首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

医学会从事医疗损害鉴定之合法性研究
引用本文:陈志华.医学会从事医疗损害鉴定之合法性研究[J].法律与医学杂志,2011(3).
作者姓名:陈志华
作者单位:北京陈志华律师事务所;
摘    要:本文回顾了我国医疗纠纷鉴定体制发展历程,分析了医学会鉴定与司法鉴定的优缺点。在此基础上,认为在现阶段,医学会参与医疗损害鉴定具有一定的、但并不充分的法律依据,具有相对的合法性,医学会应属准法定鉴定部门。可以通过最高人民法院制定司法解释或卫生部制定规章的方式使其尽快转正。尽管如此,医学会作出的鉴定结论并不具有必然的证明力,其鉴定程序和鉴定书形式等亦应符合法律规定,而鉴定人署名并出庭接受质证是其鉴定结论被法院采信的前提条件。

关 键 词:侵权责任法  医学会  司法鉴定机构  医疗损害鉴定  合法性  

Research on Legality of Medical Malpractice Identification Conducted by Medical Association
Chen Zhihua.Direct or , Attorney of Beijing Angelo Chen Law Firm..Research on Legality of Medical Malpractice Identification Conducted by Medical Association[J].The Journal of Law & Medicine,2011(3).
Authors:Chen ZhihuaDirect or  Attorney of Beijing Angelo Chen Law Firm
Institution:Chen Zhihua.Direct or and Attorney of Beijing Angelo Chen Law Firm.
Abstract:This paper first reviews the development of medical malpractice identification in China and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the identification conducted by medical associations and judicial appraisal institutions.And then the author concludes that medical association is currently a quasi-legal appraisal institution with partial legality,whose appraisal is legally necessary but insufficient.It can become an official legal appraisal institution by the judicial interpretation or regulation issued ...
Keywords:Tort Liability Act  Medical association  Judicial appraisal Institution  Medical malpractice identification  Legality  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号