litigation fraud should not be convicted and punished in accordance with the crime of fraud.The acts of litigation fraud that go against the existing criminal code should be condemned and those that haven't been enacted by criminal code should be convicted innocence.China's criminal code should establish "crime of litigation fraud" singly.
Keywords:litigation fraud  qualitative arguments  qualitative analysis  legislative suggestion
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号